BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Nah. I’m just speaking the truth.You are gaslighting yourself now.![]()
Obviously, that’s what has you so confused.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah. I’m just speaking the truth.You are gaslighting yourself now.![]()
Well, lots of dodos don't agree. If that happened in our towns here, the shooter's family would be wiped out.Sorry, but you can't shoot an unarmed person on your doorstep through a storm door for ringing the doorbell.
Even if it wasn't an accident and the kid was there to commit a crime...you cannot use deadly force against a thought crime...i.e. "he intended to break in".
There must be an overt act of violence that causes fear of death or grievous bodily harm OR a forcible break in must have already occurred and the perpetrator is in the home...or the forced home invasion must be in progress...as in someone is kicking down your door.
And even in those cases, the moment the threat is ended or the unarmed perpetrator begins to flee or retreat, the rationale for use of deadly force is terminated.
There is no such thing as legal preemptive lethal force application.
This is the law in Missouri...Castle Doctrine and all. If you own a firearm for self protection in Missouri, you had better understand it.
There is no evidence for the story that the kid mistakenly went to the wrong house.
Some 16.year Olds are over 6 feet tall. Not enough information.Sorry, but you can't shoot an unarmed person on your doorstep through a storm door for ringing the doorbell.
Even if it wasn't an accident and the kid was there to commit a crime...you cannot use deadly force against a thought crime...i.e. "he intended to break in".
There must be an overt act of violence that causes fear of death or grievous bodily harm OR a forcible break in must have already occurred and the perpetrator is in the home...or the forced home invasion must be in progress...as in someone is kicking down your door.
And even in those cases, the moment the threat is ended or the unarmed perpetrator begins to flee or retreat, the rationale for use of deadly force is terminated.
There is no such thing as legal preemptive lethal force application.
This is the law in Missouri...Castle Doctrine and all. If you own a firearm for self protection in Missouri, you had better understand it.
Man, oh man. A thug comes to your door and gets three and a half million dollars for his con game, and the homeowner goes to jail for protecting his family from the con artist who had no business for pushing the homeowner's buttons. Woo hoo...There is no evidence for the story that the kid mistakenly went to the wrong house. The lawyers made that up. This was an attempted burglary. The black "victim" has collected $3.4 million so far.
MSN
www.msn.com
Defense failed in proving that. Tough.Some 16.year Olds are over 6 feet tall. Not enough information.
Man, oh man. A thug comes to your door and gets three and a half million dollars for his con game, and the homeowner goes to jail for protecting his family from the con artist who had no business for pushing the homeowner's buttons. Woo hoo...![]()
You can protect your home, you just can't use deadly force for a property crime (exception: Texas, after dark).So you can't protect your home legally in Missouri? hmmmm....
That's some misrepresentation of what actually occurred :-(Some 16.year Olds are over 6 feet tall. Not enough information.
Man, oh man. A thug comes to your door and gets three and a half million dollars for his con game, and the homeowner goes to jail for protecting his family from the con artist who had no business for pushing the homeowner's buttons. Woo hoo...![]()
I failed to repeat the noise of each historical detail of this saga that was the words of others? I assume anyone who read it didn't have to see the same details in my post.That's some misrepresentation of what actually occurred :-(
Trully, we cannot see the other person's recent life experiences such as getting mugged in an almost empty parking lot by frightening crime groupies or masked clown-dressed criminals carrying guns and machetes to force them to hand over the contents of their wallets; adversaries lying about a crime actually perpetrated by themselves but telling authorities we, not they stole expensive jewelry and were returning it to investigators when caught by way of cops noticing auto license numbers recorded near the shop they stole all of it from, and were injured by the perpetrators who were frightened by their own ahadows.The 'noise', beautress, includes the man had no legal defense to fire at someone through the door with fear of life or injury.
So show us the evidence supporting the thug's story. All we have so far is what the thug says and he wants money.The media did look into it. So did the police. And that is why that man was charged with 2 felonies.
HAHAHA. The board notes all you have is namecalling. Even you know the black cop who killed ashli was in the wrong and deserves to hang.your bigotry is on open display here.
That's the media story and fools like you accept it blindly.Sorry, but you can't shoot an unarmed person on your doorstep through a storm door for ringing the doorbell.
There is no evidence for the story that the kid mistakenly went to the wrong house. The lawyers made that up. This was an attempted burglary. The black "victim" has collected $3.4 million so far.
MSN
www.msn.com
Yup - this is yet another black scam. The thug was hoping for an altercation.Man, oh man. A thug comes to your door and gets three and a half million dollars for his con game, and the homeowner goes to jail for protecting his family from the con artist who had no business for pushing the homeowner's buttons. Woo hoo...![]()