5 Days After Biden Inauguration, Judge Rules Changes To VA Election Law That Allowed Late Mail-in-Ballots Without Postmark To Be Counted Is Illegal

[Roudy]

Democrats cannot win elections without cheating. That's been going on for decades now. For a republican to win, they have to have to overcome all the fraudulent and fake votes the Democrats throw at them. It happened it 2016, but that was going to be impossible n 2020 with the millions of unsolicited mail in ballots in corrupt Democrat run cities and states with histories of fraud and rigging.

Trump and his advisors are partly to blame as well. Was there any doubt what the Democrats were up to, with Biden hiding in his basement and no campaigning for eight months? He / the Republican Party should have taken the preventative measures, as Democrats are very good at fraud and treason and hiding their tracks. But as we know there was a contingent of deep state republicans in the states in question, that wanted Trump out as well.

 

[Lastamender]

Five Days After Biden Inauguration, Judge Rules Late Changes To VA Election Law That Allowed Late Mail-in-Ballots Without Postmark To Be Counted Is ILLEGAL​

Five Days After Biden Inauguration, Judge Rules Late Changes To VA Election Law That Allowed Late Mail-in-Ballots Without Postmark To Be Counted Is ILLEGAL (thegatewaypundit.com)
29 Jan 2021 ~~ By Patty MacMurray
100 Percent Fed Up – Joe Biden’s bizarre inauguration spurred the same amount of enthusiasm most Americans have for purchasing a 3-ring binder from CVS. Yet, somehow, we’re supposed to believe he got more votes than any president in United States history?
One of the most common arguments made by Democrats, RINOs, and their allies in the media, to disprove voter fraud in the November election is that every single voter fraud case that’s been tried in the courts has failed. Americans need to keep their eyes on upcoming court cases related to election fraud. SCOTUS Blog lists an astounding 21 election fraud-related cases they’re watching.
One case that’s not making news in the Democrat Party’s mainstream media is a decision made by a Virginia judge on Monday. The judge ruled that last-minute changes made by election officials to allow absentee ballots with missing or illegible postmarks to be counted is illegal.


Comment:
No sane, knowledgeable and honest American believes Dementia Joe received more LEGITIMATE votes than President Trump.
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Leftists robbed the election equivalent of Fort Knox and got away with it, not because there wasn't proof, but because Americans are lazy and apathetic.
People won't even quit Facebook and Twitter in meaningful numbers after what they're doing. It's too much of an inconvenience.
America deserves this. We've gotten fat and soft and the bullies are taking our lunch money. It's as simple as that.
No one fears the "American people" anymore, especially those that have been elected using fraud.
The PM/DSA Leftists weren't prepared for Trump's overwhelming number of votes!!! They started pulling their fraudulent votes out of the woodwork as sen in Georgia, Michigan and Pennsylvania...thus the reason for ballots with only Joe checked!!! They did not down voting, just Biden!!
Nothing about this election matters or counts or makes any difference now, this is not a win for the rule of law or the American people, we have one of the most corrupt judicial systems they're on par with any other 3rd world country. If Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats Commies pass this new voting bill (HR-1) there'll never be another president elected by the people in this country. Trump was the first in decades, all communist democrats and RINOs have been placed into office for decades and all have inched us closer and closer to the NWO until Trump was elected, he actually moved us away from the new world order a few steps. This is why these Marxist, SocialisE politicians are undoing everything he did via Executive Orders. To top insult to injury it's being done through an dementia addled puppet that doesn't even know what planet he's on.

So what? Why should anyone care? Virginia wasn't close anyway. Give it up, cultist.

You are the cultist.

You are just pathetic. The vote wasnt affected.

There was massive fraud. Period.

And yet you have no evidence. So the world laughs at you.

All kinds of evidence. The world is laughing at you and the others giving up their freedoms and believing one lie after the other.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

We need a new election...I mean if we want to get it right...do we want to get it right or not?....

