Plus Missery said I was wrong then posted a link that confirmed everything I said. Good job!
You guys need to find some more random untraceable comments lol
You were wrong.
You said something idiotic about time travel.
Waiting for room to seat a party of 25 is not racism.
I get that your bias blinds you to this fact, but it is a fact none the less.
First you said they were treated bad because of confronting a deaf person. I asked why were they made to wait 2 hours in the first place and you shrugged your shoulders unable to type a reason but one thing you KNOW for certain is that it WAS NOT racism.
Now you are trying to be funny by pretending I said waiting = Racism.
Keep dancing, you don't what it is the only thing you seem to know for sure is WHAT IT ISNT.
None of what you posted in this comment is true.
Here is exactly what I think happen, based on the different articles, explanations and perspectives I have read:
@
hjmick of USMB lives down there. He said the restaurant in question is not very large and does not have a lot of seating to begin with.
Mr. Brown (the aggrieved) called to say he had a large party coming in.
The restaurant didn't set aside seating because they did not want to lose the revenue in the event Mr. Browns party was a no show.
Mr. Brown and party arrive, and they are forced to wait...they expected to be seated right away, and they were upset that they were inconvenienced.
According to the article @ News One, there was only one area of the restaurant that could accommodate Mr Browns party of 25...so some people who arrived after Mr. Browns party were seated ahead of Mr. Browns party. This only served to further fuel the animosity.
FTR, it is these events for which IMO the restaurant bears the blame.
If Mr. Brown called ahead, the restaurant management should have informed him that either they could not hold a section that large open at that time, or that they would...and if that was the case, they should have.
Also, it should have been explained that only one section was available that would accommodate a party of 25 seated together, and that was why some other guests were being seated ahead of Mr. Brown's party.
None of that is racism, it's unprofessionalism.
Now some time during this waiting period, it has been purported that some member of the party made racial statements about white people receiving preferential treatment, being seated while Mr. Brown's party was forced to wait.
Also, this was expounded on by relating an event where a misunderstanding was escalated into a major scene by a member of Mr Brown's party over what was perceived as racism, but was actually by a deaf patron who was not ignoring, but could not hear the offended woman's entreaty for an apology.
This report has been confirmed by at least one website as being from an eyewitness to these events, an employee of the restaurant.
The scene is what led directly to one of the other patrons, who was already dining, complaining that she felt threatened...it could have been the family of the deaf woman for all we know...that information has not come out yet.
NONE of what I have described here is racism towards Mr Brown's party.
In fact, I would propose that, if these reports are correct, that the restaurant was within their rights at this time to ask the party to leave.
Instead, the restaurant staff and management attempted to resolve the situation as best they could, given the circumstances, perhaps because they felt some amount of responsibility in not reserving, or explaining that they would not be able to reserve, a section for Mr Brown's party.
At this point, none of what had transpired was the result of racism against Mr Brown's party.
Here, we have to extrapolate, and use some common sense.
We know that Mr Brown is a regular customer.
We know that Mr. Brown has never experienced racism at this establishment before.
We know that the population of North Charleston is 46% black, so we can assume that Wild Wing Cafe has a good number of Black patrons.
We know we are only getting one side of the story from Mr. Brown.
So, at this point, the restaurant staff and management are still trying to work out an arrangement for seating Mr. Brown's party.
One of the members of Mr. Brown's party begins to video record the conversation.
Mr. Brown attests to the fact that THIS is the reason the are refused service.
The media, and now the left, wants to claim racism based solely on the reporting of one side of the story...because that is what they do...fan the flames of racism at every opportunity.
It MUST be racism, African-American's MUST be painted as victims.
That is the narrative.
Don't question the narrative, don't look any deeper, don't use common sense...just swallow this one-sided story hook line and sinker...
