5 Voting Machines Found Tampered With

[Flash]

[
Ray you're living in a dream world NOBODY including Dems wants to lose the right to own a gun ,, It's what I call a strawman argument by repubs

Bullshit!

The Democrat Party is full of anti gun nuts. It is an obsession with them.

 

[eddiew37]

[Q

You were never going to lose your gun rights unless you were certifiable You believed what the idiots told you to believe

That stupid bitch you idiotic Moon Bats voted for said that she didn't even think the Second Amendment was an individual right and it should be repealed.

Of course we don't have to worry about that hateful confused bitch any more, do we? She needs to spend all her time left doing everything possible to stay out of jail.

Next time you Moon Bats need to pull your heads out of your ass and not nominate a corrupt dishonest incompetent asshole that had more baggage than Delta Airlines. You may stand a better chance of winning.

Yeah we need a guy who bought and paid for 3 wives ,a rapist accused by 12 women of fondling and pussy grabbing a guy who lies every time he opens his mouth with 75 law suits against him ,, then we might get repub votes

 

[Flash]

[

Yeah we need a guy who bought and paid for 3 wives ,a rapist accused by 12 women of fondling and pussy grabbing a guy who lies every time he opens his mouth with 75 law suits against him ,, then we might get repub votes

I am sorry Moon Bat to tell you this but I didn't vote for Trump so you can take your partisan hate and shove it up your Libtard ass..

However, you are one of the idiots that voted for that corrupt dishonest loser Crooked Hillary.

You Libtards were dumbasses nominating a corrupt and dishonest dingbat and now you have Trump as the President as payback for your stupidity. Enjoy!

 

[eddiew37]

[

Yeah we need a guy who bought and paid for 3 wives ,a rapist accused by 12 women of fondling and pussy grabbing a guy who lies every time he opens his mouth with 75 law suits against him ,, then we might get repub votes

I am sorry Moon Bat to tell you this but I didn't vote for Trump so you can take your partisan hate and shove it up your Libtard ass..

However, you are one of the idiots that voted for that corrupt dishonest loser Crooked Hillary.

You Libtards were dumbasses nominating a corrupt and dishonest dingbat and now you have Trump as the President as payback for your stupidity. Enjoy!

you are a reason we have dump ,, hope you get whatever shit rains down on you because of him

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

According to the article these are machines that are being used in the recount the very same recount that Jill Stein raised money for and Democrats are happily going along with. Just let that sink in a moment.

 

[Flash]

[Q

you are a reason we have dump ,, hope you get whatever shit rains down on you because of him

How can I be the reason? I didn't vote for him and I am not even a Republican.

You are delusional with your hate.

Trump is President because Obama did a lousy job as President and your filthy Moon Bat party nominated a real loser with this Crooked Hillary bitch. You have nobody to blame but yourself.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

The ReTrumplicans are so afraid that there will be proof of vote tampering they will do anything to stop the vote recount. Why?

Could it be they know that Trump might have "rigged" the election.

Accusing others of what you're doing is a great cover!

I thought the idea of the recount was to find if Russia was tampering with the machines.

These machines are not connected to any outside network and only attached to the master to tally individual machines to the whole. Hacking using an external network could not have been done with these machines. Only on site card tampering could be done..

Chances of Russian intrusion are extremely unlikely..

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. They have to be loaded with ballot software that is obtained off of computers that are connected to the internet. Therefor any infected data from that machine can be transferred to these machines when the ballot software is moved to them using a removable data storage device.

why do the computers have to be connected to the internet? You do understand that it would be possible to actually write the software, load the disks then ship the disks right? the internet would never have to be in play.

 

[Lewdog]

The ReTrumplicans are so afraid that there will be proof of vote tampering they will do anything to stop the vote recount. Why?

Could it be they know that Trump might have "rigged" the election.

Accusing others of what you're doing is a great cover!

I thought the idea of the recount was to find if Russia was tampering with the machines.

These machines are not connected to any outside network and only attached to the master to tally individual machines to the whole. Hacking using an external network could not have been done with these machines. Only on site card tampering could be done..

Chances of Russian intrusion are extremely unlikely..

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. They have to be loaded with ballot software that is obtained off of computers that are connected to the internet. Therefor any infected data from that machine can be transferred to these machines when the ballot software is moved to them using a removable data storage device.

why do the computers have to be connected to the internet? You do understand that it would be possible to actually write the software, load the disks then ship the disks right? the internet would never have to be in play.

Because that's not how it works. The professor who did they study about this studied the actual way things are done, and he said the ballots are made on computers in the voting offices on computers hooked to the internet.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

The ReTrumplicans are so afraid that there will be proof of vote tampering they will do anything to stop the vote recount. Why?

Could it be they know that Trump might have "rigged" the election.

Accusing others of what you're doing is a great cover!

I thought the idea of the recount was to find if Russia was tampering with the machines.

These machines are not connected to any outside network and only attached to the master to tally individual machines to the whole. Hacking using an external network could not have been done with these machines. Only on site card tampering could be done..

