8 In 10 Black Americans View Trump As ‘A Racist,’ Poll Finds

You will NEVER be able to post a shred of the evidence that you claim those blacks saw. You have not seen a shred of evidence either, which is why you will NEVER be able to post a shred of any such evidence here.

You should claim that you saw the evidence that IM2 posted in his secret spot, since he will never reveal the secret place on this forum where he claims he posted evidence. Since nobody will ever see the evidence that IM2 claims to have posted, you could claim that you saw it. This dishonest tactic could help you save face after not being able to post a shred of evidence yourself.

Doesn't something feel a little "off" about claiming those blacks saw something that they did not? Something that you have never seen either? Something that you cannot post here for the world to see? If you are so convinced that they saw evidence that proves trump is a racist, why can't you post it here for all to see?

Fool did you just starting listening to Trump this morning. We have almost 5yrs of evidence. The guy has been sued for his racism.
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...

Why, would you mind then?
I don't really mind that he picked 5 years for his arbitrary number, I was just curious why he picked 5 and not some other number. It doesn't really matter what number he picks, since he is NEVER going to post a shred of evidence that proves Trump is a racist, and he will go on claiming that it exists. No lefty has ever seen such evidence, which is why no lefty will ever post it.
I don't mind if his racism is on par with yours.

How do you feel about your political class hiding what was coming from the public while they got their insider trading all in order?
His inability to post evidence that does not exist doesn't make him a racist, nor does his faith that those who answered the opening post poll saw evidence. He just wants very much to believe Trump is a racist. Please clarify what racism he is "on par" with.

As for the insider trading, just ask me in a thread that is about that. The only thing discussion of insider trading can do in a thread like this one is to divert attention away from the fact that none of the blacks in the opening post poll have seen ANY evidence that proves trump is a racist. Since you brought it up, I assume you have zero intent to provide evidence that proves Trump is a racist either. Your diversion was meant to protect the lefty who couldn't answer my question.
 
I guess you think if you keep repeating that bullshit it might come true.

We judge him by his OWN words and ACTIONS. Fools like you could hear him call black folks the Nword on national TV and you would come right back on here spewing that same bullshit you are ripping off to us now.

It reminds me of how fools like you were shouting that same garbage during the CR Movement.
You will NEVER be able to post a shred of the evidence that you claim those blacks saw. You have not seen a shred of evidence either, which is why you will NEVER be able to post a shred of any such evidence here.

You should claim that you saw the evidence that IM2 posted in his secret spot, since he will never reveal the secret place on this forum where he claims he posted evidence. Since nobody will ever see the evidence that IM2 claims to have posted, you could claim that you saw it. This dishonest tactic could help you save face after not being able to post a shred of evidence yourself.

Doesn't something feel a little "off" about claiming those blacks saw something that they did not? Something that you have never seen either? Something that you cannot post here for the world to see? If you are so convinced that they saw evidence that proves trump is a racist, why can't you post it here for all to see?

Fool did you just starting listening to Trump this morning. We have almost 5yrs of evidence. The guy has been sued for his racism.
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...

Why, would you mind then?
I don't really mind that he picked 5 years for his arbitrary number, I was just curious why he picked 5 and not some other number. It doesn't really matter what number he picks, since he is NEVER going to post a shred of evidence that proves Trump is a racist, and he will go on claiming that it exists. No lefty has ever seen such evidence, which is why no lefty will ever post it.

He's just parroting rubbish somebody else pulled out of their ass. Like all black racists, he's just crying for Whitey to give them more bennies and stuff, since they've been complete failures at running anything they were handed on a silver platter, their own cities, school systems, entire counties in some cases, all disasters, every last one of them. they're like whinny little infants, crying for attention and for a sugar daddy to save them once again.
 
You will NEVER be able to post a shred of the evidence that you claim those blacks saw. You have not seen a shred of evidence either, which is why you will NEVER be able to post a shred of any such evidence here.

You should claim that you saw the evidence that IM2 posted in his secret spot, since he will never reveal the secret place on this forum where he claims he posted evidence. Since nobody will ever see the evidence that IM2 claims to have posted, you could claim that you saw it. This dishonest tactic could help you save face after not being able to post a shred of evidence yourself.

Doesn't something feel a little "off" about claiming those blacks saw something that they did not? Something that you have never seen either? Something that you cannot post here for the world to see? If you are so convinced that they saw evidence that proves trump is a racist, why can't you post it here for all to see?

Fool did you just starting listening to Trump this morning. We have almost 5yrs of evidence. The guy has been sued for his racism.
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...

Why, would you mind then?
I don't really mind that he picked 5 years for his arbitrary number, I was just curious why he picked 5 and not some other number. It doesn't really matter what number he picks, since he is NEVER going to post a shred of evidence that proves Trump is a racist, and he will go on claiming that it exists. No lefty has ever seen such evidence, which is why no lefty will ever post it.

He's just parroting rubbish somebody else pulled out of their ass. Like all black racists, he's just crying for Whitey to give them more bennies and stuff, since they've been complete failures at running anything they were handed on a silver platter, their own cities, school systems, entire counties in some cases, all disasters, every last one of them. they're like whinny little infants, crying for attention and for a sugar daddy to save them once again.

You just describe Don's kids.
 
Fool did you just starting listening to Trump this morning. We have almost 5yrs of evidence. The guy has been sued for his racism.
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...

Why, would you mind then?
I don't really mind that he picked 5 years for his arbitrary number, I was just curious why he picked 5 and not some other number. It doesn't really matter what number he picks, since he is NEVER going to post a shred of evidence that proves Trump is a racist, and he will go on claiming that it exists. No lefty has ever seen such evidence, which is why no lefty will ever post it.

He's just parroting rubbish somebody else pulled out of their ass. Like all black racists, he's just crying for Whitey to give them more bennies and stuff, since they've been complete failures at running anything they were handed on a silver platter, their own cities, school systems, entire counties in some cases, all disasters, every last one of them. they're like whinny little infants, crying for attention and for a sugar daddy to save them once again.

