Interesting. One of the periods of major growth in this nation was the 1950's. Using that grqwth as a basis, let's return to the tax structure of that period. Sound good?
Only a complete ignoramus would equate the 1950's with today's world, so I'm not surprised you did.
Detail the difference in what you would consider the effect of more people having more money to pay their bills, the infrastructure seen to, which would also see more people having more money to pay their bills as well as engage in some discretionary spending, which would support the discretionary industries, which would allow them to pay more people who would also be able to pay their bills, and maybe engage in a little discretionary spending of their own (et cetera, add holyshitdidsomebodydroptenbucksatthemoviesthisweek?), between this austerity that the business world has blessud us with in return for bailing their sorry entitled asses out to the tune of our grand children's servitude.
I bet you'd have a hissy fit if the maid forgot to drop off extra bath linens at a fancy hotel. Could be you wouldn't think twice about having some poor working stiff fired to take advantage of service recovery as long as you saved a buck or two.
But all the while you don't demand decent service from the very entity you have the most invested in. ******* typical.