Chances of Russian intrusion are extremely unlikely..

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. They have to be loaded with ballot software that is obtained off of computers that are connected to the internet. Therefor any infected data from that machine can be transferred to these machines when the ballot software is moved to them using a removable data storage device.

why do the computers have to be connected to the internet? You do understand that it would be possible to actually write the software, load the disks then ship the disks right? the internet would never have to be in play.

Because that's not how it works. The professor who did they study about this studied the actual way things are done, and he said the ballots are made on computers in the voting offices on computers hooked to the internet.

well, if he cant prove without any doubt that there was tampering involved, there was no tampering involved.
Just like voter ID, without it we cant prove that illegals vote, therefore because we dont have it, no illegals ever voted. This is all pretty standard democrat reasoning.
there was no fraud. and there is no reason to think there ever could be.

 

[Lewdog]

I thought the idea of the recount was to find if Russia was tampering with the machines.

These machines are not connected to any outside network and only attached to the master to tally individual machines to the whole. Hacking using an external network could not have been done with these machines. Only on site card tampering could be done..

Chances of Russian intrusion are extremely unlikely..

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. They have to be loaded with ballot software that is obtained off of computers that are connected to the internet. Therefor any infected data from that machine can be transferred to these machines when the ballot software is moved to them using a removable data storage device.

why do the computers have to be connected to the internet? You do understand that it would be possible to actually write the software, load the disks then ship the disks right? the internet would never have to be in play.

Because that's not how it works. The professor who did they study about this studied the actual way things are done, and he said the ballots are made on computers in the voting offices on computers hooked to the internet.

well, if he cant prove without any doubt that there was tampering involved, there was no tampering involved.
Just like voter ID, without it we cant prove that illegals vote, therefore because we dont have it, no illegals ever voted. This is all pretty standard democrat reasoning.
there was no fraud. and there is no reason to think there ever could be.

I'm saying Mars dirt taste like cherries. No one has ever tasted Mars dirt, so obviously it taste like cherries.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The ReTrumplicans are so afraid that there will be proof of vote tampering they will do anything to stop the vote recount. Why?

Could it be they know that Trump might have "rigged" the election.

Accusing others of what you're doing is a great cover!

I thought the idea of the recount was to find if Russia was tampering with the machines.

These machines are not connected to any outside network and only attached to the master to tally individual machines to the whole. Hacking using an external network could not have been done with these machines. Only on site card tampering could be done..

Chances of Russian intrusion are extremely unlikely..

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. They have to be loaded with ballot software that is obtained off of computers that are connected to the internet. Therefor any infected data from that machine can be transferred to these machines when the ballot software is moved to them using a removable data storage device.

why do the computers have to be connected to the internet? You do understand that it would be possible to actually write the software, load the disks then ship the disks right? the internet would never have to be in play.

Because that's not how it works. The professor who did they study about this studied the actual way things are done, and he said the ballots are made on computers in the voting offices on computers hooked to the internet.

He also assumed that there were no preventative measures in place to stop any hacking on those computers.

Do you really believe for one minute that counties, who maintain these computers, didn't have any kind of anti-virus malware protection? It's not like they constructed these ballots on the local library computers.

 

[Lewdog]

I thought the idea of the recount was to find if Russia was tampering with the machines.

These machines are not connected to any outside network and only attached to the master to tally individual machines to the whole. Hacking using an external network could not have been done with these machines. Only on site card tampering could be done..

Chances of Russian intrusion are extremely unlikely..

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. They have to be loaded with ballot software that is obtained off of computers that are connected to the internet. Therefor any infected data from that machine can be transferred to these machines when the ballot software is moved to them using a removable data storage device.

why do the computers have to be connected to the internet? You do understand that it would be possible to actually write the software, load the disks then ship the disks right? the internet would never have to be in play.

Because that's not how it works. The professor who did they study about this studied the actual way things are done, and he said the ballots are made on computers in the voting offices on computers hooked to the internet.

He also assumed that there were no preventative measures in place to stop any hacking on those computers.

Do you really believe for one minute that counties, who maintain these computers, didn't have any kind of anti-virus malware protection? It's not like they constructed these ballots on the local library computers.

....multiple voting offices WERE hacked... and several others had hacking attempts on them

 

[Maryland Patriot]

These machines are not connected to any outside network and only attached to the master to tally individual machines to the whole. Hacking using an external network could not have been done with these machines. Only on site card tampering could be done..

Chances of Russian intrusion are extremely unlikely..

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. They have to be loaded with ballot software that is obtained off of computers that are connected to the internet. Therefor any infected data from that machine can be transferred to these machines when the ballot software is moved to them using a removable data storage device.

why do the computers have to be connected to the internet? You do understand that it would be possible to actually write the software, load the disks then ship the disks right? the internet would never have to be in play.

Because that's not how it works. The professor who did they study about this studied the actual way things are done, and he said the ballots are made on computers in the voting offices on computers hooked to the internet.