You just describe Don's kids.

Don King's? Nah, King was a patriot, and like James Brown loved America, and had little empathy for whiners like yourself.
 
What is clear about the poll that this thread is about, is that none of the blacks who answered that they view Trump is a racist have EVER seen a shred of evidence that proves Trump is a racist.

I guess you think if you keep repeating that bullshit it might come true.

The most they could ever have seen would be allegations, propaganda, dismissed cases, secondhand quote, or gish gallop. Just non evidence crap like IM2 Superbadbrutha candycorn rightwinger and Asclepias resort to instead of actual evidence.

We judge him by his OWN words and ACTIONS. Fools like you could hear him call black folks the Nword on national TV and you would come right back on here spewing that same bullshit you are ripping off to us now.

It reminds me of how fools like you were shouting that same garbage during the CR Movement.
You will NEVER be able to post a shred of the evidence that you claim those blacks saw. You have not seen a shred of evidence either, which is why you will NEVER be able to post a shred of any such evidence here.

You should claim that you saw the evidence that IM2 posted in his secret spot, since he will never reveal the secret place on this forum where he claims he posted evidence. Since nobody will ever see the evidence that IM2 claims to have posted, you could claim that you saw it. This dishonest tactic could help you save face after not being able to post a shred of evidence yourself.

Doesn't something feel a little "off" about claiming those blacks saw something that they did not? Something that you have never seen either? Something that you cannot post here for the world to see? If you are so convinced that they saw evidence that proves trump is a racist, why can't you post it here for all to see?

Fool did you just starting listening to Trump this morning. We have almost 5yrs of evidence. The guy has been sued for his racism.
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...


Are you really that slow.

- In May, Trump implied that Gonzalo Curiel, the federal judge presiding over a class action against the for-profit Trump University, could not fairly hear the case because of his Mexican heritage.

He’s a Mexican,” Trump told CNN of Curiel. “We’re building a wall between here and Mexico. The answer is, he is giving us very unfair rulings — rulings that people can’t even believe.”

Curiel, it should be noted, is an American citizen who was born in Indiana. And as a prosecutor in the late 1990s, he went after Mexican drug cartels, making him a target for assassination by a Tijuana drug lord.

Even members of Trump’s own party slammed the racist remarks.

“Claiming a person can’t do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment,” House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a reaction to Trump’s comments, though he clarified that he still endorses the nominee.

- When Trump was serving as the president of his family’s real estate company, the Trump Management Corporation, in 1973, the Justice Department sued the company for alleged racial discrimination against black people looking to rent apartments in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island.

The lawsuit charged that the company quoted different rental terms and conditions to black rental candidates than it did with white candidates, and that the company lied to black applicants about apartments not being available. Trump called those accusations “absolutely ridiculous” and sued the Justice Department for $100 million in damages for defamation.

Without admitting wrongdoing, the Trump Management Corporation settled the original lawsuit two years later and promised not to discriminate against black people, Puerto Ricans or other minorities. Trump also agreed to send weekly vacancy lists for his 15,000 apartments to the New York Urban League, a civil rights group, and to allow the NYUL to present qualified applicants for vacancies in certain Trump properties.

Just three years after that, the Justice Department sued the Trump Management Corporation again for allegedly discriminating against black applicants by telling them apartments weren’t available.


-
Workers at Trump’s casinos in Atlantic City, New Jersey, have accused him of racism over the years. The New Jersey Casino Control Commission fined the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino $200,000 in 1992 because managers would remove African-American card dealers at the request of a certain big-spending gambler. A state appeals court upheld the fine.

The first-person account of at least one black Trump casino employee in Atlantic City suggests the racist practices were consistent with Trump’s personal behavior toward black workers.

“When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” Kip Brown, a former employee at Trump’s Castle, told the New Yorker for a September article. “It was the eighties, I was a teen-ager, but I remember it: they put us all in the back.”

Trump disparaged his black casino employees as “lazy” in vividly bigoted terms, according to a 1991 book by John O’Donnell, a former president of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino.

“And isn’t it funny. I’ve got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it,” O’Donnell recalled Trump saying. “The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.”

“I think the guy is lazy,” Trump said of a black employee, according to O’Donnell. “And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.”

Trump has also faced charges of reneging on commitments to hire black people. In 1996, 20 African Americans in Indiana sued Trump for failing to honor a promise to hire mostly minority workers for a riverboat casino on Lake Michigan.

- When asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper if he would condemn Duke and say he didn’t want a vote from him or any other white supremacists, Trump claimed that he didn’t know anything about white supremacists or about Duke himself. When Tapper pressed him twice more, Trump said he couldn’t condemn a group he hadn’t yet researched.

By Feb. 29, Trump was saying that in fact he does disavow Duke, and that the only reason he didn’t do so on CNN was because of a “lousy earpiece.” Video of the exchange, however, shows Trump responding quickly to Tapper’s questions with no apparent difficulty in hearing.


- Long before calling Mexican immigrants “criminals” and “rapists,” Trump was a leading proponent of “birtherism,” the racist conspiracy theory that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and is thus an illegitimate president. Trump claimed in 2011 to have sent people to Hawaii to investigate whether Obama was really born there. He insisted at the time that the researchers “cannot believe what they are finding.”

Obama ultimately got the better of Trump, releasing his long-form birth certificate and relentlessly mocking the real estate mogul about it at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner that year.

But Trump continues to insinuate that the president was not born in the country.

“I don’t know where he was born,” Trump said in a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February 2015. (Again, for the record: He was born in Hawaii.)

- Calling black NFL players mothers SOBs,

- He encouraged the mob justice that resulted in the wrongful imprisonment of the Central Park Five.
In 1989, Trump took out full-page ads in four New York City-area newspapers calling for the return of the death penalty in New York and the expansion of police authority in response to the infamous case of a woman who was beaten and raped while jogging in Manhattan’s Central Park.