Asking dead people to do it again is quite a lot doncha think?

 

[Turtlesoup]

Five Days After Biden Inauguration, Judge Rules Late Changes To VA Election Law That Allowed Late Mail-in-Ballots Without Postmark To Be Counted Is ILLEGAL​

Five Days After Biden Inauguration, Judge Rules Late Changes To VA Election Law That Allowed Late Mail-in-Ballots Without Postmark To Be Counted Is ILLEGAL (thegatewaypundit.com)
29 Jan 2021 ~~ By Patty MacMurray
100 Percent Fed Up – Joe Biden’s bizarre inauguration spurred the same amount of enthusiasm most Americans have for purchasing a 3-ring binder from CVS. Yet, somehow, we’re supposed to believe he got more votes than any president in United States history?
One of the most common arguments made by Democrats, RINOs, and their allies in the media, to disprove voter fraud in the November election is that every single voter fraud case that’s been tried in the courts has failed. Americans need to keep their eyes on upcoming court cases related to election fraud. SCOTUS Blog lists an astounding 21 election fraud-related cases they’re watching.
One case that’s not making news in the Democrat Party’s mainstream media is a decision made by a Virginia judge on Monday. The judge ruled that last-minute changes made by election officials to allow absentee ballots with missing or illegible postmarks to be counted is illegal.


Comment:
No sane, knowledgeable and honest American believes Dementia Joe received more LEGITIMATE votes than President Trump.
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Leftists robbed the election equivalent of Fort Knox and got away with it, not because there wasn't proof, but because Americans are lazy and apathetic.
People won't even quit Facebook and Twitter in meaningful numbers after what they're doing. It's too much of an inconvenience.
America deserves this. We've gotten fat and soft and the bullies are taking our lunch money. It's as simple as that.
No one fears the "American people" anymore, especially those that have been elected using fraud.
The PM/DSA Leftists weren't prepared for Trump's overwhelming number of votes!!! They started pulling their fraudulent votes out of the woodwork as sen in Georgia, Michigan and Pennsylvania...thus the reason for ballots with only Joe checked!!! They did not down voting, just Biden!!
Nothing about this election matters or counts or makes any difference now, this is not a win for the rule of law or the American people, we have one of the most corrupt judicial systems they're on par with any other 3rd world country. If Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats Commies pass this new voting bill (HR-1) there'll never be another president elected by the people in this country. Trump was the first in decades, all communist democrats and RINOs have been placed into office for decades and all have inched us closer and closer to the NWO until Trump was elected, he actually moved us away from the new world order a few steps. This is why these Marxist, SocialisE politicians are undoing everything he did via Executive Orders. To top insult to injury it's being done through an dementia addled puppet that doesn't even know what planet he's on.

So what? Why should anyone care? Virginia wasn't close anyway. Give it up, cultist.

Why would anyone care about illegal votes? Really?

 

[busybee01]

And yet nobody has been able to prove it.
There has been massive evidence of small numbers of irregular votes. But that doesn't add up to massive voter fraud.
Even 1,000 instances of 1,000 suspect votes, doesn't come close to changing the 8 million vote lead needed to overturn the election.

Vote totals don't win presidential elections. States and electoral votes do. You are arguing
from a position of ignorance. Try Hereistheevidence.com.
The fraud in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Arizona gave Corrupt Joe Biden the election.
And in all cases the fraud was facilitated by just a very few people, governors, Secretaries of State, some
judges, etc. illegally changing voter laws prior to the election. Or during and after the election.

NEW PA Ballot Data | Here Is The Evidence

hereistheevidence.com

There was no fraud. You are the ones who are corrupt. No voter laws were changed.

