40 New Scientific Papers Assert that Global Warming is Horse Manure

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
63,590
Reaction score
16,840
Points
2,220
'Horse Manure', that is the scientific term for 'Bull Shit', lol.


40 New Scientific Papers Say Global Warming Does Not Exist

Hundreds of scientists involved in 40 recent scientific papers say the scare about global warming is based on hysteria and false science.

Over 40 scientific papers on the global warming hoax have been published in just the first three months of 2018. What their charts show is that “nothing climatically unusual is happening.“


Breitbart.com reports: In the chart below from a study by Polovodova et al, we see that 20th century warming is perfectly normal in a long-term historical context. It was no warmer – indeed, is slightly cooler – than either the Roman Warm Period or the Medieval Warming Period.

Holocene-Cooling-European-Continent-Polovodova-Asteman-2018.jpg
 
Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.
 
Breitbart.com reports: In the chart below from a study by Polovodova et al, we see that 20th century warming is perfectly normal in a long-term historical context. It was no warmer – indeed, is slightly cooler – than either the Roman Warm Period or the Medieval Warming Period.
Another rightard dumb fuck takes local data for global data.
 
Breitbart.com reports: In the chart below from a study by Polovodova et al, we see that 20th century warming is perfectly normal in a long-term historical context. It was no warmer – indeed, is slightly cooler – than either the Roman Warm Period or the Medieval Warming Period.
Another rightard dumb fuck takes local data for global data.
The argument in the link is the reverse of that.
 
Breitbart.com reports: In the chart below from a study by Polovodova et al, we see that 20th century warming is perfectly normal in a long-term historical context. It was no warmer – indeed, is slightly cooler – than either the Roman Warm Period or the Medieval Warming Period.
Another rightard dumb fuck takes local data for global data.

Ghey

That's the established narrative that quite obviously has fallen flat on its face in the last 20 years. Research has proven that most people base their perception on the climate by what they are seeing locally....

As such, when people in Europe and America are having to use nut sack warmers for 9 months out of each year they aren't going to give a shit about climate change which is exactly what we are seeing.

C'mon now.... the religion and its followers have been preaching the whole average temperature crap for 20 years. And guess what..... it's become the least effective campaign in the history of the world. In the real world the science isn't mattering..... in the proof of that is staggering.
 
Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.
They're in the link. A horde.
Actually no, those are all studies of the effects of global climate change on small areas and they don't say what you think they do. Plus there are only a few listed, not 40.
 
Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.
They're in the link. A horde.
Actually no, those are all studies of the effects of global climate change on small areas and they don't say what you think they do. Plus there are only a few listed, not 40.
It's the cumulative that matters. That's how climate data is collected. And there are a horde of scientists.
 
Breitbart.com reports: In the chart below from a study by Polovodova et al, we see that 20th century warming is perfectly normal in a long-term historical context. It was no warmer – indeed, is slightly cooler – than either the Roman Warm Period or the Medieval Warming Period.
Another rightard dumb fuck takes local data for global data.

Ghey

That's the established narrative that quite obviously has fallen flat on its face in the last 20 years. Research has proven that most people base their perception on the climate by what they are seeing locally....

As such, when people in Europe and America are having to use nut sack warmers for 9 months out of each year they aren't going to give a shit about climate change which is exactly what we are seeing.

C'mon now.... the religion and its followers have been preaching the whole average temperature crap for 20 years. And guess what..... it's become the least effective campaign in the history of the world. In the real world the science isn't mattering..... in the proof of that is staggering.
But the campaign has been very effective. They've successfully undermined economies. That's how you leverage gov control.
 
I, for one, am relieved to learn that climate change is a hoax. I've grown weary of cleaner air standards and having to see all those horrendous solar panels on the roofs of homes. And....I actually saw an electric car charging station in a mall parking lot!!! When will it end?

The best part, this news will only assist the GOP Congress as they continue their important work of cutting the debt and deficit!
 
Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.
They're in the link. A horde.
Actually no, those are all studies of the effects of global climate change on small areas and they don't say what you think they do. Plus there are only a few listed, not 40.
It's the cumulative that matters. That's how climate data is collected. And there are a horde of scientists.
LOL, keep tryin.
 
'Horse Manure', that is the scientific term for 'Bull Shit', lol.


40 New Scientific Papers Say Global Warming Does Not Exist

Hundreds of scientists involved in 40 recent scientific papers say the scare about global warming is based on hysteria and false science.