The men’s convictions were overturned in 2002, after they’d already spent years in prison, when DNA evidence showed they did not commit the crime. Today, their case is considered a cautionary tale about a politicized criminal justice process.

Trump, however, still thinks the men are guilty.

He isn't even man enough to admit he was wrong as hell.

I could go on posting, but I know in your eyes none of that stuff is racist, is it.
 
You will NEVER be able to post a shred of the evidence that you claim those blacks saw. You have not seen a shred of evidence either, which is why you will NEVER be able to post a shred of any such evidence here.

You should claim that you saw the evidence that IM2 posted in his secret spot, since he will never reveal the secret place on this forum where he claims he posted evidence. Since nobody will ever see the evidence that IM2 claims to have posted, you could claim that you saw it. This dishonest tactic could help you save face after not being able to post a shred of evidence yourself.

Doesn't something feel a little "off" about claiming those blacks saw something that they did not? Something that you have never seen either? Something that you cannot post here for the world to see? If you are so convinced that they saw evidence that proves trump is a racist, why can't you post it here for all to see?

Fool did you just starting listening to Trump this morning. We have almost 5yrs of evidence. The guy has been sued for his racism.
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...

Why, would you mind then?
I don't really mind that he picked 5 years for his arbitrary number, I was just curious why he picked 5 and not some other number. It doesn't really matter what number he picks, since he is NEVER going to post a shred of evidence that proves Trump is a racist, and he will go on claiming that it exists. No lefty has ever seen such evidence, which is why no lefty will ever post it.

He's just parroting rubbish somebody else pulled out of their ass. Like all black racists, he's just crying for Whitey to give them more bennies and stuff, since they've been complete failures at running anything they were handed on a silver platter, their own cities, school systems, entire counties in some cases, all disasters, every last one of them. they're like whinny little infants, crying for attention and for a sugar daddy to save them once again.

Only in the minds of racist, ass clowns like you. When you don't get a job the excuse is, "a black man got it because of AA." You just can't admit that the black man was smarter or more experienced than you are. Blaming someone else for you failures has always been the tactic of racist fools like you.
 
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...

Why, would you mind then?
I don't really mind that he picked 5 years for his arbitrary number, I was just curious why he picked 5 and not some other number. It doesn't really matter what number he picks, since he is NEVER going to post a shred of evidence that proves Trump is a racist, and he will go on claiming that it exists. No lefty has ever seen such evidence, which is why no lefty will ever post it.

He's just parroting rubbish somebody else pulled out of their ass. Like all black racists, he's just crying for Whitey to give them more bennies and stuff, since they've been complete failures at running anything they were handed on a silver platter, their own cities, school systems, entire counties in some cases, all disasters, every last one of them. they're like whinny little infants, crying for attention and for a sugar daddy to save them once again.

You just describe Don's kids.

Don King's? Nah, King was a patriot, and like James Brown loved America, and had little empathy for whiners like yourself.

Racist clowns like you hated James Brown when he said, "Say it loud, I'm black and I'm proud." James Brown was a huge proponent of Civil Rights and Equality. It's amazing how the racist love a black man after he is dead.
 
What is clear about the poll that this thread is about, is that none of the blacks who answered that they view Trump is a racist have EVER seen a shred of evidence that proves Trump is a racist.

I guess you think if you keep repeating that bullshit it might come true.

The most they could ever have seen would be allegations, propaganda, dismissed cases, secondhand quote, or gish gallop. Just non evidence crap like IM2 Superbadbrutha candycorn rightwinger and Asclepias resort to instead of actual evidence.

We judge him by his OWN words and ACTIONS. Fools like you could hear him call black folks the Nword on national TV and you would come right back on here spewing that same bullshit you are ripping off to us now.

It reminds me of how fools like you were shouting that same garbage during the CR Movement.
You will NEVER be able to post a shred of the evidence that you claim those blacks saw. You have not seen a shred of evidence either, which is why you will NEVER be able to post a shred of any such evidence here.

You should claim that you saw the evidence that IM2 posted in his secret spot, since he will never reveal the secret place on this forum where he claims he posted evidence. Since nobody will ever see the evidence that IM2 claims to have posted, you could claim that you saw it. This dishonest tactic could help you save face after not being able to post a shred of evidence yourself.

Doesn't something feel a little "off" about claiming those blacks saw something that they did not? Something that you have never seen either? Something that you cannot post here for the world to see? If you are so convinced that they saw evidence that proves trump is a racist, why can't you post it here for all to see?

Fool did you just starting listening to Trump this morning. We have almost 5yrs of evidence. The guy has been sued for his racism.
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...


Are you really that slow.

- In May, Trump implied that Gonzalo Curiel, the federal judge presiding over a class action against the for-profit Trump University, could not fairly hear the case because of his Mexican heritage.

He’s a Mexican,” Trump told CNN of Curiel. “We’re building a wall between here and Mexico. The answer is, he is giving us very unfair rulings — rulings that people can’t even believe.”

Curiel, it should be noted, is an American citizen who was born in Indiana. And as a prosecutor in the late 1990s, he went after Mexican drug cartels, making him a target for assassination by a Tijuana drug lord.

Even members of Trump’s own party slammed the racist remarks.

“Claiming a person can’t do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment,” House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a reaction to Trump’s comments, though he clarified that he still endorses the nominee.

- When Trump was serving as the president of his family’s real estate company, the Trump Management Corporation, in 1973, the Justice Department sued the company for alleged racial discrimination against black people looking to rent apartments in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island.

The lawsuit charged that the company quoted different rental terms and conditions to black rental candidates than it did with white candidates, and that the company lied to black applicants about apartments not being available. Trump called those accusations “absolutely ridiculous” and sued the Justice Department for $100 million in damages for defamation.

Without admitting wrongdoing, the Trump Management Corporation settled the original lawsuit two years later and promised not to discriminate against black people, Puerto Ricans or other minorities. Trump also agreed to send weekly vacancy lists for his 15,000 apartments to the New York Urban League, a civil rights group, and to allow the NYUL to present qualified applicants for vacancies in certain Trump properties.