 

[surada]

Five Days After Biden Inauguration, Judge Rules Late Changes To VA Election Law That Allowed Late Mail-in-Ballots Without Postmark To Be Counted Is ILLEGAL​

Five Days After Biden Inauguration, Judge Rules Late Changes To VA Election Law That Allowed Late Mail-in-Ballots Without Postmark To Be Counted Is ILLEGAL (thegatewaypundit.com)
29 Jan 2021 ~~ By Patty MacMurray
100 Percent Fed Up – Joe Biden’s bizarre inauguration spurred the same amount of enthusiasm most Americans have for purchasing a 3-ring binder from CVS. Yet, somehow, we’re supposed to believe he got more votes than any president in United States history?
One of the most common arguments made by Democrats, RINOs, and their allies in the media, to disprove voter fraud in the November election is that every single voter fraud case that’s been tried in the courts has failed. Americans need to keep their eyes on upcoming court cases related to election fraud. SCOTUS Blog lists an astounding 21 election fraud-related cases they’re watching.
One case that’s not making news in the Democrat Party’s mainstream media is a decision made by a Virginia judge on Monday. The judge ruled that last-minute changes made by election officials to allow absentee ballots with missing or illegible postmarks to be counted is illegal.


Comment:
No sane, knowledgeable and honest American believes Dementia Joe received more LEGITIMATE votes than President Trump.
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Leftists robbed the election equivalent of Fort Knox and got away with it, not because there wasn't proof, but because Americans are lazy and apathetic.
People won't even quit Facebook and Twitter in meaningful numbers after what they're doing. It's too much of an inconvenience.
America deserves this. We've gotten fat and soft and the bullies are taking our lunch money. It's as simple as that.
No one fears the "American people" anymore, especially those that have been elected using fraud.
The PM/DSA Leftists weren't prepared for Trump's overwhelming number of votes!!! They started pulling their fraudulent votes out of the woodwork as sen in Georgia, Michigan and Pennsylvania...thus the reason for ballots with only Joe checked!!! They did not down voting, just Biden!!
Nothing about this election matters or counts or makes any difference now, this is not a win for the rule of law or the American people, we have one of the most corrupt judicial systems they're on par with any other 3rd world country. If Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats Commies pass this new voting bill (HR-1) there'll never be another president elected by the people in this country. Trump was the first in decades, all communist democrats and RINOs have been placed into office for decades and all have inched us closer and closer to the NWO until Trump was elected, he actually moved us away from the new world order a few steps. This is why these Marxist, SocialisE politicians are undoing everything he did via Executive Orders. To top insult to injury it's being done through an dementia addled puppet that doesn't even know what planet he's on.

Gateway Pundit has always been ridiculous.

 

[busybee01]

That's the other half of the 2020 election clown show. Weeks before the election, state level election laws in multiple swing states were changed to facilitate cheating. Never happened before in a Presidential election to this extent.

Pennsylvania governor changed a law about verifying signatures.
Legislation can change that law, but the governor cannot.

The Pa, governor, AG and Supreme Court are all corrupt assholes. You can't be fair when you fight anyone that corrupt because they have no intention of being fair.

Trump and supporters like you are the corrupt bastards. If you can't win fairly you will steal it.

 

[busybee01]

Democrats cannot win elections without cheating. That's been going on for decades now. For a republican to win, they have to have to overcome all the fraudulent and fake votes the Democrats throw at them. It happened it 2016, but that was going to be impossible n 2020 with the millions of unsolicited mail in ballots in corrupt Democrat run cities and states with histories of fraud and rigging.

Trump and his advisors are partly to blame as well. Was there any doubt what the Democrats were up to, with Biden hiding in his basement and no campaigning for eight months? He / the Republican Party should have taken the preventative measures, as Democrats are very good at fraud and treason and hiding their tracks. But as we know there was a contingent of deep state republicans in the states in question, that wanted Trump out as well.

Biden won the election and there was no cheating. Again no entity including law enforcement has found any evidence of fraud. You live in a fantasy land. There were no deep state Republicans. Just Republicans who refused to help Trump steal the election.

