3 Million more Epstein file files? Mostly all Bill Gates

Tell us when you get information on Trump directly from Epstein, like we have with Gates and Clinton.
We have Epstein's first person emails describing that Trump knew about Epstein's children.

Now, do your little tap dance.
 
Your site has an update notice of May 2025.
Somebody did a redirect on an already deleted page.

My site? What the hell are you talking about? :lol: You're not listening. In numerous other posts, I posted the direct, complete link to the DOJ website. No shortcut link. The files were there. Everyone saw them.

I'm not surprised that now (a few days later) they took them down. In fact, I knew that would happen, that's why you were supposed to go to the site a few days, when it was up.

I have more I want to say on this, but right now I'm heading out the door to go to church. So I'll get back to this later today or tonight.
 
And now they all go to a site that's been dead since May 2025.

Go check all your links, they're all dead.

AGAIN, you're not listening. Let me say this slowly. Forget the damn shortlink. In OTHER posts, I posted the direct complete link to the DOJ website, and the link does NOT go to another site. It goes to the DOJ site. But the PDF is no longer there, it's no longer available.

Check the link in the post below. You can see for yourself that the link goes to the DOJ website, it doesn't re-direct anywhere.


ETA: Now please stop posting to me for now, because I'm literally heading out the door now and won't be able to answer until later.
 
All ears. So those pages you posted, in your opinion, are they true and correct accusations?
Good luck with that Dude. Bcup is a fence straddler and won't take a stand on anything--there will always be a qualification so that she can never be held accountable for a position on any issue.
 
[redacted] reported an unidentified female friend who was forced to perform oral sex on President Trump approximately 35 years ago in NJ. The friend told Alexis that she was approximately 13-14 years old when this occurred, and the friend allegedly bit President Trump while performing oral sex. The friend was allegedly hit in the face after she laughed about biting President Trump. The friend said she was also abused by Epstein.
Yeah beloved lib loon 30 year ago hearsay atrocities previously y unrevealed and lacking details
 
I have always thought he looked pervy too. And add the fact his wife divorced him. He must be a horrible person for that to happen. Normally a man as rich as he is should be an attractive marriage prospect to women. Plus she had kids with him, too. And she still wanted to divorce him. I can only imagine her level of disgust with him.
.

He's a cheap SOB too. I heard one story about him, after he was quite well-known and wealthy, standing in the line at a grocery store, making the line wait behind him while he searched his person for a 50¢ coupon for ice cream.


.
 
I did and for the fourth time, it goes directly to the site that was updated May 2025.

T.co is a X shortening tool. Someone made it on X.

Oh my word. I can't believe I have to repeat something this many times. I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT the shortened link! Yes, I know it's a shortening tool, that's what I told you earlier! For the 5th time now, in numerous OTHER posts I posted the direct, complete link to the DOJ website, and I gave you one of those posts showing that. And the link to the DOJ website still goes to the DOJ website, it doesn't re-direct anywhere. But last I checked they took down the pdf.

I'm beginning to think you're just trolling. You're trying to see how many times I'll repeat something. :lol: :lol:
 
Oh my word. I can't believe I have to repeat something this many times. I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT the shortened link! Yes, I know it's a shortening tool, that's what I told you earlier! For the 5th time now, in numerous OTHER posts I posted the direct, complete link to the DOJ website, and I gave you one of those posts showing that. And the link to the DOJ website still goes to the DOJ website, it doesn't re-direct anywhere. But last I checked they took down the pdf.
It doesn't matter, your link had that t.co in it, the last one you said here's the pdf it did too. Doesn't matter now does it, being as it's been taken down.It was after I said something about Mario Nawfal. In everyone of those posts it now goes to the dead end. Look, I found and posted the data sets that were listed yesterday that have been removed. Today, whatever some one has archived now has blacked out sections that weren't yesterday.
 