Just three years after that, the Justice Department sued the Trump Management Corporation again for allegedly discriminating against black applicants by telling them apartments weren’t available.


-
Workers at Trump’s casinos in Atlantic City, New Jersey, have accused him of racism over the years. The New Jersey Casino Control Commission fined the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino $200,000 in 1992 because managers would remove African-American card dealers at the request of a certain big-spending gambler. A state appeals court upheld the fine.

The first-person account of at least one black Trump casino employee in Atlantic City suggests the racist practices were consistent with Trump’s personal behavior toward black workers.

“When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” Kip Brown, a former employee at Trump’s Castle, told the New Yorker for a September article. “It was the eighties, I was a teen-ager, but I remember it: they put us all in the back.”

Trump disparaged his black casino employees as “lazy” in vividly bigoted terms, according to a 1991 book by John O’Donnell, a former president of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino.

“And isn’t it funny. I’ve got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it,” O’Donnell recalled Trump saying. “The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.”

“I think the guy is lazy,” Trump said of a black employee, according to O’Donnell. “And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.”

Trump has also faced charges of reneging on commitments to hire black people. In 1996, 20 African Americans in Indiana sued Trump for failing to honor a promise to hire mostly minority workers for a riverboat casino on Lake Michigan.

- When asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper if he would condemn Duke and say he didn’t want a vote from him or any other white supremacists, Trump claimed that he didn’t know anything about white supremacists or about Duke himself. When Tapper pressed him twice more, Trump said he couldn’t condemn a group he hadn’t yet researched.

By Feb. 29, Trump was saying that in fact he does disavow Duke, and that the only reason he didn’t do so on CNN was because of a “lousy earpiece.” Video of the exchange, however, shows Trump responding quickly to Tapper’s questions with no apparent difficulty in hearing.


- Long before calling Mexican immigrants “criminals” and “rapists,” Trump was a leading proponent of “birtherism,” the racist conspiracy theory that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and is thus an illegitimate president. Trump claimed in 2011 to have sent people to Hawaii to investigate whether Obama was really born there. He insisted at the time that the researchers “cannot believe what they are finding.”

Obama ultimately got the better of Trump, releasing his long-form birth certificate and relentlessly mocking the real estate mogul about it at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner that year.

But Trump continues to insinuate that the president was not born in the country.

“I don’t know where he was born,” Trump said in a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February 2015. (Again, for the record: He was born in Hawaii.)

- Calling black NFL players mothers SOBs,

- He encouraged the mob justice that resulted in the wrongful imprisonment of the Central Park Five.
In 1989, Trump took out full-page ads in four New York City-area newspapers calling for the return of the death penalty in New York and the expansion of police authority in response to the infamous case of a woman who was beaten and raped while jogging in Manhattan’s Central Park.

The men’s convictions were overturned in 2002, after they’d already spent years in prison, when DNA evidence showed they did not commit the crime. Today, their case is considered a cautionary tale about a politicized criminal justice process.

Trump, however, still thinks the men are guilty.

He isn't even man enough to admit he was wrong as hell.

I could go on posting, but I know in your eyes none of that stuff is racist, is it.
You just posted gish gallop in its purest form, and gish gallop is not evidence of anything. I would love to see some actual evidence, so please isolate a single item from the gish gallop and post it with an explanation of how it proves Trump is a racist. Since we are talking about racism here, make sure to identify which race is being targeted as well.

I'll help you out with the first item on your gish gallop list, since your lefty friends are not going to be helping you on this. Your first item referred to Mexicans and a Mexican judge, but Mexican is a natonality instead of a race. If you review the list of 5 races recognized by the US Census, you will not find Mexicans, women, chinese, or Muslims.

Remember that gish gallop is not evidence, so you will need to isolate you example from the gish gallop.

Here is what wiki has to say about gish gallop:

Gish gallop - Wikipedia

Gish gallop


The Gish gallop is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments. The term was coined by Eugenie Scott and named after the creationist Duane Gish, who used the technique frequently against proponents of evolution.[1][2]
 
What is clear about the poll that this thread is about, is that none of the blacks who answered that they view Trump is a racist have EVER seen a shred of evidence that proves Trump is a racist.

I guess you think if you keep repeating that bullshit it might come true.

The most they could ever have seen would be allegations, propaganda, dismissed cases, secondhand quote, or gish gallop. Just non evidence crap like IM2 Superbadbrutha candycorn rightwinger and Asclepias resort to instead of actual evidence.

We judge him by his OWN words and ACTIONS. Fools like you could hear him call black folks the Nword on national TV and you would come right back on here spewing that same bullshit you are ripping off to us now.

It reminds me of how fools like you were shouting that same garbage during the CR Movement.
You will NEVER be able to post a shred of the evidence that you claim those blacks saw. You have not seen a shred of evidence either, which is why you will NEVER be able to post a shred of any such evidence here.

You should claim that you saw the evidence that IM2 posted in his secret spot, since he will never reveal the secret place on this forum where he claims he posted evidence. Since nobody will ever see the evidence that IM2 claims to have posted, you could claim that you saw it. This dishonest tactic could help you save face after not being able to post a shred of evidence yourself.

Doesn't something feel a little "off" about claiming those blacks saw something that they did not? Something that you have never seen either? Something that you cannot post here for the world to see? If you are so convinced that they saw evidence that proves trump is a racist, why can't you post it here for all to see?

Fool did you just starting listening to Trump this morning. We have almost 5yrs of evidence. The guy has been sued for his racism.
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...


Are you really that slow.

- In May, Trump implied that Gonzalo Curiel, the federal judge presiding over a class action against the for-profit Trump University, could not fairly hear the case because of his Mexican heritage.

He’s a Mexican,” Trump told CNN of Curiel. “We’re building a wall between here and Mexico. The answer is, he is giving us very unfair rulings — rulings that people can’t even believe.”

Curiel, it should be noted, is an American citizen who was born in Indiana. And as a prosecutor in the late 1990s, he went after Mexican drug cartels, making him a target for assassination by a Tijuana drug lord.

