235 Years

because no President before was attacked with the level of lawfare Trump has seen?

The question never had to be asked before, because no one asked it.

And he didn't get absolute immunity.
And another victimhood response, as predicted in the OP.
 
I've said I'm being persecuted?

This is why I no longer bother. You people just can't stop lying. Just like your Orange God.

No but Trump is, by all these stupid lawsuits. Or are you now saying the trials are all completely valid and not motivated by politics?

Do show your cards, Mac. I mean not that we don't already know.
 
It's not a victimhood response, it's the reality of the situation.

That you can't see it or refuse to see it isn't my problem.

There is a poster I really used to get after here bc her ideas were atrocious and wildly inconsistent. Then I found out she suffers from a degenerative neurological condition and never commented again. It was clear that she didn't have clear thinking anymore.

I begin to wonder if that's the case for Mac. I'm being serious. Just not clear thinking at all.
 
Yep. The next White House could be full of convicted felons, convicted fraudsters, adjudicated sexual assaulters and Fifth Amendment pleaders.

If that happens, we, as a country, deserve it.
Currently occupied by pedos, money launderers, drug, human and child traffickers
 
1719925712093.webp
 
George Washington's first term began in 1789. Since then, 235 years, no President has asked for absolute immunity, much less received it.

I wonder why it's needed, so badly, now.

Let me guess: It involves victimhood.

LAWFARE. Have you noticed the Democrats OBSCENE behavior since November 2016?
If you haven't, you're either blinded by partisanship, or beyond stupid.
 
You loved the Court when it was a political branch for YOU. That was YOUR game and YOUR rules, and it was fine.

Now we're playing your game by your rules. You hate it. Too bad. We used to play nice and do not anymore. Oh well.
How was the court a “political branch” for us?
 
George Washington's first term began in 1789. Since then, 235 years, no President has asked for absolute immunity, much less received it.

I wonder why it's needed, so badly, now.

Let me guess: It involves victimhood.
235 years and no citizen has ever been criminally prosecuted simultaneously in four separate jurisdictions.

Even a Bidenfluffer such as yourself can understand that math.
 
It is amazing how Brazil stood up to those that sought to bring down its republic and its courts reigned in the power of the presidency, while in the US, the home of the longest surviving Republic, we have a great portion of the population that seeks to bring down its democratic institutions abetted by a compliant Supreme Court.

The Roman Republic fell under similar circumstances when a great portion of the population just gave up on it and sought a strong man. History repeats itself.
 
There is a poster I really used to get after here bc her ideas were atrocious and wildly inconsistent. Then I found out she suffers from a degenerative neurological condition and never commented again. It was clear that she didn't have clear thinking anymore.

I begin to wonder if that's the case for Mac. I'm being serious. Just not clear thinking at all.

Mac did have some very good cognitive skills and logical deduction. He's consumed by orange man now.
 
It is amazing how Brazil stood up to those that sought to bring down its republic and its courts reigned in the power of the presidency, while in the US, the home of the longest surviving Republic, we have a great portion of the population that seeks to bring down its democratic institutions abetted by a compliant Supreme Court.
The Roman Republic fell under similar circumstances when a great portion of the population just gave up on it and sought a strong man. History repeats itself.

And yet an unfettered and unaccountable executive bureaucracy that can set its own rules based on vague laws is somehow a "democratic institution"?
 
Back
Top Bottom