What was the motive for the 911 attacks again?
To get Iraqi Oil I believe is the general CT consensus....
Yet we still don't have that oil, and we don't need that oil....
Not to mention the fact that we were already bombing Iraqi military targets and didn't need much to start a full scale war, Just crash one fighter would have been enough.
And then there's the confusion of why use a bunch of Saudi's and bin Laden in Afghanistan if Iraq was the target......
Makes about zero sense......
But of course Ct'ers won't understand that......
My God...I can't believe a military man doesn't have the smarts to read all the vast amounts of information regarding this....
It was for oil, and no YOU weren't going to be given any stock or free ******* gasoline.
It was also for the "security of Israel"...These 2 things have been repeated by many in the former administration, military, and intelligence people...
You got had, bamboozled, and ******* scammed, wake the **** up to the reality, because no matter what you try to convince yourself of otherwise, it's the reality....you ignorant gump..
Gee i thought Mrs Jones wasn't talking to me anymore.....
Your ignorance is hard to avoid, especially when you hide behind the cover of your supposed military service. It obvious you're a phoney, and try to garner respect and support for the liars and criminals who sent our people off to die for lies.
Oh well, Yes a military man can see how easy it would have been to restart the shooting war with Saddam without going through years of preparation and coverup. Simple as I said just one fighter blown out of the sky, and blamed on Saddam.
Well then if it was so ******* easy why didn't you volunteer your vast expertise and show them how they could fake a shootdown? Why didn't they just go ahead and do that instead of pretending it was democracy and liberation of Iraq, or that Iraq had something to do with 9-11? Or the whole fake WMD story?
You are a joke, and a fool, and it's sickening to read your rubbish in defense of lies and the enemies of America, while pretending to be a military patriot, just ******* sickening..
Even if it was for oil or for Israel the same applies one plane, not 3000 innocent lives. And almost zero chance of getting caught.
Now who in the former administration has said these things? Please go ahead and quote where anyone in the Government said that 011 happened so we could go after Saddam....
We can wait......
It was for oil, ME military strategy, and Israel, but if all the lies and information that has come out don't matter to you or the deaths that resulted, you aren't worthy of calling yourself an American...
Not once have I read anything where you criticize the lies, and false rumors that were spread in order to foment anger so our people would fight this useless war....Not once.
South Carolina's senior Senator said in May 2004 that Iraq was invaded "to secure Israel,
Politicians and intellectuals spoke out and were promptly chastised and labelled with the BS anti -Semitic tag.
Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Charles Krauthammer,and other Zionist scumbags pushed for war in the ME as way to make secure their shitty little state.
These Zionist infiltrated the US government like a ******* cancer. They wrote about such military adventures that would only be favorable to Israel. These were the same men who quickly pointed to OBL and Qaeda as the 9-11 attackers..By way of deception your nation was attacked, and dragged into conflicts with devastating results, that you say you
witness, and even try to console the dead's widows???
But you defend the liars every chance you get? You are a sick twisted person, and a hypocrite.
After the US Senator was attacked and slandered for speaking the truth, he rose in the Senate on May 20 to defend and explain himself
"I don't apologize for this column," he said. "I want them to apologize to me for talking about anti-Semitism." President Bush went to war in Iraq "to secure our
friend, Israel" and "everybody knows it,"
This man had more balls then you could ever dream of having, you ******* gump.
Referring to the cowardly reluctance of his Congressional colleagues openly to acknowledge this reality, he said that "nobody is willing to stand up and say what is going on."
With few exceptions, members of Congress uncritically support Israel and its policies due to "the pressures that we get politically," he said. The pro-Israel lobby knows "how to make you tuck tail and run." But "not the Senator from South Carolina," he added, referring to himself. To emphasize the seriousness of his remarks, Hollings said: "I have thought this out as thoroughly as I know how, and it worries me that here we are..."
Bush's motive in going to war for Israeli interests, Hollings charged, was to get Jewish support in election campaigns. "President Bush came to office imbued with one thought: reelection. I say that advisedly. I have been up here with eight Presidents. We have had support of all eight Presidents. Yes, I supported the President on this Iraq resolution, but I was misled. There weren't any weapons, or any terrorism, or al-Qaida. This is the reason we went to war. He had one thought in mind, and that was reelection...
"That is not a conspiracy. That is the policy. I didn't like to keep it a secret, maybe; but I can tell you now, I will challenge any one of the other 99 Senators to tell us why we are in Iraq, other than what this policy is here. It is an adopted policy, a domino theory of The [Zionist] Project For The New American Century. Everybody knows it [is] because we want to secure our friend, Israel...
"Let's realize we are in real trouble. Saudi Arabia is in trouble. Israel is in trouble. The United States is in trouble. I am going to state what I believe to be the fact. In fact, I believe it very strongly. They just are whistling by on account of the pressures that we get politically. Nobody is willing to stand up and say what is going on."
Hollings cited the role of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the most important pro-Israel lobby group in Washington, in determining US policy in the Middle East. "You can't have an Israel policy other than what AIPAC gives you around here. I have followed them mostly in the main, but I have also resisted signing certain letters from time to time, to give the poor President a chance.
"I can tell you no President takes office -- I don't care whether it is a Republican or a Democrat -- that all of a sudden AIPAC will tell him exactly what the policy is, and Senators and members of Congress ought to sign letters. I read those carefully and I have joined in most of them. On some I have held back. I have my own idea and my own policy...
The Iraq war has been "a bad mistake," said Hollings. "Getting rid of Saddam was not worth almost 800 dead GIs and over 3,500 maimed for life..." This war is "a mistake like Vietnam," he added. "We got misled with the [1964] Gulf of Tonkin [incident]. We got misled here, and we are in that quagmire...
"The entire thing is a mess. Don't give me 'support the troops, support the troops.' I have been with troops, about three years in combat, so don't tell me about troops. I have always supported the troops."
'Iraq Was Invaded to Secure Israel,' Says Senator Hollings
So Ollie, your idea of supporting your fellow brothers and sisters in arms, is to tell hand their next of kin a flag and tell them "on behalf of a grateful nation'?
How about next time you tell them on behalf of a not so grateful Israeli nation instead, as that is the truth of it.
BTW, Did you know that Nixon sabotaged the 68 peace accords? Now that's a conspiracy that has been proven.......
Did you know that there are, and always have been conspiracies? 9-11 and the illegal wars are but 2 instances that you defend to no end.