Even members of Trump’s own party slammed the racist remarks.

“Claiming a person can’t do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment,” House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a reaction to Trump’s comments, though he clarified that he still endorses the nominee.

- When Trump was serving as the president of his family’s real estate company, the Trump Management Corporation, in 1973, the Justice Department sued the company for alleged racial discrimination against black people looking to rent apartments in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island.

The lawsuit charged that the company quoted different rental terms and conditions to black rental candidates than it did with white candidates, and that the company lied to black applicants about apartments not being available. Trump called those accusations “absolutely ridiculous” and sued the Justice Department for $100 million in damages for defamation.

Without admitting wrongdoing, the Trump Management Corporation settled the original lawsuit two years later and promised not to discriminate against black people, Puerto Ricans or other minorities. Trump also agreed to send weekly vacancy lists for his 15,000 apartments to the New York Urban League, a civil rights group, and to allow the NYUL to present qualified applicants for vacancies in certain Trump properties.

Just three years after that, the Justice Department sued the Trump Management Corporation again for allegedly discriminating against black applicants by telling them apartments weren’t available.


-
Workers at Trump’s casinos in Atlantic City, New Jersey, have accused him of racism over the years. The New Jersey Casino Control Commission fined the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino $200,000 in 1992 because managers would remove African-American card dealers at the request of a certain big-spending gambler. A state appeals court upheld the fine.

The first-person account of at least one black Trump casino employee in Atlantic City suggests the racist practices were consistent with Trump’s personal behavior toward black workers.

“When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” Kip Brown, a former employee at Trump’s Castle, told the New Yorker for a September article. “It was the eighties, I was a teen-ager, but I remember it: they put us all in the back.”

Trump disparaged his black casino employees as “lazy” in vividly bigoted terms, according to a 1991 book by John O’Donnell, a former president of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino.

“And isn’t it funny. I’ve got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it,” O’Donnell recalled Trump saying. “The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.”

“I think the guy is lazy,” Trump said of a black employee, according to O’Donnell. “And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.”

Trump has also faced charges of reneging on commitments to hire black people. In 1996, 20 African Americans in Indiana sued Trump for failing to honor a promise to hire mostly minority workers for a riverboat casino on Lake Michigan.

- When asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper if he would condemn Duke and say he didn’t want a vote from him or any other white supremacists, Trump claimed that he didn’t know anything about white supremacists or about Duke himself. When Tapper pressed him twice more, Trump said he couldn’t condemn a group he hadn’t yet researched.

By Feb. 29, Trump was saying that in fact he does disavow Duke, and that the only reason he didn’t do so on CNN was because of a “lousy earpiece.” Video of the exchange, however, shows Trump responding quickly to Tapper’s questions with no apparent difficulty in hearing.


- Long before calling Mexican immigrants “criminals” and “rapists,” Trump was a leading proponent of “birtherism,” the racist conspiracy theory that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and is thus an illegitimate president. Trump claimed in 2011 to have sent people to Hawaii to investigate whether Obama was really born there. He insisted at the time that the researchers “cannot believe what they are finding.”

Obama ultimately got the better of Trump, releasing his long-form birth certificate and relentlessly mocking the real estate mogul about it at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner that year.

But Trump continues to insinuate that the president was not born in the country.

“I don’t know where he was born,” Trump said in a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February 2015. (Again, for the record: He was born in Hawaii.)

- Calling black NFL players mothers SOBs,

- He encouraged the mob justice that resulted in the wrongful imprisonment of the Central Park Five.
In 1989, Trump took out full-page ads in four New York City-area newspapers calling for the return of the death penalty in New York and the expansion of police authority in response to the infamous case of a woman who was beaten and raped while jogging in Manhattan’s Central Park.

The men’s convictions were overturned in 2002, after they’d already spent years in prison, when DNA evidence showed they did not commit the crime. Today, their case is considered a cautionary tale about a politicized criminal justice process.

Trump, however, still thinks the men are guilty.

He isn't even man enough to admit he was wrong as hell.

I could go on posting, but I know in your eyes none of that stuff is racist, is it.
I am glad you have taken the effort to actually post some evidence that proves Trump is a racist, even though you have posted gish gallop instead. I really do want to see actual evidence that proves Trump is a racist, so I'd like to assist you in being the first lefty to do so. Here are some tips that will help you narrow down your search:

If you review this thread, you will see that I have posted a list of items that are NOT evidence. Have you seen this list that I have posted dozens of times? Allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or claims to have already posted evidence.

Allegations: see what it says about proof
al·le·ga·tion
/ˌaləˈɡāSH(ə)n/

noun
plural noun: allegations
  1. a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof.
--------------------------
Dismissed cases:

Obviously, dismissed cases are the LAST thing that should EVER be presented as evidence. Here is an example of what a dismissed case looks like, notice where I have added bold to the words of the court:


"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

----------------------------

Secondhand quotes:
Obviously, if somebody claims Trump said something, it is not the same as Trump saying it, so it is not proof. Look at the quote below and identify who exactly is making the statement:

“When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” Kip Brown, a former employee at Trump’s Castle, told the New Yorker for a September article. “It was the eighties, I was a teen-ager, but I remember it: they put us all in the back.”

This quote belongs to somebody named Kip Brown.
 
Last edited:
I guess you think if you keep repeating that bullshit it might come true.

We judge him by his OWN words and ACTIONS. Fools like you could hear him call black folks the Nword on national TV and you would come right back on here spewing that same bullshit you are ripping off to us now.

It reminds me of how fools like you were shouting that same garbage during the CR Movement.
You will NEVER be able to post a shred of the evidence that you claim those blacks saw. You have not seen a shred of evidence either, which is why you will NEVER be able to post a shred of any such evidence here.

You should claim that you saw the evidence that IM2 posted in his secret spot, since he will never reveal the secret place on this forum where he claims he posted evidence. Since nobody will ever see the evidence that IM2 claims to have posted, you could claim that you saw it. This dishonest tactic could help you save face after not being able to post a shred of evidence yourself.

