3 Million more Epstein file files? Mostly all Bill Gates

That has nothing to do with the just released FBI tips.

Tips..... rumors, hearsay until checked out and corroborated or refuted.

And all except one were discounted one way or another. The last one was referred for an interview and discounted for the witness being unreliable.

Pretty easy to see, the allegations have no basis in fact.

It's funny to see you can't acknowledge the fact that there's nothing in those particular 'allegations'.

You can quit squirming now.
Not guilty in a court of law does not equal "innocent "

As far as our legal system goes, he's still "not guilty," but he's still not a man of food character as far as I'm concerned.

But then, the two of you share the same definition of *support." The difference is you believe it's all lies so you "support " him. She believes he a very flawed man of very questionable character so she doesn't support him.

I SUPPORT his vision for the country and everything he's doing, yet I agree he's not too much different from Bill Clinton although in his later years he doesn't seem to be the man he was in his younger years
 
That has nothing to do with the just released FBI tips.

Tips..... rumors, hearsay until checked out and corroborated or refuted.

And all except one were discounted one way or another. The last one was referred for an interview and discounted for the witness being unreliable.

Pretty easy to see, the allegations have no basis in fact.

It's funny to see you can't acknowledge the fact that there's nothing in those particular 'allegations'.

You can quit squirming now.
Not guilty in a court of law does not equal "innocent "

As far as our legal system goes, he's still "not guilty," but he's still not a man of good character as far as I'm concerned.

But then, the two of you share the same definition of *support." The difference is you believe it's all lies so you "support " him. She believes he a very flawed man of very questionable character so she doesn't support him.

I SUPPORT his vision for the country and everything he's doing, yet I agree he's not too much different from Bill Clinton although in his later years he doesn't seem to be the man he was in his younger years
 
That has nothing to do with the just released FBI tips.

Tips..... rumors, hearsay until checked out and corroborated or refuted.

And all except one were discounted one way or another. The last one was referred for an interview and discounted for the witness being unreliable.

Pretty easy to see, the allegations have no basis in fact.

It's funny to see you can't acknowledge the fact that there's nothing in those particular 'allegations'.

You can quit squirming now.


If you trust the government to always speak the truth and do the right thing, as opposed to protecting themselves, then you are even more naive than I thought.

Look, you can believe what you want, I don't care. I already made it clear that I don't want to make a definitive statement on a particular case that I would need to look into more, first. I did share my opinion just based on what I've observed about him through the years, and that should've been the end of that.

And sorry dude, but it's only "easy to see the allegations have no basis in fact" to the extreme Trump loyalists who would staunchly defend him if he committed murder in broad daylight, on live TV. Just like Trump said about you folk.

I don't feel like arguing with you anymore. I've wasted enough time here. We can agree to disagree, and you can argue with someone else.
 
I watched part of a interview of Bill Gates at home. And he does something that I thought was fantastically odd.
On his property, he built a small house where he tells his wife "he goes to think and work".
She is specifically not allowed to go there and disturb him.
"Work and think".... rrriiiiight. Uh huh - a man has alone time for days in a row and his wife is prohibited from walking in on him????? Really??? He doesn't have books in his hand, that is for sure.
 
I already made it clear that I don't want to make a definitive statement on a particular case that I would need to look into more, first.
Not too hard, based on, in this case, what was presented to the FBI and their collusions.

I didn't ask for your opinion of the man, only on what was presented in this particular file release. You've shown you can't be objective on what was presented to you.

And I'll tell you another thing BC, if any of those particular 'allegations' were proven to be true, I'd be first in line for Him to be tried.

The difference is you believe it's all lies so you "support " him.
I examine the facts and to this point they don't support that.

Judge not.....
 
Not too hard, based on, in this case, what was presented to the FBI and their collusions.

I didn't ask for your opinion of the man, only on what was presented in this particular file release. You've shown you can't be objective on what was presented to you.

And I'll tell you another thing BC, if any of those particular 'allegations' were proven to be true, I'd be first in line for Him to be tried.


I examine the facts and to this point they don't support that.

Judge not.....
LOL, as usual, Bcup is the only judge whose opinion counts.
 
Uh oh.....they got Trump again... :eusa_clap:


I read Trump is mentioned about 1500 times. We have a new record.

In the latest trove of Epstein emails released Friday, Attia appears chummy with the late, convicted sex offender, making crude jokes, offering to help Epstein live longer “for the ladies,” and gushing about Epstein’s “outrageous” lifestyle. Attia’s name appears more than 1,700 times in the trove of 3 million emails, including many personal email exchanges with Epstein.

In one 2015 email, Attia wrote: the “worst part about being your friend is that the life you lead is so outrageous, and yet I can’t tell a soul…” In another in 2016, Attia joked about diet with Epstein by saying: “P—y is, indeed, low carb. Still awaiting results on gluten, though.”


 
Last edited:
Not too hard, based on, in this case, what was presented to the FBI and their collusions.

I didn't ask for your opinion of the man, only on what was presented in this particular file release. You've shown you can't be objective on what was presented to you.

And I'll tell you another thing BC, if any of those particular 'allegations' were proven to be true, I'd be first in line for Him to be tried.


I examine the facts and to this point they don't support that.

Judge not.....
We all judge. You're not special
 
From Epstein to Netanyahu

Loved the torture video.


There's also a lot of odd pizza references. What is U9 Red Pizza
 
Last edited:
Marx's “for the sake of 300% profit, capital is ready for any crime” can be rephrased as “for the sake of ever-increasing doses of dopamine, capital monsters are ready for anything.”

And absolute impunity in the field of economic plunder (laissez-faire, minimal state intervention) inevitably leads to the lawlessness of snuff films.

I cannot imagine what mental and other powers the defenders of capitalism still have left to defend this devilish criminal formation.
 
Uh oh, they got Trump again.....

The latest batch of files released by the US Department of Justice includes three apparent bank statements detailing three money transfers of $25,000 each from the paedophile financier to the peer.


 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom