If, on January 21, 2009, Georgie boy is still sitting behind the desk in the Oval office, then we have dictatorial issues. Until then, despite the questionable Constitutionality of the practice, he's not doing anything that has been deemed illegal. You and I both know that if he were the Democrats would be on him like white on rice.
I am of the opinion that Congress should work to eliminate this little gem of Presidential power. But they won't. And they won't for one reason. Because their guy might be the next President, and they certainly want him (or her) to have the same powers as the last guy. I don't like the use of signing statements, I don't care what party is in office.
"In 2006, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) introduced legislation that would have forbidden federal courts from legitimating presidential signing statements and allowed Congress to bring up the question of their constitutionality before the Supreme Court. But the bill never made it to the Senate floor and expired at the end of the 109th Congress."
Let's hope that new efforts to eliminate this little gem of Presidential power meets with more success that dying quietly in the back rooms of Congress. I don't like the idea of any President having this ability, even one I vote for.