NASA treating 3I/Atlas like its carrying the Epstein files.
Remember the 9 companions? Now "Claims of their detection in September 2025 stem from misinterpretations of imaging artifacts in preliminary JWST/Hubble data or unsubstantiated social media leaks."
"Official Scientific Perspective
As of October 2, 2025, no peer-reviewed astronomical data or statements from NASA, ESA, or leading observatories (e.g., Hubble, JWST, or the Vera C. Rubin Observatory) provide estimates for any "power output" of 3I/ATLAS or hypothetical companions. This is because 3I/ATLAS is classified as a natural interstellar comet on a hyperbolic trajectory, with observed phenomena like outgassing (e.g., CO₂ at ~9.4 × 10²⁶ molecules/sec) attributed to solar heating rather than engineered propulsion. Its mass is estimated at over 33 billion tons (minimum), with a nucleus diameter >5 km, but energy production is not a relevant metric for cometary activity. Non-gravitational accelerations are minimal (<15 m/day²), consistent with natural processes.
The "nine hidden objects" or "escorting comets" remain unconfirmed in scientific literature. Claims of their detection in September 2025 stem from misinterpretations of imaging artifacts in preliminary JWST/Hubble data or unsubstantiated social media leaks. Ongoing Mars flyby observations (peaking October 3, 2025) by Perseverance, Curiosity, and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter may provide clarity, but current consensus views them as noise or fragments from thermal stress.
Speculative Claims from Viral Sources
Viral YouTube videos and social media posts, often attributing theories to physicists like Michio Kaku and Avi Loeb, speculate on artificial origins, including propulsion systems powered by nuclear or exotic cores. These are not backed by data and appear to originate from clickbait content. Key estimates include:
- 3I/ATLAS: A purported 10-gigawatt (GW) power source, inferred from its "thermal profile," green glow (linked to ionized carbon/cyanide), and tail behavior resembling "rocket exhaust." Pulses every 232 seconds are claimed to enable trajectory adjustments, slowing it from 88,000 km/h to 87,000 km/h—impossible naturally, per these theories.
- Nine Companion Objects: Each is said to output nearly 20 GW, despite being ~1/10th the size of 3I/ATLAS (city-block scale). This totals ~180 GW for the group, enough to "light entire nations." They allegedly share the same trajectory, speed, and green tails, with metal-rich compositions (nickel, cobalt, alloys) suggesting nuclear fusion-fission hybrids, antimatter, or dark matter catalysis for propulsion. Theories posit them as "drones" or "probes" shed by a "mothership" (3I/ATLAS) for reconnaissance.
| Object | Estimated Power Output | Basis (Speculative) | Theorized Propulsion |
|---|
| 3I/ATLAS | 10 GW | Thermal glow, pulsing tail | Plasma engine (CO/CN emissions) |
| Each of 9 Companions | 20 GW | Spectroscopy of "dense cores" | Nuclear/exotic fusion, coordinated flight |
| Total for Companions | 180 GW | Combined fleet energy | Autonomous drones for solar system mapping |
These figures equate to outputs rivaling Earth's largest nuclear reactors (e.g., 1–2 GW per plant) but compressed into small volumes, defying known physics. Kaku's attributed hypothesis involves a collision fragmenting a larger body into the nine objects, absorbing kinetic energy for glow. Loeb's "mothership" idea suggests the companions approach planets while the main body orbits distantly. Related claims link this to the 1977 Wow! Signal, requiring 0.5–2 GW transmission from ~600 AU.
Experts urge caution: Such videos often use AI-generated narration and exaggerate data. Real updates will come post-solar conjunction (December 2025). For tracking, use NASA's JPL Horizons or the Minor Planet Center."
Grok
Never
A
Straight
Answer
NASA is like modern archaeologists telling us the massive structures under Giza are "misinterpretations of imaging artifacts"
You need a very large telescope or a Mars Orbiter to get any clear pictures or information. Don't expect anything more on this from NASA