3 hits to Kennedys melon in 5 seconds

[Soupnazi630]

Yea. There is.

The hole in Kennedy’s head and the film of the assassination plus the fact of Newtonian physics.

No there is not

There were NO holes at the front of his head and physics works against you

 

[BackAgain]

No there is not

Yes. There is.

There were NO holes at the front of his head

Right. Just the one. The entrance wound that all but took off a part of his head.

and physics works against you

No. It works to prove you wrong.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes. There is.


Right. Just the one. The entrance wound that all but took off a pet of his head.

No. It works to prove you wrong.

No here is not

There was no such entrance wound on the front. the ONLY entrance wound was in the back of his head

It does not prove me wrong it proves you do not know a damn thing about physics except the word Newton

 

[BackAgain]

No here is not

Yes. There is.

There was no such entrance wound on the front.

Of course there was.

the ONLY entrance wound was in the back of his head

Nope. That was an exit wound. But there WAS an entrance wound on his back. This is why we can know that there were at least two shooters.

It does not prove me wrong it proves you do not know a damn thing about physics except the word Newton

No. It proves you wrong. You just can’t see it or won’t admit.

Makes no difference, either way, now.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes. There is.


Of course there was.


Nope. That was an exit wound. But there WAS an entrance wound on his back. This is why we can know that there were at least two shooters.

No. It proves you wrong. You just can’t see it or won’t admit.

Makes no difference, either way, now.

No there is not

You are simply stating proven lies

there was no entrance wound anywhewre near the front of his head the only entrance wound was in the back and that is fact

Nothing proves me wrong physics proves you wrong

you do not have any evidence only fallacies

 

[BackAgain]

No there is not

Repeating your ignorance doesn’t support anything you say.

You are simply stating proven lies

False. I am restating facts which you need to disbelieve.

there was no entrance wound anywhewre near the front of his head

Yes. There was.

the only entrance wound was in the back and that is fact

No it’s not a “fact.” You simply accepted horseshit and now confident with “truth.”

Nothing proves me wrong physics proves you wrong

Physics proves you wrong and proves me right.

you do not have any evidence only fallacies

Im the one with the evidence. Not you.

Look. You’re very gullible. I get it. But that really doesn’t help your position at all.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Repeating your ignorance doesn’t support anything you say.


False. I am restating facts which you need to disbelieve.


Yes. There was.

No it’s not a “fact.” You simply accepted horseshit and now confident with “truth.”

Physics proves you wrong and proves me right.

Im the one with the evidence. Not you.

Look. You’re very gullible. I get it. But that really doesn’t help your position at all.

I am far better informed about this than you

You are stating lies which are disproven you are not stating facts

It is absolute fact which you cannot disprove. There were no entrance wounds to the front you can prsent no evidence to the contrary

You have no evidence of any kind especially physics which does not prove you right you cannot cite any physics proving you correct

The consppiracy people like you are always the naive and gullible saps

 

[BlackSand]

.

The people that know the real story about everything concerning President Kennedy's assassination ...
Are either dead or not telling anyone ... And that's pretty much the end of that story.

Feel free to speculate ... That's damn near been a national past time with some folks for decades.
I'm pretty sure it was the phone company behind it all.

.​

 

[Soupnazi630]

.

The people that know the real story about everything concerning President Kennedy's assassination ...
Are either dead or not telling anyone ... And that's pretty much the end of that story,

.​

They already told it

You just didnt listen

The story goes on

 

[BackAgain]

I am far better informed about this than you

Clearly not.

You are stating lies which are disproven you are not stating facts

No. You are stating absurd claims which you don’t recognize as bullshit. You’ve yet to state a fact.

It is absolute fact which you cannot disprove.

What you say isn’t a fact at all. And you can’t prove your own statements.

There were no entrance wounds to the front

Of course there was.

you can prsent no evidence to the contrary

I can and have. You have always failed to support your ignorant claims.

You have no evidence of any kind especially physics which does not prove you right you cannot cite any physics proving you correct

Wrong. You deny your own two eyes.