Doesn't something feel a little "off" about claiming those blacks saw something that they did not? Something that you have never seen either? Something that you cannot post here for the world to see? If you are so convinced that they saw evidence that proves trump is a racist, why can't you post it here for all to see?

Fool did you just starting listening to Trump this morning. We have almost 5yrs of evidence. The guy has been sued for his racism.
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...


Are you really that slow.

- In May, Trump implied that Gonzalo Curiel, the federal judge presiding over a class action against the for-profit Trump University, could not fairly hear the case because of his Mexican heritage.

He’s a Mexican,” Trump told CNN of Curiel. “We’re building a wall between here and Mexico. The answer is, he is giving us very unfair rulings — rulings that people can’t even believe.”

Curiel, it should be noted, is an American citizen who was born in Indiana. And as a prosecutor in the late 1990s, he went after Mexican drug cartels, making him a target for assassination by a Tijuana drug lord.

Even members of Trump’s own party slammed the racist remarks.

“Claiming a person can’t do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment,” House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a reaction to Trump’s comments, though he clarified that he still endorses the nominee.

- When Trump was serving as the president of his family’s real estate company, the Trump Management Corporation, in 1973, the Justice Department sued the company for alleged racial discrimination against black people looking to rent apartments in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island.

The lawsuit charged that the company quoted different rental terms and conditions to black rental candidates than it did with white candidates, and that the company lied to black applicants about apartments not being available. Trump called those accusations “absolutely ridiculous” and sued the Justice Department for $100 million in damages for defamation.

Without admitting wrongdoing, the Trump Management Corporation settled the original lawsuit two years later and promised not to discriminate against black people, Puerto Ricans or other minorities. Trump also agreed to send weekly vacancy lists for his 15,000 apartments to the New York Urban League, a civil rights group, and to allow the NYUL to present qualified applicants for vacancies in certain Trump properties.

Just three years after that, the Justice Department sued the Trump Management Corporation again for allegedly discriminating against black applicants by telling them apartments weren’t available.


-
Workers at Trump’s casinos in Atlantic City, New Jersey, have accused him of racism over the years. The New Jersey Casino Control Commission fined the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino $200,000 in 1992 because managers would remove African-American card dealers at the request of a certain big-spending gambler. A state appeals court upheld the fine.

The first-person account of at least one black Trump casino employee in Atlantic City suggests the racist practices were consistent with Trump’s personal behavior toward black workers.

“When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” Kip Brown, a former employee at Trump’s Castle, told the New Yorker for a September article. “It was the eighties, I was a teen-ager, but I remember it: they put us all in the back.”

Trump disparaged his black casino employees as “lazy” in vividly bigoted terms, according to a 1991 book by John O’Donnell, a former president of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino.

“And isn’t it funny. I’ve got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it,” O’Donnell recalled Trump saying. “The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.”

“I think the guy is lazy,” Trump said of a black employee, according to O’Donnell. “And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.”

Trump has also faced charges of reneging on commitments to hire black people. In 1996, 20 African Americans in Indiana sued Trump for failing to honor a promise to hire mostly minority workers for a riverboat casino on Lake Michigan.

- When asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper if he would condemn Duke and say he didn’t want a vote from him or any other white supremacists, Trump claimed that he didn’t know anything about white supremacists or about Duke himself. When Tapper pressed him twice more, Trump said he couldn’t condemn a group he hadn’t yet researched.

By Feb. 29, Trump was saying that in fact he does disavow Duke, and that the only reason he didn’t do so on CNN was because of a “lousy earpiece.” Video of the exchange, however, shows Trump responding quickly to Tapper’s questions with no apparent difficulty in hearing.


- Long before calling Mexican immigrants “criminals” and “rapists,” Trump was a leading proponent of “birtherism,” the racist conspiracy theory that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and is thus an illegitimate president. Trump claimed in 2011 to have sent people to Hawaii to investigate whether Obama was really born there. He insisted at the time that the researchers “cannot believe what they are finding.”

Obama ultimately got the better of Trump, releasing his long-form birth certificate and relentlessly mocking the real estate mogul about it at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner that year.

But Trump continues to insinuate that the president was not born in the country.

“I don’t know where he was born,” Trump said in a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February 2015. (Again, for the record: He was born in Hawaii.)

- Calling black NFL players mothers SOBs,

- He encouraged the mob justice that resulted in the wrongful imprisonment of the Central Park Five.
In 1989, Trump took out full-page ads in four New York City-area newspapers calling for the return of the death penalty in New York and the expansion of police authority in response to the infamous case of a woman who was beaten and raped while jogging in Manhattan’s Central Park.

The men’s convictions were overturned in 2002, after they’d already spent years in prison, when DNA evidence showed they did not commit the crime. Today, their case is considered a cautionary tale about a politicized criminal justice process.

Trump, however, still thinks the men are guilty.

He isn't even man enough to admit he was wrong as hell.

I could go on posting, but I know in your eyes none of that stuff is racist, is it.
You just posted gish gallop in its purest form, and gish gallop is not evidence of anything. I would love to see some actual evidence, so please isolate a single item from the gish gallop and post it with an explanation of how it proves Trump is a racist. Since we are talking about racism here, make sure to identify which race is being targeted as well.

I'll help you out with the first item on your gish gallop list, since your lefty friends are not going to be helping you on this. Your first item referred to Mexicans and a Mexican judge, but Mexican is a natonality instead of a race. If you review the list of 5 races recognized by the US Census, you will not find Mexicans, women, chinese, or Muslims.

Remember that gish gallop is not evidence, so you will need to isolate you example from the gish gallop.

Here is what wiki has to say about gish gallop:

Gish gallop - Wikipedia

Gish gallop


The Gish gallop is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments. The term was coined by Eugenie Scott and named after the creationist Duane Gish, who used the technique frequently against proponents of evolution.[1][2]

Wow thats all you got for a comeback. You are a Trump Humpin POS, have a nice day.
 