 

[Roudy]

Democrats cannot win elections without cheating. That's been going on for decades now. For a republican to win, they have to have to overcome all the fraudulent and fake votes the Democrats throw at them. It happened it 2016, but that was going to be impossible n 2020 with the millions of unsolicited mail in ballots in corrupt Democrat run cities and states with histories of fraud and rigging.

Trump and his advisors are partly to blame as well. Was there any doubt what the Democrats were up to, with Biden hiding in his basement and no campaigning for eight months? He / the Republican Party should have taken the preventative measures, as Democrats are very good at fraud and treason and hiding their tracks. But as we know there was a contingent of deep state republicans in the states in question, that wanted Trump out as well.

Biden won the election and there was no cheating. Again no entity including law enforcement has found any evidence of fraud. You live in a fantasy land. There were no deep state Republicans. Just Republicans who refused to help Trump steal the election.

Meh, Democrats always cheat, only this time they used to pandemic to cheat massively. Since they are professional election thieves, they knew how to cover their tracks. For the no moral compass Democrats it doesn't matter how you win.

 

[MarathonMike]

Biden won the election and there was no cheating. Again no entity including law enforcement has found any evidence of fraud. You live in a fantasy land. There were no deep state Republicans. Just Republicans who refused to help Trump steal the election.

Full denial is always the defense of the Democrats. There is a truck load of evidence for any and all kinds of election malfeasance. State level courts overstepped the authority of the state legislatures in changing election laws and then, color me shocked, they didn't want to hear the evidence in court.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

There was no fraud. You are the ones who are corrupt. No voter laws were changed.

Hereistheevidence.com. I won't waste words on the mentally unstable.

 

[emilynghiem]

The state keeps records and have some have shown not very good ones. There was massive fraud.

The fraud would have to be massive. Otherwise exposing it wouldn't effect the outcome. See how that works?

Dear Hidden
At this point the "mass fraud" is Misrepresenting to the public and to voters
that it was permissible to change rules involving "unnotarized mail-in ballots" by other means besides vote through State Legislatures.

The people and leaders seeking to correct this misperception and misrepresentation
are both enforcing Constitutional laws specifying that States make election laws by their State Legislatures, and upholding the Code of Ethics for Govt Service by which any person in govt service should uphold the legal regulations of the United States, "never be a party to their evasion", and "expose corruption wherever discovered". www.ethics-commission.net

Now that both sides accuse the other of deliberately inciting violations of federal laws, this process has become both a hunt to target any possible person accused of guilt by association or by party affiliation, or a process of elimination to discredit anyone accused of violating laws until the only people with credibility left to complain will remain to make these arguments without getting shutdown and censored or bullied as a hypocrite.

I hope the law abiding leaders on both sides of these election related disputes come forward and speak out to ensure laws are enforced, wrongs are corrected, and due process is protected for all persons until these grievances are resolved.

The "mass fraud" is by parties falsely and fraudulently misrepresenting the unconstitutional rule changes as legal.

Now that Congress certified the results legally, we are back where we were with ACA also passed as "Constitutional" by going through the legal motions, while flaws in the process show it was not Constitutional. So we have another "hybrid" situation where people who believe the election and results were Constitutional and those who do not are left in a contradictory situation. Both sides have rights to their faith based beliefs that each can justify for themselves. But neither side has rights to punish the other for their political beliefs by depriving them of representation and freedom to express and exercise their beliefs. Some people DO believe in the Constitution and have rights to correct flaws that otherwise make the election undeterminable. Others DO NOT believe it was unlawful to take shortcuts "due to Covid pandemic conditions" and allow other State Officials to change ballot rules without voting through State Legislatures formally. Both sides deserve representation regardless of their beliefs on what was "good enough" to represent them. This is based on personal beliefs and standards which are rights belonging to people, not courts or federal govt, which is why we likely need a Convention of States and Parties to settle these disputes by offering equal representation to both sides, most likely organized by party to represent the voters by their common beliefs in groups and by regions.