The consppiracy people like you are always the naive and gullible saps

I’m not a “conspiracy” guy just because I challenge the ridiculous conclusions of the Warren Commission. But you ARE amazingly gullible. You’ve been directed to lap up that shit. And you do.

 

[BlackSand]

They already told it

You just didnt listen

The story goes on

.

It's not that I didn't listen ... It's that your stupid ass believed what they said ...
But I understand how upset y'all get when someone doesn't play.

.​

 

[Soupnazi630]

Clearly not.

No. You are stating absurd claims which you don’t recognize as bullshit. You’ve yet to state a fact.

What you say isn’t a fact at all. And you can’t prove your own statements.

Of course there was.

I can and have. You have always failed to support your ignorant claims.

Wrong. You deny your own two eyes.

I’m not a “conspiracy” guy just because I challenge the ridiculous conclusions of the Warren Commission. But you ARE amazingly gullible. You’ve been directed to lap up that shit. And you do.

I am

I am stating facts which you cannot post evidence to challenge. The autopsy report and every eyewitness and every photograph taken of his head shows no entrance wound to the front


You have nothing but empty words


There were no entrasnce wounds to the front a fact you are hopeless against

Yes that makes you a gullible conspiracy dupe

You have no clue what the Warren Commission wrote

 

[Soupnazi630]

.

It's not that I didn't listen ... It's that your stupid ass believed what they said ...
But I understand how upset y'all get when someone doesn't play.

.​

No you did not listen

You are ignorant and know nothing except what you saw on Tv

 

[BlackSand]

No you did not listen

You are ignorant and know nothing except what you saw on Tv

.

You're not listening now ... Further proof of what I am saying.

Including the fact you don't need to tell me what you think ...
It's not like you were the first person to think it ...

.​

 

[BackAgain]

I am

You aren’t.

I am stating facts

No. You’re not.

You cannot support your absurd claims; and you haven’t.

 

[Soupnazi630]

.

You're not listening now ... Further proof of what I am saying.

Including the fact you don't need to tell me what you think ...
It's not like you were the first person to think it ...

.​

because you are ignorant stupid and wrong


The case was long since settled and everyone told their story of what happened. You just did not listen.

You are correct i am not the first to think it and you are not the first to NOT think at all

 

[Soupnazi630]

You aren’t.


No. You’re not.

You cannot support your absurd claims; and you haven’t.

I am

I have where is your evidence?????????

Oh you only have lies

 

[BackAgain]

I am

I have where is your evidence?????????

lol. Stop asserting mere claims and declaring (falsely) that they are “facts. They aren’t.

So, where is your “evidence?” As the proponent, you have the burden.

Go!

Oh you only have lies

No. I have logic and you don’t.

 

[Soupnazi630]

lol. Stop asserting mere claims and declaring (falsely) that they are “facts. They aren’t.

So, where is your “evidence?” As the proponent, you have the burden.

Go!

No. I have logic and you don’t.

Nope

I am stating doocumented proven claims. With photographs autopsy reports and eyewitnesses

You are the proponent that he was shot from the front and the burden is on you. You have no evidence of any kind whatsoever''

logic destroys you and proves me correct

All you have is NEwston newton newton which proves nothing. The rest of physics proves how little you know

 

[BackAgain]

Nope

I am stating doocumented proven claims.

Claims. The only thing you’re written so far that is accurate.

With photographs autopsy reports and eyewitnesses

Which you don’t understand.

You are the proponent

No. I am the one denying that he was shot from behind which was your claim.

that he was shot from the front and the burden is on you. You have no evidence of any kind whatsoever''

You clearly don’t get the concept of burden of persuasion. I excuse your pitiable ignorance.

logic destroys you and proves me correct

Unless you someday (at long last) make use of logic, we will never know.

All you have is NEwston newton newton which proves nothing.

Nope. I offered that as one factor worth considering, which you don’t know how to do. But it proves a lot. You missed that.

The rest of physics proves how little you know

Not at all.