You will NEVER be able to post a shred of the evidence that you claim those blacks saw. You have not seen a shred of evidence either, which is why you will NEVER be able to post a shred of any such evidence here.

You should claim that you saw the evidence that IM2 posted in his secret spot, since he will never reveal the secret place on this forum where he claims he posted evidence. Since nobody will ever see the evidence that IM2 claims to have posted, you could claim that you saw it. This dishonest tactic could help you save face after not being able to post a shred of evidence yourself.

Doesn't something feel a little "off" about claiming those blacks saw something that they did not? Something that you have never seen either? Something that you cannot post here for the world to see? If you are so convinced that they saw evidence that proves trump is a racist, why can't you post it here for all to see?

Fool did you just starting listening to Trump this morning. We have almost 5yrs of evidence. The guy has been sued for his racism.
If you are not going to post ANY evidence whatsoever, why pick 5 years of evidence? You could pick 10, 25, or 50 years, and it wouldn't make any difference if you can't post a single shred of evidence. You might as well just spin the wheel of fortune and claim however many years it lands on. Go on now, post something else besides evidence that proves Trump is a racist...


Are you really that slow.

- In May, Trump implied that Gonzalo Curiel, the federal judge presiding over a class action against the for-profit Trump University, could not fairly hear the case because of his Mexican heritage.

He’s a Mexican,” Trump told CNN of Curiel. “We’re building a wall between here and Mexico. The answer is, he is giving us very unfair rulings — rulings that people can’t even believe.”

Curiel, it should be noted, is an American citizen who was born in Indiana. And as a prosecutor in the late 1990s, he went after Mexican drug cartels, making him a target for assassination by a Tijuana drug lord.

Even members of Trump’s own party slammed the racist remarks.

“Claiming a person can’t do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment,” House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a reaction to Trump’s comments, though he clarified that he still endorses the nominee.

- When Trump was serving as the president of his family’s real estate company, the Trump Management Corporation, in 1973, the Justice Department sued the company for alleged racial discrimination against black people looking to rent apartments in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island.

The lawsuit charged that the company quoted different rental terms and conditions to black rental candidates than it did with white candidates, and that the company lied to black applicants about apartments not being available. Trump called those accusations “absolutely ridiculous” and sued the Justice Department for $100 million in damages for defamation.

Without admitting wrongdoing, the Trump Management Corporation settled the original lawsuit two years later and promised not to discriminate against black people, Puerto Ricans or other minorities. Trump also agreed to send weekly vacancy lists for his 15,000 apartments to the New York Urban League, a civil rights group, and to allow the NYUL to present qualified applicants for vacancies in certain Trump properties.

Just three years after that, the Justice Department sued the Trump Management Corporation again for allegedly discriminating against black applicants by telling them apartments weren’t available.


-
Workers at Trump’s casinos in Atlantic City, New Jersey, have accused him of racism over the years. The New Jersey Casino Control Commission fined the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino $200,000 in 1992 because managers would remove African-American card dealers at the request of a certain big-spending gambler. A state appeals court upheld the fine.

The first-person account of at least one black Trump casino employee in Atlantic City suggests the racist practices were consistent with Trump’s personal behavior toward black workers.

“When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” Kip Brown, a former employee at Trump’s Castle, told the New Yorker for a September article. “It was the eighties, I was a teen-ager, but I remember it: they put us all in the back.”

Trump disparaged his black casino employees as “lazy” in vividly bigoted terms, according to a 1991 book by John O’Donnell, a former president of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino.

“And isn’t it funny. I’ve got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it,” O’Donnell recalled Trump saying. “The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.”

“I think the guy is lazy,” Trump said of a black employee, according to O’Donnell. “And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.”

Trump has also faced charges of reneging on commitments to hire black people. In 1996, 20 African Americans in Indiana sued Trump for failing to honor a promise to hire mostly minority workers for a riverboat casino on Lake Michigan.

- When asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper if he would condemn Duke and say he didn’t want a vote from him or any other white supremacists, Trump claimed that he didn’t know anything about white supremacists or about Duke himself. When Tapper pressed him twice more, Trump said he couldn’t condemn a group he hadn’t yet researched.

By Feb. 29, Trump was saying that in fact he does disavow Duke, and that the only reason he didn’t do so on CNN was because of a “lousy earpiece.” Video of the exchange, however, shows Trump responding quickly to Tapper’s questions with no apparent difficulty in hearing.


- Long before calling Mexican immigrants “criminals” and “rapists,” Trump was a leading proponent of “birtherism,” the racist conspiracy theory that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and is thus an illegitimate president. Trump claimed in 2011 to have sent people to Hawaii to investigate whether Obama was really born there. He insisted at the time that the researchers “cannot believe what they are finding.”

Obama ultimately got the better of Trump, releasing his long-form birth certificate and relentlessly mocking the real estate mogul about it at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner that year.

But Trump continues to insinuate that the president was not born in the country.

“I don’t know where he was born,” Trump said in a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February 2015. (Again, for the record: He was born in Hawaii.)

- Calling black NFL players mothers SOBs,

- He encouraged the mob justice that resulted in the wrongful imprisonment of the Central Park Five.
In 1989, Trump took out full-page ads in four New York City-area newspapers calling for the return of the death penalty in New York and the expansion of police authority in response to the infamous case of a woman who was beaten and raped while jogging in Manhattan’s Central Park.

The men’s convictions were overturned in 2002, after they’d already spent years in prison, when DNA evidence showed they did not commit the crime. Today, their case is considered a cautionary tale about a politicized criminal justice process.

Trump, however, still thinks the men are guilty.

He isn't even man enough to admit he was wrong as hell.

I could go on posting, but I know in your eyes none of that stuff is racist, is it.
You just posted gish gallop in its purest form, and gish gallop is not evidence of anything. I would love to see some actual evidence, so please isolate a single item from the gish gallop and post it with an explanation of how it proves Trump is a racist. Since we are talking about racism here, make sure to identify which race is being targeted as well.

