Instituted a federal hiring freeze that blocked 2,000 vital, new positions at the VA, and indefinitely suspended Army childcare programs for vets.
Not filling vital positions is irresponsible.
Suspending the childcare program for vets is grossly hypocritical on Trump's part. Moreover, who screws over U.S. veterans, especially when they themselves didn't serve? Well, I know one person who does. Trump. Now it may be that others have too, but they aren't POTUS now, plus that someone else may have does not make it right for Trump to do so.
Reinstated and strengthened the global gag rule thereby pulling all world-wide federal funding from any institutions that even attempt to educate patients about abortion.
It makes no sense to me that anyone would strive to deny people comprehensive education/information about a medical procedure and what the law allows/doesn't allow with regard to one's availing themselves of it.
6. Used the office of the presidency to criticize Nordstrom, a private company, for no longer selling his daughter’s clothing line.
29. Used the National Prayer breakfast to throw shade at Arnold Schwarzenegger.
One can't be the POTUS and still publicly criticize an American citizen or criticize an American company for a business decision it made. Moreover, regardless of who did and didn't vote for him, who does or doesn't support him, the fact is that once one becomes POTUS, are everyone's president and that means, among other things, that the POTUS should refrain from publicly berating a person or individual for doing something that didn't break the law. Ragging on the opposing party at a party level is fine, but that's it.
And, yes, that means the POTUS must still support all Americans even though all Americans don't necessarily support the POTUS. That's just part of the deal when one assumes elected/appointed office, be it POTUS, ROTUS, SOTUS, or JOTUS. It's the same at the state and local level as well. Elected representatives simply give up part of what it means to be a private citizen. Again, it's just part of the territory.
7. Didn’t fully divest from his businesses and has transferred many of his companies to his sons opening the door for a litany of potential conflicts of interest.
Didn’t release his tax returns like he promised, and has no plans to do so.
Demonized and repeatedly attacked the free press.
Signed a bill reversing the Stream Protection Rule making it far easier for coal companies to dump mining waste in rivers, lakes and streams.
Agree
11. Announced plans to sign executive orders lifting a coal mining ban on federal land
I don't think anyone should be able to use federal, state or locally held undeveloped lands/waters to generate private profit/revenue. If a government sells the land to a private party, fine. In contrast, I don't mind, for example, that the U.S. Government has leased the Old Post Office to Trump Organization (or some other entity/individual). The building was there; it was going to be used for something. Presumably leasing it to a private entity was the most economically sage use the government could come up with for it. (I do have a problem with the Trump name being on the building while Donnie holds the office of POTUS.)
Signed an executive order, later ruled to be unconstitutional, barring immigrants and travelers from 7 Muslim-majority nations from entering the U.S.
I'm less concerned with the man issuing an exec order (EO) to ban travellers of a certain class than I am over the fact that he/his team didn't "do their homework" well enough to have crafted the EO so that it wouldn't withstand judicial scrutiny. It's implementation was precipitous, slovenly, and procrustean. It'd be different if he hadn't been prattling on about the ban for well over a year, but he had been. There's no excuse for that EO not having been thoroughly thought through and composed. It's not as though it was a long document like the ACA or something, though I don't think I'd have a different POV if it were.
The POTUS is within his authority to issue a ban. I think the ban he's issued is absurd for a variety of reasons -- those
articulated here along with those arrived at by examining the
data found re: the various affected countries on this site -- but the fact remains: he has the authority to issue a travel ban, and the ban must remain in place so long as the judiciary deems it compliant with existing U.S. law and until a subsequent POTUS removes it.
13. Lied about inauguration crowd size.
14. Lied about the size of his electoral college victory.
15. Lied about attacks in Sweden, yet never mentioned attacks in Kansas or Quebec perpetrated by white men on people of color.
16. Lied about being solely responsible for Lockheed Martin cutting $700 million from the F-35 program.
17. Lied about the New York Times failing.
18. Lied about Chris Cuomo never asking Senator Blumenthal about misrepresenting his service in Vietnam.
19. Lied about major news organizations intentionally ignoring terrorist attacks.
20. Lied about the murder rate being the highest its been in 47 years.
21. Lied about Philadelphia’s murder rate increasing.
22. Lied about people being killed at Obama’s farewell address.
23. Lied about ACA covering “very few people.”
24. Lied about the media being less trusted than congress.
27. Berated the Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.
28. Threatened to send U.S. troops into Mexico.
30. Said he would “get rid of and totally destroy” the Johnson amendment, which was designed to keep religion out of politics.
41. Threatened Chicago with martial law.
46. Continued to push evidence-less claims of voter fraud.
Agree
32. Appointed fossil-fuel-shill and climate change-denier Scott Pruitt to head the EPA. He’s sued the EPA 13 times.
31. Appointed Betsy Devos, a billionaire GOP donor with no public school experience to run our public school system.
35. Appointed Rick Perry, a man with who once forgot the Department of Energy existed, flunked organic chemistry and received Cs and Ds in other science courses to run the Department of Energy.
36. Appointed Ben Carson, a man with no government, housing or management experience to run the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Two weeks prior to being nominated, Carson’s business manager Armstrong Williams said “Dr. Carson feels he has no government experience, he’s never run a federal agency. The last thing he would want to do was take a position that could cripple the presidency.”
I don't generally take exception with whomever a POTUS appoints to cabinet level position; however, these are particularly disturbing because each of the appointees has no particular background or experience associated with the department they'll head.
