24 Points from Barr

[iceberg]

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump.

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late Spring or Summer 2020.

2. The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign. That’s what electronic surveillance is.

3. Regarding FBI’s actions in surveilling Trump campaign associates, it was a “travesty” and there were “many abuses.”

4. From “day one,” the FBI investigation generated exculpatory information (tending to point to the targets’ innocence) and nothing that corroborated Russia collusion.

5. It’s a “big deal” to use U.S. law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party and I cannot think of another recent instance where this happened.

you can read the rest on their site.

 

[iceberg]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

 

[iceberg]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

dunno. this is barrs list.

is it normal to falsify evidence to go after people in order to prove you should be going after them?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump.

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late Spring or Summer 2020.

Are they looking for maximum impact on the election?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

dunno. this is barrs list.

is it normal to falsify evidence to go after people in order to prove you should be going after them?

Sadly, yes it probably is.

Do you find it odd the IG report did not suggest anyone be charged with any crimes or administrative punishments?

 

[iceberg]

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump.

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late Spring or Summer 2020.

Are they looking for maximum impact on the election?

potentially. but would that be like going for max impact on impeaching people to hide info such as this?

seems to be SOP.

 

[iceberg]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

dunno. this is barrs list.

is it normal to falsify evidence to go after people in order to prove you should be going after them?

Sadly, yes it probably is.

Do you find it odd the IG report did not suggest anyone be charged with any crimes or administrative punishments?

i don't think this is over. we've not yet begun to divide ourselves up and go to war yet.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

dunno. this is barrs list.

is it normal to falsify evidence to go after people in order to prove you should be going after them?

Sadly, yes it probably is.

Do you find it odd the IG report did not suggest anyone be charged with any crimes or administrative punishments?

i don't think this is over. we've not yet begun to divide ourselves up and go to war yet.

nope, but they sure are pushing us that way. Seems to be the goal.

 

[captkaos]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

The indication is they didn't suspect Trump. So they should have let him know of the Potential Infiltration of his campaign and done it confidentially. Instead of leaking garbage and lying to try and make up a crime to investigate.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Another liar enters the fray.

 

[g5000]

Minister

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump.

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late Spring or Summer 2020.

2. The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign. That’s what electronic surveillance is.

3. Regarding FBI’s actions in surveilling Trump campaign associates, it was a “travesty” and there were “many abuses.”

4. From “day one,” the FBI investigation generated exculpatory information (tending to point to the targets’ innocence) and nothing that corroborated Russia collusion.

5. It’s a “big deal” to use U.S. law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party and I cannot think of another recent instance where this happened.

you can read the rest on their site.

The Reich Minister of Propaganda has spoken!

 

[g5000]

I read the Reich Minister's 24 Points, and I don't see anything in there about the imminent arrest of Peter Strzok, Andrew Weissmann, James Comey, Sally Yates, Rod Rosenstein, John Brennan, James Clapper, and Susan Rice as promised.

Huh!

 

[bripat9643]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

He shouldn't have even been a suspect. In the case of Hillary and Feinstein, the FBI notified them that they had foreign spies in their midst.

 

[bripat9643]

I read the Reich Minister's 24 Points, and I don't see anything in there about the imminent arrest of Peter Strzok, Andrew Weissmann, James Comey, Sally Yates, Rod Rosenstein, John Brennan, James Clapper, and Susan Rice as promised.

Huh!

Apparently you didn't read this one.

24. Why haven’t you already thrown people in prison? “These things take time.” The government has to have proof beyond a reasonable doubt before we indict; it’s a substantial hurdle. Nobody is going to be indicted and go to jail unless that standard is met.

 

[Siete]

Barr is the epitome of "deep state" - 100% rogue, trump cartel ass kisser.

 

[B. Kidd]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

dunno. this is barrs list.

is it normal to falsify evidence to go after people in order to prove you should be going after them?

Sadly, yes it probably is.

Do you find it odd the IG report did not suggest anyone be charged with any crimes or administrative punishments?

i don't think this is over. we've not yet begun to divide ourselves up and go to war yet.

That ain't happening if Barr and Durham do their job and put our Constitution and Country first.

 

[bripat9643]

Barr is the epitome of "deep state" - 100% rogue, trump cartel ass kisser.

Utter horseshit. He's a political appointee. The deep state is composed of life time career bureaucrats.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

Trump should do that to the Stalinist democrats, right?

 

[Slade3200]

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

Is that the standard operating procedures?

Do they normally go to suspects and talk about it with them?

He shouldn't have even been a suspect. In the case of Hillary and Feinstein, the FBI notified them that they had foreign spies in their midst.

Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Hillary and Feinstein suspected targets of spy’s while Trump and crew were suspected of working with spy’s?