He also assumed that there were no preventative measures in place to stop any hacking on those computers.

Do you really believe for one minute that counties, who maintain these computers, didn't have any kind of anti-virus malware protection? It's not like they constructed these ballots on the local library computers.

....multiple voting offices WERE hacked... and several others had hacking attempts on them

well, thats amazing.
Trump won.
even with the illegals voting by the millions.

 

[jon_berzerk]

LOL We're coming to take your guns away And you dorks believed that repub bs

We believed it enough to elect a President that will nominate Supreme Court justices to protect our gun rights, and you're laughing?

You were never going to lose your gun rights unless you were certifiable You believed what the idiots told you to believe

No, completely wrong. With a Commie majority in the Supreme Court, they could have ruled that we citizens do not have a constitutional rights to own or carry guns. That would have given cities and states a free ride to create any kind of gun restrictive laws they wanted, including a total outlaw of firearms. Without that constitutional protection, they could have taxed firearms, ammunition, force us to buy liability insurance, any number of things, many of which were either tried or suggested by Democrats in the past.

Ray you're living in a dream world NOBODY including Dems wants to lose the right to own a gun ,, It's what I call a strawman argument by repubs

The Democrat party is the anti-firearm party. Why would you support a party that does want the elimination of guns if you say you don't support it? It's far from a straw man. If you would like, I can go to my gun folder and dig up stories of what Democrats tried and wanted to do in the past about guns.

or have already done about guns

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

These machines are not connected to any outside network and only attached to the master to tally individual machines to the whole. Hacking using an external network could not have been done with these machines. Only on site card tampering could be done..

Chances of Russian intrusion are extremely unlikely..

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. They have to be loaded with ballot software that is obtained off of computers that are connected to the internet. Therefor any infected data from that machine can be transferred to these machines when the ballot software is moved to them using a removable data storage device.

why do the computers have to be connected to the internet? You do understand that it would be possible to actually write the software, load the disks then ship the disks right? the internet would never have to be in play.

Because that's not how it works. The professor who did they study about this studied the actual way things are done, and he said the ballots are made on computers in the voting offices on computers hooked to the internet.

He also assumed that there were no preventative measures in place to stop any hacking on those computers.

Do you really believe for one minute that counties, who maintain these computers, didn't have any kind of anti-virus malware protection? It's not like they constructed these ballots on the local library computers.

....multiple voting offices WERE hacked... and several others had hacking attempts on them

Perhaps, but no evidence whatsoever that the actual voting machines were hacked. What they tried to do is hack the voting rolls, but that would be very obvious eventually. And it furthers my point that there are safeguards in place for such an attack.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

These machines are not connected to any outside network and only attached to the master to tally individual machines to the whole. Hacking using an external network could not have been done with these machines. Only on site card tampering could be done..

Chances of Russian intrusion are extremely unlikely..

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. They have to be loaded with ballot software that is obtained off of computers that are connected to the internet. Therefor any infected data from that machine can be transferred to these machines when the ballot software is moved to them using a removable data storage device.

why do the computers have to be connected to the internet? You do understand that it would be possible to actually write the software, load the disks then ship the disks right? the internet would never have to be in play.

Because that's not how it works. The professor who did they study about this studied the actual way things are done, and he said the ballots are made on computers in the voting offices on computers hooked to the internet.

He also assumed that there were no preventative measures in place to stop any hacking on those computers.

Do you really believe for one minute that counties, who maintain these computers, didn't have any kind of anti-virus malware protection? It's not like they constructed these ballots on the local library computers.

....multiple voting offices WERE hacked... and several others had hacking attempts on them

But of COURSE Hillary's home server could NOT be hacked right?

 

[Lewdog]

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. They have to be loaded with ballot software that is obtained off of computers that are connected to the internet. Therefor any infected data from that machine can be transferred to these machines when the ballot software is moved to them using a removable data storage device.

why do the computers have to be connected to the internet? You do understand that it would be possible to actually write the software, load the disks then ship the disks right? the internet would never have to be in play.

Because that's not how it works. The professor who did they study about this studied the actual way things are done, and he said the ballots are made on computers in the voting offices on computers hooked to the internet.

He also assumed that there were no preventative measures in place to stop any hacking on those computers.

Do you really believe for one minute that counties, who maintain these computers, didn't have any kind of anti-virus malware protection? It's not like they constructed these ballots on the local library computers.

....multiple voting offices WERE hacked... and several others had hacking attempts on them

But of COURSE Hillary's home server could NOT be hacked right?

I didn't say that. In fact I think it probably was.

 

[Papageorgio]

It is being reported on far left wing nut sites. I'll wait until it is confirmed by real news sources.

 

[TheDude]

Photographic proof of Trumpkin rigging!

Democrat controlled precincts..... makes your accusation highly unlikely and more likely democrat tampering..

That was my first thought anyway. Somehow what's left of the left forget it's the Demoncirats that proved to be in decay.

 

[ninja007]

w/o the tampered machines she would have lost worse.