It doesn't matter, your link had that t.co in it, the last one you said here's the pdf it did too. Doesn't matter now does it, being as it's been taken down.It was after I said something about Mario Nawfal. In everyone of those posts it now goes to the dead end. Look, I found and posted the data sets that were listed yesterday that have been removed. Today, whatever some one has archived now has blacked out sections that weren't yesterday.

Yes, the DOJ took down the downloadable pdf for some reason. I already acknowledged that 3 or 4 times. I haven't heard an official reason why, but they also did the same thing on the 30th, then put it back later that day. So who knows?

In any event, since it was already out there, everyone has seen it. But that wasn't even all of it, it was only part of it, and redacted. If they put stuff THAT heinous and damning out there publicly... I can only imagine how bad the stuff they HAVEN'T released is.

That said, I highly doubt it will matter much, because the government isn't going to investigate this. They never investigate themselves. Not in a genuine way.

And it won't matter to the diehard Trump loyalists, who would still follow him even if he killed a baby in broad daylight.

As for everyone else, I think all this info (not just on Trump but on all of them) has finally awakened a lot of people, and now they understand we're a country run by criminals and sickos, and there's no voting our way out of it.
 
15th post
Like I asked before, do you accept the pdf info as true and correct?

Why does it matter what I think about it? I would need to look into it more, before answering your question. But unless something can be proven, then all we have is our opinions. That goes for all of us.

If you want my OPINION? I wouldn't be surprised at all if many of the allegations are true. There's more than enough evidence that he's a bad person. He's obviously a liar. And there's WAY too much smoke for there not to be any fire.

Also, you can tell a lot about a person by the company they keep. He was friends with Epstein, and he was friends with the Clintons. And his mentor was Roy Cohn, a sexual blackmailer and corrupt person.

Anyone who was friends with the Clintons and speaks highly of them is not someone I would ever trust. That's why I never got on the Trump train in the first place. And that was just my first reason, since then there have been about 50, 000 more reasons. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Why does it matter what I think about it? I would need to look into it more, before answering your question. But unless something can be proven, then all we have is our opinions. That goes for all of us.

If you want my OPINION? I wouldn't be surprised at all if many of the allegations are true. There's more than enough evidence that he's a bad person. He's obviously a liar. And there's WAY too much smoke for there not to be any fire.

Also, you can tell a lot about a person by the company they keep. He was friends with Epstein, and he was friends with the Clintons. And his mentor was Roy Cohn, a sexual blackmailer and corrupt person.

Anyone who was friends with the Clintons and speaks highly of them is not someone I would ever trust. That's why I never got on the Trump train in the first place. And that was just my first reason, since then there have been about 50, 000 more reasons. :lol:
Why does it matter what I think about it?

Well I thought you could make a reasonable judgement from what was just published.

Why can't you answer my question based on what was in yesterday's release of allegations, what the FBI's response to the allegations were.

Looks like facts don't flush with your hate for Trump does it?
 
Why does it matter what I think about it?

Well I thought you could make a reasonable judgement from what was just published.

Why can't you answer my question based on what was in yesterday's release of allegations, what the FBI's response to the allegations were.

Looks like facts don't flush with your hate for Trump does it?

I answered your question. If you think that someone can (or should) make a declarative statement about anything based on partial, limited information and before looking into it deeper...then that says a lot about you. What is wrong with wanting to investigate and dig deeper? That's what SHOULD be done, before people jump to a conclusion either way.

But I did give you my opinion, based on what I have observed about his character and patterns, for many years.
 
But I did give you my opinion, based on what I have observed about his character and patterns, for many years.
That has nothing to do with the just released FBI tips.

Tips..... rumors, hearsay until checked out and corroborated or refuted.

And all except one were discounted one way or another. The last one was referred for an interview and discounted for the witness being unreliable.

Pretty easy to see, the allegations have no basis in fact.

It's funny to see you can't acknowledge the fact that there's nothing in those particular 'allegations'.

You can quit squirming now.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom