41 % of voters say election could be ‘stolen’ from The Donald

Contumacious

Radical Freedom
Aug 16, 2009
20,251
2,894
280
Adjuntas, PR , USA
41 percent of voters say election could be ‘stolen’ from Trump



donald_trump_august_19_2015_cropped_1.jpg



.
 
They would have to explain why the "thieves" who would "steal" the election would not steal the Senate as well. It looks like HRC may win Florida and Ohio (if there was a theft to take place, why not steal both of them and Texas while you are at it????) but Portman (OH) and Rubio (FL) look like they may keep their seats.

Ask this 41% how in the hell that could happen if the election was being "stolen"?

Would you, please?
 
They would have to explain why the "thieves" who would "steal" the election would not steal the Senate as well. It looks like HRC may win Florida and Ohio (if there was a theft to take place, why not steal both of them and Texas while you are at it????) but Portman (OH) and Rubio (FL) look like they may keep their seats.

Ask this 41% how in the hell that could happen if the election was being "stolen"?

Would you, please?
That's their story and they're stickin' to it!
 
The leftist media only needs to sway a few percent of voters to swing an election. They make the GOP nominee look bad and then they lose. Its "rigged" by the media, instead of presenting unbiased news. Granted Trump is a moronic flawed candidate. Anyone with a 3-digit IQ could have made a better case for Trump, even with the Bimbo Eruptions. Trump is more moral than Bill Clinton, QED. If Bill was defended by the press as morally qualified, they need to layoff Trump. Trump needs to make the argument that he IS qualified by naming his cabinet and his agenda, especially for the 1st 100-days. The nuclear trigger concern goes away when he names a good SECDEF, etc. Trump can't just whine about Hillary, he needs to make the case for running the country better than Hillary.
 
And lots of Americans believe in Bigfoot and he's not going to get elected either. I've said it so many times now and still it continues, republicans. conservatives, and other right wingers whine about everything, point fingers at everyone and are completely useless.

No nation was ever founded by conservatives, for in order to do so, you'd need to stop whining and do something - or by clueless libertarians who think all things started at their birth.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/educa...history-of-the-united-states-post6429110.html

No nation was ever founded by conservatives, no positive policy was ever created by conservatives, in order to do something, anything, they'd have to stop whining and pointing fingers, but then what would they to be.
 
The leftist media only needs to sway a few percent of voters to swing an election. They make the GOP nominee look bad and then they lose. Its "rigged" by the media, instead of presenting unbiased news. Granted Trump is a moronic flawed candidate. Anyone with a 3-digit IQ could have made a better case for Trump, even with the Bimbo Eruptions. Trump is more moral than Bill Clinton, QED. If Bill was defended by the press as morally qualified, they need to layoff Trump. Trump needs to make the argument that he IS qualified by naming his cabinet and his agenda, especially for the 1st 100-days. The nuclear trigger concern goes away when he names a good SECDEF, etc. Trump can't just whine about Hillary, he needs to make the case for running the country better than Hillary.



Yes, indeed.

Pravda, aka, NY Times, USA, CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, Washington Post, et al) are part of Hillary Amen Corner.
 
Who made that up for you
The leftist media only needs to sway a few percent of voters to swing an election. They make the GOP nominee look bad and then they lose. Its "rigged" by the media, instead of presenting unbiased news. Granted Trump is a moronic flawed candidate. Anyone with a 3-digit IQ could have made a better case for Trump, even with the Bimbo Eruptions. Trump is more moral than Bill Clinton, QED. If Bill was defended by the press as morally qualified, they need to layoff Trump. Trump needs to make the argument that he IS qualified by naming his cabinet and his agenda, especially for the 1st 100-days. The nuclear trigger concern goes away when he names a good SECDEF, etc. Trump can't just whine about Hillary, he needs to make the case for running the country better than Hillary.
 
The leftist media only needs to sway a few percent of voters to swing an election.

They make the GOP nominee look bad and then they lose.

Its "rigged" by the media, instead of presenting unbiased news.

Granted Trump is a moronic flawed candidate.

Okay, now the question becomes why the Media would not be as effective in swaying those to vote against Portman and Rubio. I mean, if you want HRC to become President, why not lambast the entire GOP instead of just the head of the ticket. Whatever they are supposedly doing is having no effect on most of the GOP seats.

Lotsa red left on the map.
 
The leftist media only needs to sway a few percent of voters to swing an election. They make the GOP nominee look bad and then they lose. Its "rigged" by the media, instead of presenting unbiased news. Granted Trump is a moronic flawed candidate. Anyone with a 3-digit IQ could have made a better case for Trump, even with the Bimbo Eruptions. Trump is more moral than Bill Clinton, QED. If Bill was defended by the press as morally qualified, they need to layoff Trump. Trump needs to make the argument that he IS qualified by naming his cabinet and his agenda, especially for the 1st 100-days. The nuclear trigger concern goes away when he names a good SECDEF, etc. Trump can't just whine about Hillary, he needs to make the case for running the country better than Hillary.
And this would be an example of that ignorance and stupidity.
 
The leftist media only needs to sway a few percent of voters to swing an election. They make the GOP nominee look bad and then they lose. Its "rigged" by the media, instead of presenting unbiased news. Granted Trump is a moronic flawed candidate. Anyone with a 3-digit IQ could have made a better case for Trump, even with the Bimbo Eruptions. Trump is more moral than Bill Clinton, QED. If Bill was defended by the press as morally qualified, they need to layoff Trump. Trump needs to make the argument that he IS qualified by naming his cabinet and his agenda, especially for the 1st 100-days. The nuclear trigger concern goes away when he names a good SECDEF, etc. Trump can't just whine about Hillary, he needs to make the case for running the country better than Hillary.
Give her some cheese.
 
They would have to explain why the "thieves" who would "steal" the election would not steal the Senate as well. It looks like HRC may win Florida and Ohio (if there was a theft to take place, why not steal both of them and Texas while you are at it????) but Portman (OH) and Rubio (FL) look like they may keep their seats.

Ask this 41% how in the hell that could happen if the election was being "stolen"?

Would you, please?

You're thinking *way* too hard. This isn't about reason or evidence. Its about emotion. Just feel.
 
The leftist media only needs to sway a few percent of voters to swing an election. They make the GOP nominee look bad and then they lose. Its "rigged" by the media, instead of presenting unbiased news. Granted Trump is a moronic flawed candidate. Anyone with a 3-digit IQ could have made a better case for Trump, even with the Bimbo Eruptions. Trump is more moral than Bill Clinton, QED. If Bill was defended by the press as morally qualified, they need to layoff Trump. Trump needs to make the argument that he IS qualified by naming his cabinet and his agenda, especially for the 1st 100-days. The nuclear trigger concern goes away when he names a good SECDEF, etc. Trump can't just whine about Hillary, he needs to make the case for running the country better than Hillary.

And by 'make the candidate look bad', you mean quote him accurately?
 

Forum List

Back
Top