4 islands stolen from Japan by the Moscow imperialists

The American authors of the Japanese constitution thought that Japan should be completely disarmed, as stipulated in Article 9. What they have now is a large police force to deal with domestic disturbances instigated by left-wing lunatics. But the first female prime minister now has a sweeping mandate to change that. President Trump praised the 'LANDSLIDE victory' and her leadership.



Her Liberal Democratic Party, allied with the Japan Innovation Party, claimed 352 of 465 seats in the House of Representatives on February 8, earning a two-thirds supermajority that could enable constitutional changes to expand Japan's military.

The constitution of Japan, which has lasted longer than any other constitution in the world without amendment or revision, has gained fame as the “pacifist constitution”. This is due to the constitution’s Article 9 and its vow to “renounce war as the sovereign right of the nation”. The full text of the article reads as follows:

Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes. In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.

In the years since 1947, Japan has incrementally increased the scope of activity allowed for the SDF, each time igniting debate and legal disputes over where the boundaries of the SDF’s activities lie. As yet, Japan does not possess what are considered to be “offensive” missiles. Prime Minister Abe has stated that any further expansion of Japan’s military role would require a constitutional revision. According to Abe, a revision of Article 9 is also necessary to abate concerns about the SDF’s status as constitutional and legitimate.

 
Last edited:
The American authors of the Japanese constitution thought that Japan should be completely disarmed, as stipulated in Article 9. What they have now is a large police force to deal with domestic disturbances instigated by left-wing lunatics. But the first female prime minister now has a sweeping mandate to change that. President Trump praised the 'LANDSLIDE victory' and her leadership.



Her Liberal Democratic Party, allied with the Japan Innovation Party, claimed 352 of 465 seats in the House of Representatives on February 8, earning a two-thirds supermajority that could enable constitutional changes to expand Japan's military.

The constitution of Japan, which has lasted longer than any other constitution in the world without amendment or revision, has gained fame as the “pacifist constitution”. This is due to the constitution’s Article 9 and its vow to “renounce war as the sovereign right of the nation”. The full text of the article reads as follows:

Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes. In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.

In the years since 1947, Japan has incrementally increased the scope of activity allowed for the SDF, each time igniting debate and legal disputes over where the boundaries of the SDF’s activities lie. As yet, Japan does not possess what are considered to be “offensive” missiles. Prime Minister Abe has stated that any further expansion of Japan’s military role would require a constitutional revision. According to Abe, a revision of Article 9 is also necessary to abate concerns about the SDF’s status as constitutional and legitimate.


So, do we agree that the four stolen 🇯🇵Japanese islands will be taken back, with force if needed?
 

I read a article today that said the Tongva tribe stole thier land from another smaller group of native Americans. These fruit cakes are out of thier minds...they ignore the tribes were in constant conflict with other tribes...trying to steal thier lands.​

Billie Eilish Solemnly Emerges After Native American Tribe Addresses Controversial ‘Stolen Land’ Remark

While some people praised Eilish for calling out United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, another account wrote, “Billie Eilish calls America ‘stolen land.’ Ok, Billie. Your $14,000,000 mansion in LA is built where the Tongva tribes once lived. Any plans on returning it?”

In a statement to the Daily Mail, the Tongva tribe spokesperson said, “As the First People of the greater Los Angeles basin, we do understand that her home is situated in our ancestral land. Eilish has not contacted our tribe directly regarding her property, we do value the instance when Public Figures provide visibility to the true history of this country.”


I have no idea who this Bill person is. Am I missing something?
 
I see you did not answer the question. Clumsy dodge.

I'll try once more. What would Russia do if Japan took those islands?
They cou;d do another Enola Gay, tell the Jap Imperialists to try it and find out, the Japs never seem to learn they just elected a China hating Imperialist *****, after what they did to China they should STFU.
 
Back
Top Bottom