50 days grace period? What kind of a sanction is that?

[Man With A Plan]

This is my last reply to you on this subject.

1) Politifact does not give opinion on this. They give facts that can be checked. Every promise kept or broken, is shown in detail. If you can find any that is wrong, show it.
2) This election was not about Biden vs Trump. It was about Harris vs Trump meaning that what Biden did or did not do is not important. Why are you even talking about it? What you are doing is deflecting!
3) Neither Biden nor Trump were good presidents. What we need to talk about is the future, and not the past. Having said that, here is an article that explains it better than I can.

Comparing the U.S. economy under Trump and Biden​

End of story.

Since Harris was asked if she'd anything different than Biden and replied "Nothing comes to mind" that means the election WAS a referendum on Biden's policies.

Are you claiming Biden handled the economy better than Trump? That cited article doesn't back that claim up.

 

[Luckyone]

Since Harris was asked if she'd anything different than Biden and replied "Nothing comes to mind" that means the election WAS a referendum on Biden's policies.

Are you claiming Biden handled the economy better than Trump? That cited article doesn't back that claim up.

I am not saying anything other than Harris is a different person than Biden. No one can say with any degree of accuracy that you know what she would have done if elected.

I mean, look at Trump and all the things he stated that has not done.

 

[Man With A Plan]

I am not saying anything other than Harris is a different person than Biden. No one can say with any degree of accuracy that you know what she would have done if elected.

I mean, look at Trump and all the things he stated that has not done.

Well, when Kamala was asked point blank if there was anything that she'd do differently and said that nothing comes to mind...why would you assume she'd be "different"?

 

[Man With A Plan]

I am not saying anything other than Harris is a different person than Biden. No one can say with any degree of accuracy that you know what she would have done if elected.

I mean, look at Trump and all the things he stated that has not done.

Look at all the things that Trump IS getting done despite having razor thin majorities in Congress and liberal judges employing "lawfare" dozens of times to slow things down!

 

[Billiejeens]

All the Trump Haters are such great arm chair quarterbacks. Lets hear what YOUR solution is to Putin the Psychopath?

Blame everyone else.

 

[Billiejeens]

You did not answer the OP question:

Is a 50-day grace period justified after seeing all the facts stated above?

It's called a negotiation you ******* imbecile.

 

[The Duke]

Blame everyone else.

Strategic targeted strikes.

 

[Billiejeens]

Strategic targeted strikes.

Which Trump haters are for that?

 

[Luckyone]

Look at all the things that Trump IS getting done despite having razor thin majorities in Congress and liberal judges employing "lawfare" dozens of times to slow things down!

He is getting things done at the cost of us losing Democracy

Here, for you information, are the clear guidelines of how a Dictator gets things done in a Democratic nation.

AI Overview

How to achieve goals as a dictator within a democratic framework.

Navigating the complexities of achieving goals within a democratic system as someone with dictatorial tendencies presents a unique set of challenges. It fundamentally clashes with core democratic principles such as rule of law, separation of powers, and citizen participation, notes the United Nations. Dictatorial behavior, by definition, implies a concentration of power and a disregard for these established processes.

However, if one were to consider how to navigate within such a system, the following approaches, though ethically questionable and potentially undermining of democratic institutions, might be observed:

1. Undermining democratic institutions

• Weakening independent oversight: Efforts could be made to weaken or compromise institutions like the judiciary and the legislature that provide checks and balances on executive power. This might involve stacking these institutions with loyalists or denigrating them as obstacles to the public will. Trump is doing that!
• Controlling information: Restricting access to independent news and controlling communication channels can limit public discourse and shape perceptions. Trump is trying to do that!
• Suppressing dissent: Repression of opposition, monitoring political opponents, and restricting freedoms of speech and association are tactics employed by authoritarian regimes to maintain power. Trump is doing that.

2. Exploiting existing mechanisms

• Manipulating elections: Authoritarian regimes may hold elections but ensure they are not competitive for the opposition, using them to legitimize their rule rather than genuinely reflect the popular will. Trump and the Far Right are trying to do that.
• Cultivating loyalty: Building a base of support and loyalty through patronage, propaganda, and fostering a "cult of personality" around the leader can create an illusion of public mandate. Trump is doing that 100%.

3. Gaining popular support (superficially) Trump is doing that.

• Public engagement (controlled): Engaging in public consultations and community events, while carefully controlling the agenda and narrative, might create a façade of participation, according to the Robert Bosch Stiftung. Trump is doing that.
• Addressing concerns strategically: Identifying and addressing public concerns in a way that aligns with the regime's agenda can be used to garner support, notes the Robert Bosch Stiftung. Trump is doing that.