It is up to free choice for people to decide whether or not to respect each other's beliefs.

Some believe the election was Constitutional while others do not and can explain where it violated national laws.

Not even God can force anyone to change their beliefs. Certainly Govt cannot be abused to regulate, mandate or punish people to coerce them into compliance or violation based on their beliefs.

We are heading to a Convention and solution to address these issues where people of all parties can work out better means of equally inclusive representation.

This election isn't the only example of disagreement over the rules. By holding conventions with diverse parties we can solve a lot more problems with partisan interference that have distorted the democratic process to create biased policies discriminating against dissenting citizens left out of the process. A lot more needs to be addressed and corrected, so the entire public will benefit instead of oppressing censoring or punishing people with objections and grievances.

 

[Dekster]

Donald lost VA by 10 points so I doubt it would have made a difference.

 

[toobfreak]

No voter laws were changed.

That's a JOKE, right?

Here's how states have changed the rules around voting amid the coronavirus pandemic

Voting is always confusing, but the coronavirus pandemic has made it even more so -- here's what you need to know about how voting has changed for the general election.

abcnews.go.com

Mail Voting: What Has Changed in 2020

In response to Covid-19, most states have made it easier to vote by mail this year but gaps remain.

www.brennancenter.org

 

[badbob85037]

Five Days After Biden Inauguration, Judge Rules Late Changes To VA Election Law That Allowed Late Mail-in-Ballots Without Postmark To Be Counted Is ILLEGAL​

Five Days After Biden Inauguration, Judge Rules Late Changes To VA Election Law That Allowed Late Mail-in-Ballots Without Postmark To Be Counted Is ILLEGAL (thegatewaypundit.com)
29 Jan 2021 ~~ By Patty MacMurray
100 Percent Fed Up – Joe Biden’s bizarre inauguration spurred the same amount of enthusiasm most Americans have for purchasing a 3-ring binder from CVS. Yet, somehow, we’re supposed to believe he got more votes than any president in United States history?
One of the most common arguments made by Democrats, RINOs, and their allies in the media, to disprove voter fraud in the November election is that every single voter fraud case that’s been tried in the courts has failed. Americans need to keep their eyes on upcoming court cases related to election fraud. SCOTUS Blog lists an astounding 21 election fraud-related cases they’re watching.
One case that’s not making news in the Democrat Party’s mainstream media is a decision made by a Virginia judge on Monday. The judge ruled that last-minute changes made by election officials to allow absentee ballots with missing or illegible postmarks to be counted is illegal.


Comment:
No sane, knowledgeable and honest American believes Dementia Joe received more LEGITIMATE votes than President Trump.
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Leftists robbed the election equivalent of Fort Knox and got away with it, not because there wasn't proof, but because Americans are lazy and apathetic.
People won't even quit Facebook and Twitter in meaningful numbers after what they're doing. It's too much of an inconvenience.
America deserves this. We've gotten fat and soft and the bullies are taking our lunch money. It's as simple as that.
No one fears the "American people" anymore, especially those that have been elected using fraud.
The PM/DSA Leftists weren't prepared for Trump's overwhelming number of votes!!! They started pulling their fraudulent votes out of the woodwork as sen in Georgia, Michigan and Pennsylvania...thus the reason for ballots with only Joe checked!!! They did not down voting, just Biden!!
Nothing about this election matters or counts or makes any difference now, this is not a win for the rule of law or the American people, we have one of the most corrupt judicial systems they're on par with any other 3rd world country. If Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats Commies pass this new voting bill (HR-1) there'll never be another president elected by the people in this country. Trump was the first in decades, all communist democrats and RINOs have been placed into office for decades and all have inched us closer and closer to the NWO until Trump was elected, he actually moved us away from the new world order a few steps. This is why these Marxist, SocialisE politicians are undoing everything he did via Executive Orders. To top insult to injury it's being done through an dementia addled puppet that doesn't even know what planet he's on.