- Pruitt -- On matters environmental, there'll be no intellectual objectivity at the topmost level of the government. It makes no sense that the person in charge of protecting the environment has a long track record of animus toward doing exactly that. Additionally, the man doesn't even, as would a patent attorney, have so much as an undergraduate natural science or engineering degree. Strangely, Betsy Devos has a stronger science background as a mere investor (albeit at the million dollar level) in science and tech companies than does Pruitt. Pruitt's background is purely legal and poli-sci.
- Devos -- This woman's sole experience in education is as an opinionated donor to various education charities and think tanks. I can't even find one scholarly essay the woman has written, let alone one having to do with education/pedagogy.
- Perry -- Got Cs and Ds his science courses says all that need be said. He took his BS in animal science, which at the BS level and in the time he took it, was essentially the life sciences equivalent of "rocks for jocks." (For people in Perry's and my generation, it was what one took when one couldn't perform well in a biology, botany, entomology, chemistry, etc. degree program.)
And what field did the guy enter after leaving the Air Force? Cotton farming. Animal science degree --> Cotton farmer. Yes, that makes sense...Not. Cotton farmers need two skills: minimal business acumen (it's a commodity, after all) and whatever slaves managed to figure out about growing cotton. The guy isn't a complete dolt, but he's also not "smarter than the average bear." I don't have a problem with what he's done with his life or how he made money; I have a problem with his being SecEnergy.
(Neither is Trump, and more than a handful of the very smart people I know have remarked upon how Trump has surrounded himself mostly with people who are not "world class" thinkers. There are some exceptions, but not enough to matter.)
Of the people in Trump's cabinet, who may have made more sense to put at Energy? Well, Rex Tillerson would have been a better choice than Perry. Perry was governor of TX, so it's not as though he or Rex is any more or less "in the pocket" of the energy industry. (You have modified your investment portfolio to include more TX-based energy companies, a larger share in ExxonMobil and the other multinational oil and gas companies (including non-US ones that partner with EM) haven't you? Just because one doesn't like the appointees doesn't mean one shouldn't make money on the fact that they have the offices they do...Those public disclosure documents are there for a reason, after all...)
- Carson -- Dr. Carson is one of the brighter folks in Trump's Administration. Certainly in medicine he is. What's baffling is why he has been effectively "hobbled" by being appointed to head a not-particularly-scientific or medical department. Rather than putting Dr. Carson in a place (HUD) where his lifelong career skills can from day one be brought to bear at "full strength," Trump assigned him to lead a department where he's got to face a learning curve. Even more puzzling is why he accepted/wanted that position.
I don't necessarily agree with a lot of Carson's political stances, but the man's certainly well qualified to be Surgeon General, Director NIH or CDC, SecHHS, and as a scientist, he's certainly more qualified than Pruitt or Perry to run Energy or the EPA. Given his vastly greater experience teaching and going to school than Devos, he's also better suited to Dept. of Education than she. Carson's misrepresentation of his academic achievements give me pause regarding his integrity.
37. Appointed former Goldman Sachs COO Gary Cohn to head the National Economic Council.
38. Appointed former Goldman Sachs partner Steven Mnuchin to head the Treasury Department.
Why should I have a problem with these appointments? There is at least some correlation between these guys and the roles they have assumed.
It's worth nothing that Trump put finance pros in financially related positions. Company finance happens also to be an area where Trump is strong and can maintain his own in policy discussions with the people he's emplaced at the NEC and Dept. of Treasury.
Do you see the pattern? Trump consistently places non-pros in charge of areas where he too is not particularly any more knowledgeable than is an average individual with a college degree.
I'm interested to see how things play out with Tillerson. He's a very smart guy who's brighter in general than is Trump, and he's a much faster study than is Trump. I'm wondering whether he'll assert himself, defer to Trump's whimsicality and capricious recklessness, or resign early (prior to completing four years).
39. Appointed Alt-right hero and former Breitbart Editor Stephen Bannon as chief strategist and later elevated him to the National Security Council.
I don't mind that Bannon has an advisory position, though I don't even remotely agree with his politics. I have a problem with that man being on the NSC.
40. Continued to criticize Hillary Clinton, without ever criticizing Vladimir Putin.
The problem here is definitely not that he criticized, or continued to, Hillary Clinton.
45. Demeaned our court system and questioned a federal judge’s credentials.
Here again...Trump is, if nothing else, not a historian, legal scholar, jurist or attorney. The man has no legal theory training or experience. His only real contact with the law is having been sued and suing a lot of people. For whatever insights that may have given him, constitutional law isn't among them. If he is of a mind to propose we revise our Constitution to dispense with the role of federal courts as part of the system of checks and balances, then he should do so. Otherwise, he should keep his mouth shut about things on which he is far from an expert.
47. Tweeted “I’LL SEE YOU IN COURT” to a court.
Can one utter a more incoherently inane remark?
49. Set his sons out to travel the globe, growing the Trump brand with secret service in tow while taxpayers are footing the bill.
Though I'm not keen on their holding office and running a closely held company, that the nation is paying the bill to protect and transport them in the course of their doing so is not acceptable to me.
50. Nominated Neil Gorsuch, an originalist, for the open supreme court seat.
There's plenty I don't like about this guy, but he's qualified for the job.
52. Tapped vaccine-skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to head a commission on vaccine safety.
I don't understand this appointment at all.
55. Fired acting Attorney General Sally Yates for saying the travel ban was unconstitutional. A few weeks later, the travel ban was ruled unconstitutional in federal court.
Agreed. Trump really needs to stay away, well away, from everything having to do with the law.
58. Embarrassed himself and the country by refusing to shake hands with Angela Merkel.
Agree