Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It matters not what human is at the head of a corrupt government. If he is a good man, the corrupt establishment will attack him. If he is corrupt, the corrupt establishment will protect him. God's judgment is coming to destroy human government because in the last days it will become entirely corrupt, just like it is now.He's not, he sent us Trump, and you all followed the False Prophet.
View attachment 746951
well then why didnt they of the vote in favor of the bill instead of against ? it would take no more effort to vote for rather than against whether its already law or not ..... and its a stand alone bill requiring medical aid to a baby that survives an abortion .This is already the law. It's why Gosnell is spending his time serving out three life sentences.
It's called "infanticide" and it's very illegal. If you had any functioning brain at all, you'd know that.
Infanticide and American criminal justice (1980-2018) - PubMed
Maternal infanticide, or the murder of a child in the first year of life by its mother, is a subject both compelling and repulsive. The victim is innocent, but the perpetrator may be a victim too. In the USA, mentally ill women who commit infanticide may receive long prison sentences or even the...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
well then why didnt they of the vote in favor of the bill instead of against ?
it would take no more effort to vote for rather than against whether its already law or not ..... and its a stand alone bill requiring medical aid to a baby that survives an abortion .
so a baby that doesnt survive an abortion isnt a baby but one that does is ?? so its all about location eh ... face it lib babies in the womb and outside of the womb ARE BOTH BABIES ! and both have a right to life !Apparently you don't know it's already against the law to kill a baby. That's how stupid you are.
apparently dems have no problem voting on so called show bills .... over 200 voted on the bill ...why did dems vote on the bill ?I am 100% against show bills like this that do nothing. I have condemned the Democrats recently for doing the same thing. They are stupid and a waste of government resources. As the link previously shows, this is ALREADY illegal.
I am Pro-life and I would have voted against it for that reason.
These grandstanding efforts need to stop. They won't as long as people such as yourself will defend them.
apparently dems have no problem voting on so called show bills .... over 200 voted on the bill ...why did dems vote on the bill ?
I am 100% against show bills like this that do nothing. I have condemned the Democrats recently for doing the same thing. They are stupid and a waste of government resources. As the link previously shows, this is ALREADY illegal.
I am Pro-life and I would have voted against it for that reason.
These grandstanding efforts need to stop. They won't as long as people such as yourself will defend them.
they are sending a message to their base apparently ....They don't and as I already said and you somehow missed, I condemn them for it.
You got me though, yeah, I just wouldn't have bothered to show up for the vote and then I could explain why when asked.
Care to flesh that out?Which would have never have happened without the overturn of RvW.
With a divided congress what you get are "show bills". It's the way the House shows what they would do if only they had the Presidency and the Senate under Repubican control.
It's part of the 2024 warm ups.
they are sending a message to their base apparently ....
Democrats will always defend what they consider to be their right to deny our 1st and 2nd amendments, their right to freebies and their right to kill babies. That's why they need to be weeded out of our government. MAGA
What? Are you agreeing that bills should be focused on only one item at a time so unrelated things can't be snuck in to make it impossible to get what you vote for without stuff you don't want?Undoubtedly there were other reasons for the 'no' vote. The above was likely included in a bill the Democrats could not support for the very reason we see here, propaganda.
So what we will get is passing laws that are already the law? And you support that? Do you understand the confusion and mess this causes?
In some places the abortion rights bills allow abortion during the "peri-natal" period, which can be interpreted to mean up to a week AFTER birth, so I can see why the Republice
There is no place that allows the killing of a baby after being born. The Federal law addressing this was already posted above.
The laws were written in an ambiguous way, and any death of the fetus/infant during this period could be considered part of the abortion.
No such laws were ever passed. More political circus acts.
They were in CA and NY. The wording was included. They were in such a rush to pass "abortion up to the last second of pregnancy" laws they used the term perinatal without realizing it could mean up to a week after birth.