It shows just how pathetic we Americans have become. when we allow a brain dead crazy not only become president but tell us how he will destroy the nation and take our freedom.. I could pound myself in the head till gray matter covered the walls and still never understand how one could cast a vote for this deranged old fool . Some will not go easily and some will fight back in ways he hasn't a clue. Ya hear that little felon beto, tyrant want-2- bee punk?

 

[Doc7505]

The state keeps records and have some have shown not very good ones. There was massive fraud.

The fraud would have to be massive. Otherwise exposing it wouldn't effect the outcome. See how that works?

Dear Hidden
At this point the "mass fraud" is Misrepresenting to the public and to voters
that it was permissible to change rules involving "unnotarized mail-in ballots" by other means besides vote through State Legislatures.

The people and leaders seeking to correct this misperception and misrepresentation
are both enforcing Constitutional laws specifying that States make election laws by their State Legislatures, and upholding the Code of Ethics for Govt Service by which any person in govt service should uphold the legal regulations of the United States, "never be a party to their evasion", and "expose corruption wherever discovered". www.ethics-commission.net

Now that both sides accuse the other of deliberately inciting violations of federal laws, this process has become both a hunt to target any possible person accused of guilt by association or by party affiliation, or a process of elimination to discredit anyone accused of violating laws until the only people with credibility left to complain will remain to make these arguments without getting shutdown and censored or bullied as a hypocrite.

I hope the law abiding leaders on both sides of these election related disputes come forward and speak out to ensure laws are enforced, wrongs are corrected, and due process is protected for all persons until these grievances are resolved.

The "mass fraud" is by parties falsely and fraudulently misrepresenting the unconstitutional rule changes as legal.

Now that Congress certified the results legally, we are back where we were with ACA also passed as "Constitutional" by going through the legal motions, while flaws in the process show it was not Constitutional. So we have another "hybrid" situation where people who believe the election and results were Constitutional and those who do not are left in a contradictory situation. Both sides have rights to their faith based beliefs that each can justify for themselves. But neither side has rights to punish the other for their political beliefs by depriving them of representation and freedom to express and exercise their beliefs. Some people DO believe in the Constitution and have rights to correct flaws that otherwise make the election undeterminable. Others DO NOT believe it was unlawful to take shortcuts "due to Covid pandemic conditions" and allow other State Officials to change ballot rules without voting through State Legislatures formally. Both sides deserve representation regardless of their beliefs on what was "good enough" to represent them. This is based on personal beliefs and standards which are rights belonging to people, not courts or federal govt, which is why we likely need a Convention of States and Parties to settle these disputes by offering equal representation to both sides, most likely organized by party to represent the voters by their common beliefs in groups and by regions.

It is up to free choice for people to decide whether or not to respect each other's beliefs.

Some believe the election was Constitutional while others do not and can explain where it violated national laws.

Not even God can force anyone to change their beliefs. Certainly Govt cannot be abused to regulate, mandate or punish people to coerce them into compliance or violation based on their beliefs.

We are heading to a Convention and solution to address these issues where people of all parties can work out better means of equally inclusive representation.

This election isn't the only example of disagreement over the rules. By holding conventions with diverse parties we can solve a lot more problems with partisan interference that have distorted the democratic process to create biased policies discriminating against dissenting citizens left out of the process. A lot more needs to be addressed and corrected, so the entire public will benefit instead of oppressing censoring or punishing people with objections and grievances.

Democrats will not accede to convene the Convention of States while there is a majority of Republican Governors and an balance of Senators 50/50....
Any changes to the Constitution requires a two thirds vote.

Amending the U.S. Constitution

To date, Congress has submitted 33 amendments to the Constitution, 27 of which were ratified by the states.

www.ncsl.org

 

[emilynghiem]

The state keeps records and have some have shown not very good ones. There was massive fraud.