 

[Luckyone]

Well, when Kamala was asked point blank if there was anything that she'd do differently and said that nothing comes to mind...why would you assume she'd be "different"?

Because no two people are ever the same. Common sense.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Because no two people are ever the same. Common sense.

Any yet Kamala couldn't come up with something she'd do differently than Biden? Common sense tells you that you shouldn't vote for someone who had a front row seat to a dumpster fire but doesn't think anything should have been done differently!

 

[Correll]

He is getting things done at the cost of us losing Democracy

Here, for you information, are the clear guidelines of how a Dictator gets things done in a Democratic nation.

AI Overview

How to achieve goals as a dictator within a democratic framework.

Navigating the complexities of achieving goals within a democratic system as someone with dictatorial tendencies presents a unique set of challenges. It fundamentally clashes with core democratic principles such as rule of law, separation of powers, and citizen participation, notes the United Nations. Dictatorial behavior, by definition, implies a concentration of power and a disregard for these established processes.

However, if one were to consider how to navigate within such a system, the following approaches, though ethically questionable and potentially undermining of democratic institutions, might be observed:

1. Undermining democratic institutions

• Weakening independent oversight: Efforts could be made to weaken or compromise institutions like the judiciary and the legislature that provide checks and balances on executive power. This might involve stacking these institutions with loyalists or denigrating them as obstacles to the public will. Trump is doing that!

No, he's not. YOU leftards have corrupted the courts so that instead of providing oversight, they instead provide disloyal oppostion against AMERICA and in favor of Mexicans.

• Controlling information: Restricting access to independent news and controlling communication channels can limit public discourse and shape perceptions. Trump is trying to do that!

Legacy media is disloyal and anti-American opposition. Alternative Media is where the truth is today. Remember how the MSM lied about Biden's health during the election?

• Suppressing dissent: Repression of opposition, monitoring political opponents, and restricting freedoms of speech and association are tactics employed by authoritarian regimes to maintain power. Trump is doing that.

Rioting and attacking federal buildings and agents, is not speech. It is violence and insurrection.

2. Exploiting existing mechanisms

• Manipulating elections: Authoritarian regimes may hold elections but ensure they are not competitive for the opposition, using them to legitimize their rule rather than genuinely reflect the popular will. Trump and the Far Right are trying to do that.

Retarded shit talk by the leftard.

• Cultivating loyalty: Building a base of support and loyalty through patronage, propaganda, and fostering a "cult of personality" around the leader can create an illusion of public mandate. Trump is doing that 100%.

"Propaganda" when the media is like 90% plus negative?

What a load of retarded shit talk.

3. Gaining popular support (superficially) Trump is doing that.

• Public engagement (controlled): Engaging in public consultations and community events, while carefully controlling the agenda and narrative, might create a façade of participation, according to the Robert Bosch Stiftung. Trump is doing that.
• Addressing concerns strategically: Identifying and addressing public concerns in a way that aligns with the regime's agenda can be used to garner support, notes the Robert Bosch Stiftung. Trump is doing that.

This sounds like, both of them, something all effective governments TRY to do. That the ai thinks this is "Authoritarian" is a good example of how AI is still sucking ass.

 

[Woodznutz]

Trump "finally" talked a strong game against Putin, criticizing Putin's continuing attacks on Ukrainian's innocent people and lack of desire to have peace talks. Trump stated:



and he followed that up by stating that he would:

Trump threatens tariffs targeting Russia without deal to end Ukraine war in 50 days​

That all sounds great BUT.....................50 day "grace" period?

To begin with (which we all know), he promised to end the war in 24 hours...............that did not happen. Then on February 12th (4 months ago) he started urging Putin to come to the table to have peace talks.............that did not happen. In the meantime, he has stated that it is Zelensky that is being unreasonable and threatening him to withdraw our support..................Zelensky in return, signed a rare earth deal that would give us natural ore in return for support.......................that did happen.

Then Hegseth made a decision to not send arms to Ukraine and Trump pooh-poohed that decision.

and now, this war has another 50 days to continue without any action on our part?

and here is reality:

The number of civilian casualties (killed and injured) reportedly almost doubled in the second quarter of 2025 compared to the first.

AI Overview
Casualties in the Russia-Ukraine war (past 4 months)

• June 2025: 232 people killed.
• May 2025: 183 civilians killed.
• April 2025: 209 civilians killed.

So now Putin has the ability to kill another 400+ innocent civilians before he is due to face sanctions against him?

Is a 50-day grace period justified after seeing all the facts stated above?

In religious terms it's called a "space to repent", demonstrating God's patience with us. Better yet God allows us our lifetime to "come to Jesus".