- Aug 16, 2011
- 128,111
- 24,174
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #121
...We lost nobody on mainland Japan to do it. ...
That is also not correct.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
...We lost nobody on mainland Japan to do it. ...
The ... learned the hard way that you shouldn't fuck with the USA, didn't they?
What in the hell were those morons thinking? Play stupid games and get stupid prizes.
The stupid ... really cooked their goose at Okinawa. They thought it would be cool to fight to the last man and show the Americans that they would suffer heavy losses if they invaded. What could possibly go wrong? However, it didn't quite go as planned, did it? The lesson that the Americans learned was it would be better to just nuke the bastards.
Here we see the impressive scholarship of the Bud Light Breakfast Club type.
Then we see your impressive scholarly rantings of a surrender monkey.
You should have been Dutch. They surrendered to the Germans in a few hours.
The third option was a siege.I asked the same question but got no answerOther than unconditional surrender, what other option?
A fourth option was a demonstration of the bomb meant to be observed by japanese military leaders.
This debate will never be resolved.
That tired old story is banal speculation meant to avoid a difficult moral issue.The atomic bomb saved a million lives, including both American and Japanese
There was no moral issue for America. ....
I suspect changes may occur when WWII participants and their children are gone and future generations with little if any connection enters the debate.This debate will never be resolved.
Most likely so.
By all means ....
By all means ....
Go ahead and parrot your Leftist history revisionist crap.
...
I find it a bit disturbing how rarely Russia entering the war with Japan is brought up in these discussions. Plenty of scholars, from all sides, believe it was a key element in our decision for dropping the bombs and insisting on an immediate surrender. Russia rolled over Japanese forces in China and was fully prepared for invading mainland Japan.
That tired old story is banal speculation meant to avoid a difficult moral issue.The atomic bomb saved a million lives, including both American and Japanese
There was no moral issue for America. ....
Then you don't understand morality, and you don't understand what America stands for.
... could dish it but can't take it.
Oh well.
...
What does that mean in this context?
He was very willing to sacrifice millions of Russians for a piece of Japan, and Japanese occupied Korea.I find it a bit disturbing how rarely Russia entering the war with Japan is brought up in these discussions. Plenty of scholars, from all sides, believe it was a key element in our decision for dropping the bombs and insisting on an immediate surrender. Russia rolled over Japanese forces in China and was fully prepared for invading mainland Japan.
It must have been frustrating for Stalin to be forced to put the brakes on after stealing only a little territory. The Russians were still feeling humiliated from their not-so-distant ass kicking.
Just hit the highlights of international events involving the USNo, because history isn't something simple that fits on the back of a cereal box, except for simpletons who are incapable of anything more.
The japanese were not going to negotiate a surrender any more than they negotiated a peaceful settlement before they bombed Pearl HarborAnother option might have been pursuing the opportunity for a negotiated surrender long before all this, which would have saved untold numbers of American lives. Of course fdr had no interest in something like that.
What was your original point ...What the hell are you talking about? Where do you see "leftist" or "revisionist"? Or are you just jumping at your own shadow?
By all means ....
Go ahead and parrot your Leftist history revisionist crap.
...
The japanese were not going to negotiate a surrender ...Another option might have been pursuing the opportunity for a negotiated surrender long before all this, which would have saved untold numbers of American lives. Of course fdr had no interest in something like that.
Take your lazy slacker ass to a real course on US History. After you complete your course on basic logic, of course.Just hit the highlights of international events involving the USNo, because history isn't something simple that fits on the back of a cereal box, except for simpletons who are incapable of anything more.