The fraud would have to be massive. Otherwise exposing it wouldn't effect the outcome. See how that works?

Dear Hidden
At this point the "mass fraud" is Misrepresenting to the public and to voters
that it was permissible to change rules involving "unnotarized mail-in ballots" by other means besides vote through State Legislatures.

The people and leaders seeking to correct this misperception and misrepresentation
are both enforcing Constitutional laws specifying that States make election laws by their State Legislatures, and upholding the Code of Ethics for Govt Service by which any person in govt service should uphold the legal regulations of the United States, "never be a party to their evasion", and "expose corruption wherever discovered". www.ethics-commission.net

Now that both sides accuse the other of deliberately inciting violations of federal laws, this process has become both a hunt to target any possible person accused of guilt by association or by party affiliation, or a process of elimination to discredit anyone accused of violating laws until the only people with credibility left to complain will remain to make these arguments without getting shutdown and censored or bullied as a hypocrite.

I hope the law abiding leaders on both sides of these election related disputes come forward and speak out to ensure laws are enforced, wrongs are corrected, and due process is protected for all persons until these grievances are resolved.

The "mass fraud" is by parties falsely and fraudulently misrepresenting the unconstitutional rule changes as legal.

Now that Congress certified the results legally, we are back where we were with ACA also passed as "Constitutional" by going through the legal motions, while flaws in the process show it was not Constitutional. So we have another "hybrid" situation where people who believe the election and results were Constitutional and those who do not are left in a contradictory situation. Both sides have rights to their faith based beliefs that each can justify for themselves. But neither side has rights to punish the other for their political beliefs by depriving them of representation and freedom to express and exercise their beliefs. Some people DO believe in the Constitution and have rights to correct flaws that otherwise make the election undeterminable. Others DO NOT believe it was unlawful to take shortcuts "due to Covid pandemic conditions" and allow other State Officials to change ballot rules without voting through State Legislatures formally. Both sides deserve representation regardless of their beliefs on what was "good enough" to represent them. This is based on personal beliefs and standards which are rights belonging to people, not courts or federal govt, which is why we likely need a Convention of States and Parties to settle these disputes by offering equal representation to both sides, most likely organized by party to represent the voters by their common beliefs in groups and by regions.

It is up to free choice for people to decide whether or not to respect each other's beliefs.

Some believe the election was Constitutional while others do not and can explain where it violated national laws.

Not even God can force anyone to change their beliefs. Certainly Govt cannot be abused to regulate, mandate or punish people to coerce them into compliance or violation based on their beliefs.

We are heading to a Convention and solution to address these issues where people of all parties can work out better means of equally inclusive representation.

This election isn't the only example of disagreement over the rules. By holding conventions with diverse parties we can solve a lot more problems with partisan interference that have distorted the democratic process to create biased policies discriminating against dissenting citizens left out of the process. A lot more needs to be addressed and corrected, so the entire public will benefit instead of oppressing censoring or punishing people with objections and grievances.

Democrats will not accede to convene the Convention of States while there is a majority of Republican Governors and an balance of Senators 50/50....
Any changes to the Constitution requires a two thirds vote.

Amending the U.S. Constitution

To date, Congress has submitted 33 amendments to the Constitution, 27 of which were ratified by the states.