I'll help you out with the first item on your gish gallop list, since your lefty friends are not going to be helping you on this. Your first item referred to Mexicans and a Mexican judge, but Mexican is a natonality instead of a race. If you review the list of 5 races recognized by the US Census, you will not find Mexicans, women, chinese, or Muslims.

Remember that gish gallop is not evidence, so you will need to isolate you example from the gish gallop.

Here is what wiki has to say about gish gallop:

Gish gallop - Wikipedia

Gish gallop


The Gish gallop is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments. The term was coined by Eugenie Scott and named after the creationist Duane Gish, who used the technique frequently against proponents of evolution.[1][2]

Wow thats all you got for a comeback. You are a Trump Humpin POS, have a nice day.
Oh, come on. Don't fold so easily, I really DO want to see some actual evidence. You just need to make sure it really is evidence before you post it. I'm trying to help you here.

I'll save you a little time on the casino fine in the gish gallop that you posted, here is what Wikipedia has to say about it, take note of the last sentence:

Trump Plaza was fined $200,000 in 1991 by the*New Jersey Casino Control Commission*for moving African American and female employees from craps tables in order to accommodate high roller Robert LiButti, a mob figure and alleged*John Gotti*associate, who was said to fly into fits of racist rage when he was on losing streaks.[29]*There is no indication that Trump was ever questioned in that investigation, he was not held personally liable...
 
Last edited:
No you want to show how much of a foolish Trump Humper you are. Keep on Humpin.

Did he win or lose those lawsuits?


Pick a single item and present it here, and explain how it proves Trump is a racist. Please refrain from posting allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or claims to have already posted evidence.
 
No you want to show how much of a foolish Trump Humper you are. Keep on Humpin.

Did he win or lose those lawsuits?


Pick a single item and present it here, and explain how it proves Trump is a racist. Please refrain from posting allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or claims to have already posted evidence.

The guy has been sued for racial discrimination and it wasn't fucking dismissed fool.

The guy called black NFL players "Son of a bitches."

The guy accused a Judge of being dishonest because he is of Mexican descent.

Trump has a decades-old history of mistreating and stereotyping blacks folks.

When he was getting his start in business, he was sued by the Justice Department for refusing to rent apartments to black and Latino tenants. Are you telling us that is untrue?

The guy claimed Pres. Obama wasn't born in America, he was a large part of the Birther Movement. Are you telling us that is untrue.

He is has made it Ok to be an open racist in America again. The list goes on and on and you haven't disputed any of it.
 
No you want to show how much of a foolish Trump Humper you are. Keep on Humpin.

Did he win or lose those lawsuits?


Pick a single item and present it here, and explain how it proves Trump is a racist. Please refrain from posting allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or claims to have already posted evidence.

The guy has been sued for racial discrimination and it wasn't fucking dismissed fool.

The guy called black NFL players "Son of a bitches."

The guy accused a Judge of being dishonest because he is of Mexican descent.

Trump has a decades-old history of mistreating and stereotyping blacks folks.

When he was getting his start in business, he was sued by the Justice Department for refusing to rent apartments to black and Latino tenants. Are you telling us that is untrue?

The guy claimed Pres. Obama wasn't born in America, he was a large part of the Birther Movement. Are you telling us that is untrue.

He is has made it Ok to be an open racist in America again. The list goes on and on and you haven't disputed any of it.

You read about gish gallop in post 548, so you are fully aware of what gish gallop is, and you are fully aware that gish gallop in itself is not evidence anything. Continued use of gish gallop when you know it is not evidence of guilt shows weakness on your part, and it suggests that you intend to evade having to admit that you cannot find any real evidence to post.

The Gish gallop is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments.

Once you isolate a single item from you gish gallop list, explain how it is not an allegation, dismissed case, secondhand quote, or propaganda. If I am able to demonstrate how your proposed evidence of Trump's racism is only an allegation, dismissed case, secondhand quote, or propaganda, then it can't be considered evidence that proves trump is a racist. Please post evidence that proves Trump is a racist.
 
He is has made it Ok to be an open racist in America again. The list goes on and on and you haven't disputed any of it.

Once you isolate an item from your gish gallop list and post it here, I will put it to the test like the one I showed you in post 549. I can see items on the gish gallop list that won't pass the test, so you may want to pick an item to submit that at least passes the tests seen in post 549.

Posting real evidence that cannot be disputed is VERY simple, unless it does not exist. If you insist on posting allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, or propaganda instead, it shows that you cannot post real evidence that cannot be disputed. When you evade what I am saying about this in your next post it will make you look even weaker. Go on now, post something besides evidence that proves trump is a racist. Evade away.
 
Last edited:
He is has made it Ok to be an open racist in America again. The list goes on and on and you haven't disputed any of it.

Once you isolate an item from your gish gallop list and post it here, I will put it to the test like the one I showed you in post 549. I can see items on the gish gallop list that won't pass the test, so you may want to pick an item to submit that at least passes the tests seen in post 549.

Posting real evidence that cannot be disputed is VERY simple, unless it does not exist. If you insist on posting allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, or propaganda instead, it shows that you cannot post real evidence that cannot be disputed. When you evade what I am saying about this in your next post it will make you look even weaker. Go on now, post something besides evidence that proves trump is a racist. Evade away.

Please deal with the specific items I have listed.

The guy has been sued for racial discrimination and it wasn't fucking dismissed fool.

The guy called black NFL players "Son of a bitches."

The guy accused a Judge of being dishonest because he is of Mexican descent.

Trump has a decades-old history of mistreating and stereotyping blacks folks.

When he was getting his start in business, he was sued by the Justice Department for refusing to rent apartments to black and Latino tenants. Are you telling us that is untrue?

The guy claimed Pres. Obama wasn't born in America, he was a large part of the Birther Movement. Are you telling us that is untrue.

He is has made it Ok to be an open racist in America again. The list goes on and on and you haven't disputed any of it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top