Over 40 scientific papers on the global warming hoax have been published in just the first three months of 2018. What their charts show is that “nothing climatically unusual is happening.“


Breitbart.com reports: In the chart below from a study by Polovodova et al, we see that 20th century warming is perfectly normal in a long-term historical context. It was no warmer – indeed, is slightly cooler – than either the Roman Warm Period or the Medieval Warming Period.

Holocene-Cooling-European-Continent-Polovodova-Asteman-2018.jpg
LOL Breibart! And they lie. Here is the abstract from one of those papers they claim shows no warming.

Global warming in the context of 2000 years of Australian alpine temperature and snow cover

Abstract
Annual resolution reconstructions of alpine temperatures are rare, particularly for the Southern Hemisphere, while no snow cover reconstructions exist. These records are essential to place in context the impact of anthropogenic global warming against historical major natural climate events such as the Roman Warm Period (RWP), Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA) and Little Ice Age (LIA). Here we show for a marginal alpine region of Australia using a carbon isotope speleothem reconstruction, warming over the past five decades has experienced equivalent magnitude of temperature change and snow cover decline to the RWP and MCA. The current rate of warming is unmatched for the past 2000 years and seasonal snow cover is at a minimum. On scales of several decades, mean maximum temperatures have undergone considerable change ≈ ± 0.8 °C highlighting local scale susceptibility to rapid temperature change, evidence of which is often masked in regional to hemisphere scale temperature reconstructions.
Global warming in the context of 2000 years of Australian alpine temperature and snow cover

Ever consider investigating your source, Jim?
 
'Horse Manure', that is the scientific term for 'Bull Shit', lol.


40 New Scientific Papers Say Global Warming Does Not Exist

Hundreds of scientists involved in 40 recent scientific papers say the scare about global warming is based on hysteria and false science.

Over 40 scientific papers on the global warming hoax have been published in just the first three months of 2018. What their charts show is that “nothing climatically unusual is happening.“


Breitbart.com reports: In the chart below from a study by Polovodova et al, we see that 20th century warming is perfectly normal in a long-term historical context. It was no warmer – indeed, is slightly cooler – than either the Roman Warm Period or the Medieval Warming Period.

Holocene-Cooling-European-Continent-Polovodova-Asteman-2018.jpg
Late summer temperature reconstruction based on tree-ring density for Sygera Mountain, southeastern Tibetan Plateau


Abstract

Although several tree-ring density-based summer/late summer temperature reconstructions have been developed on the Tibetan Plateau (TP), the understanding of the local/regional characteristics of summer temperature fluctuations on a long-term scale in some regions is still limited. To improve our understanding in these aspects, more local or regional summer temperature reconstructions extending back over several centuries are required. In this study, a new mean latewood density (LWD) chronology from Abies georgei var. smithii from the upper tree line of Sygera Mountain on the southeastern TP was developed to reconstruct the late summer temperature variability since 1820 CE. The bootstrapped correlation analysis showed that the LWD chronology index was significantly and positively correlated with the late summer (August-September) mean temperatures (r1950–2008 = 0.63, p < 0.001) recorded at the nearest meteorological station and that this reconstruction has considerable potential to represent the late summer temperature variability at the regional scale. Our late summer temperature reconstruction revealed three obvious cold periods (i.e., 1872–1908, 1913–1937 and 1941–1966) and two relatively warm phases (i.e., 1821–1871 and 1970–2008) over the past two centuries. Comparisons of our reconstruction with other independent tree-ring-based temperature reconstructions, glacier fluctuations and historical documental records from neighboring regions showed good agreement in these relatively cold and warm
intervals. Our reconstruction exhibits an overall increasing temperature trend since the 1960s, providing new evidence supporting the recent warming of the TP. Moreover, our results also indicate that the late summer temperature variability of Sygera Mountain on the southeastern TP has potential links with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO).

Late summer temperature reconstruction based on tree-ring density for Sygera Mountain, southeastern Tibetan Plateau - ScienceDirect

Once again we see the paper saying something entirely different than what you lying article states. Not going to go through the rest, but I bet they all state something radically different than what the article states. Typical 'Conservative' lies.
 
Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.
They're in the link. A horde.
Looky, looky, another dumb ass that makes a statement, then does not do that himself. Looked up two of the links. They did not say what the lying bastard that wrote the article said they did.
 
Well post those bad boys up. Let's see some names and some peer reviews mang. Bring it on.
They're in the link. A horde.
Actually no, those are all studies of the effects of global climate change on small areas and they don't say what you think they do. Plus there are only a few listed, not 40.
It's the cumulative that matters. That's how climate data is collected. And there are a horde of scientists.
Stupid ass, you failed to check what the articles really said. You are so quick to agree to a lie.
 
Back
Top Bottom