www.ncsl.org

1. For changes to the Constitution, I would require a consensus in advance as to what issues will be addressed and either the alternatives or the actual agreed solution worked out in advance BEFORE calling for a Convention. Otherwise neither side will agree to enter such a process for fear the resulting bias will make problems worse. Any party that agrees to a Convention likely holds an unfair advantage causing others to distrust and reject that. The only way I've gotten anyone to discuss this is if they feel assured they can control the outcome to guarantee they will get what they want and be protected from the process getting hijacked by others. Same reason people fear mediation as too easily hijacked. Doc7505 you may see it as Liberals refusing, but as many Conservatives refuse for fear of Liberals hijacking the process and completely dismantling what makes the Constitution work. The fear is mutual. Thus we must agree on points, principles, solutions and process in advance so there is agreement to stick to the plans. This only happens if everyone knows they will get what they want.
2. In advance for any such Convention, I would start with conferences between Party representatives willing to form a consensus on making a list of problems/objections and potential solutions. 3. I am guessing the solution of having a third or fourth level of laws would be managed by the people, similar to parties and media that remain outside of govt: a. Local councils that mediate "health and safety" policies within districts so residents agree to the same rules and process they decide for themselves democratically similar to HOA and city ordinances b. A council of reps per party to address complaints of political abuses, conflicts of interest, biases in beliefs or creeds interfering in govt policy remaining neutral and all inclusive, or other ethics or Constitutional violations. If we can set that up first, and organize bipartisan solutions, then the most effective reforms that come from such collaborations could lead to formal reforms of govt passed by Conventions or by Congress as agreed on by people states and parties as public solutions. Any local solutions not agreed on can be implemented locally or adopted by other groups without imposing by state or federal govt unless agreed upon by those citizens.

 

[d0gbreath]

Others DO NOT believe it was unlawful to take shortcuts "due to Covid pandemic conditions" and allow other State Officials to change ballot rules without voting through State Legislatures formally.

Changes to election dates, procedures, and administration in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

Voting Laws Roundup 2020

Legislatures largely made it easier for voters to cast their ballots this year, but a backlash against voting access is expected in 2021.

www.brennancenter.org

This specific case is over a Virginia Board of Elections rule issued in August that allowed mail-in ballots without a postmark to be received up to three days after the November election.

Why have a Board of Elections if only the state legislature can make election decisions?
Have a convention to discuss amending the constitution. Take out the state legislature part and allow the states to make election rules as they see fit. The Virginia legislature had three months to address the Board of Elections ruling and obviously didn't have a problem with that ruling.

 

[Roudy]

Biden won the election and there was no cheating. Again no entity including law enforcement has found any evidence of fraud. You live in a fantasy land. There were no deep state Republicans. Just Republicans who refused to help Trump steal the election.

Full denial is always the defense of the Democrats. There is a truck load of evidence for any and all kinds of election malfeasance. State level courts overstepped the authority of the state legislatures in changing election laws and then, color me shocked, they didn't want to hear the evidence in court.

Just like they didn't think the Hunter situation was nothing or at least noteworthy to look into or write about. Democrat are professional criminals that know how to get away with the crimes they commit. Most of them are scumbag lawyers to begin with.

 

[emilynghiem]

Others DO NOT believe it was unlawful to take shortcuts "due to Covid pandemic conditions" and allow other State Officials to change ballot rules without voting through State Legislatures formally.

Changes to election dates, procedures, and administration in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

Voting Laws Roundup 2020

Legislatures largely made it easier for voters to cast their ballots this year, but a backlash against voting access is expected in 2021.

www.brennancenter.org

This specific case is over a Virginia Board of Elections rule issued in August that allowed mail-in ballots without a postmark to be received up to three days after the November election.

Why have a Board of Elections if only the state legislature can make election decisions?
Have a convention to discuss amending the constitution. Take out the state legislature part and allow the states to make election rules as they see fit. The Virginia legislature had three months to address the Board of Elections ruling and obviously didn't have a problem with that ruling.

More than just postmarks. The contested rules were regarding using mail-in ballots instead of absentee that are notarized.

The issue of standing complicates the connection between the state process as elected per state and the impact on national representation of other states.

Similar to the rule changes for President and VP that had to be made because of complications introduced by partisan politics.

I agree we need a Constitutional Convention. Not to remove more safeguard restrictions from voting but to detach partisan conditions on voters so that doesn't manipulate representation and taxation by party. Those influences need to remain separate from federal govt that should remain neutral, not conditioned by political biases in belief to the exclusion or discrimination against others.