60 Minutes Reportedly Set To Reveal Pelosi Corruption...

[Truthmatters]

can we wait for the proof to be shown on both these people?


Why do you people only precomdem one as guilty?

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

can we wait for the proof to be shown on both these people?


Why do you people only precomdem one as guilty?

So did Boehner do the same thing guys?????

If he did does that justifly Pelosi doing it in your opinion?

If she did it she should be prosecuted, if he did it he should be prosecuted....my opinion what is yours?

?

 

[Truthmatters]

why are you pretending the article did NOT include the actions of boehner?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

can we wait for the proof to be shown on both these people?


Why do you people only precomdem one as guilty?

she said a funny

 

[Truthmatters]

see how morally bankrupt you are?


the article talks of two people who possibly have corruption problems of the very same nature.

Your side ONLY condems one person.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

see how morally bankrupt you are?


the article talks of two people who possibly have corruption problems of the very same nature.

Your side ONLY condems one person.

Do you condem both of them if its all true?

 

[paulitician]

The Liberal Press looking into Democratic corruption is surprising,so i have to give props to 60 Minutes on this one. Pelosi has always been corrupt. I hope her reign of terror comes to an end real soon.

 

[blastoff]

Kroft also reportedly peppered House Speaker John Boehner with questions about trades he made in health-insurance company stock as healthcare reform legislation was moving through Congress. Boehner denied any improprieties in the trades.


from the article.

You only pre condem the other side huh?

Where did I condemn Pelosi? I'm surprised that 60mins would look into anything the hag would do, but I'm not convinced of her guilt anymore than I would be Boehner's, by an article in the snitch.

Sort of the old blind squirrel thing. Or, as Rush puts it, a random act of journalism.

 

[paulitician]

You only pre condem the other side huh?

Where did I condemn Pelosi? I'm surprised that 60mins would look into anything the hag would do, but I'm not convinced of her guilt anymore than I would be Boehner's, by an article in the snitch.

Sort of the old blind squirrel thing. Or, as Rush puts it, a random act of journalism.

Well that is true most often with the Liberal/Democrat-dominated MSM. So i have to agree with that statement. But i'll still give 60 Minutes some props for their attempt at honesty & integrity. Maybe more in the Liberal Press will follow their lead. I'm an optimist so i'll hold out hope.

 

[Truthmatters]

Yea i never trusted Pelosi. Once she labelled protesters "Un-American Nazis",i gave up on her for good. I hope they throw the book at her. She really does deserve it.

you condemed her as guilty all ready

 

[Warrior102]

can we wait for the proof to be shown on both these people?


Why do you people only precomdem one as guilty?

Why don't you STFU and resume bashing Cain, dumbfuck.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

So did Boehner do the same thing guys?????

Isn't Sesame Street on right now?

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

can we wait for the proof to be shown on both these people?


Why do you people only precomdem one as guilty?

This coming from the person who is all over this forum condemning Herman Cain WITHOUT any proof what so ever.. You're ridiculous. I swear I think you're mentally off.

 

[California Girl]

Yea i never trusted Pelosi. Once she labelled protesters "Un-American Nazis",i gave up on her for good. I hope they throw the book at her. She really does deserve it.

you condemed her as guilty all ready

Defend your corrupt treasonous ***** from now until the end of days... she will still be a treasonous ***** and you will still be a ******* deluded partisan hack.

 

[California Girl]

can we wait for the proof to be shown on both these people?


Why do you people only precomdem one as guilty?

This coming from the person who is all over this forum condemning Herman Cain WITHOUT any proof what so ever.. You're ridiculous. I swear I think you're mentally off.

She is somewhat challenged intellectually.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

can we wait for the proof to be shown on both these people?


Why do you people only precomdem one as guilty?

This coming from the person who is all over this forum condemning Herman Cain WITHOUT any proof what so ever.. You're ridiculous. I swear I think you're mentally off.

That is actually a good point.

 

[Inthemiddle]

can we wait for the proof to be shown on both these people?


Why do you people only precomdem one as guilty?

Why don't you STFU and resume bashing Cain, dumbfuck.

And what the Hell did that accomplish?

 

[Truthmatters]

This is not about cain.

Cain has a GOP pollster who is a witness to the sexual harrassment.

An eye witness is acceptable evidence in any ******* court case.

Why do you pretend it is not?

 

[Truthmatters]

can we wait for the proof to be shown on both these people?


Why do you people only precomdem one as guilty?

This coming from the person who is all over this forum condemning Herman Cain WITHOUT any proof what so ever.. You're ridiculous. I swear I think you're mentally off.

She is somewhat challenged intellectually.

Is an eye witness accepted court evidence?

 

[Truthmatters]

can we wait for the proof to be shown on both these people?


Why do you people only precomdem one as guilty?

This coming from the person who is all over this forum condemning Herman Cain WITHOUT any proof what so ever.. You're ridiculous. I swear I think you're mentally off.

Is eye witness testimony accept court evidence?