2016 Republican win not in the history book

Wolfstrike

Gold Member
Jan 12, 2012
2,237
433
160
Los Angeles
The Karl Marx Socialism has been poisoning our society since the early 1900's

These people have infiltrated our government and writing modern history the way they want to read it.

It's no accident there was a black president in office for the 150th anniversary of the end of slavery.

Obama might have one the first election, but he did not win the second.

There was no way they would allow "the first black president" to be thrown out of office after one term, it wouldn't look good in the history book.

Romney was chosen because he passed the obamacare prototype in Massachusetts.

* Romney's son tried to add realism to the election by saying he wanted to punch Obama, in an age when people are dragged off by the Secret Service for making threats. No such thing happened, because they are all buddies.

* The media reported record Republican turn out in swing states and the next day Obama was named the winner.

* "Black" precincts across the nation reported 100% voted for Obama, impossible

------------

It was reported in the news that a Democrat candidate MUST win the 2016 election "to preserve Obama's legacy"

Most people ignored this statement, but people fail to understand the scope of what they are willing to do.

This means no over-turning Obamacare or any other policy Obama passed, it most likely also means waiting for the economy to improve so Obama can get the credit

Back page stories said that hospitals were dropping off patients onto the streets, this isn't big news in our age , but in the future when people question paying tremendous amounts of money for health care insurance that does little for them, this story will become prominent. Most likely a crafted conspiracy to insure extorted funds for years to come.

------------------



A few other news stories people didn't pay attention to is the fact the electoral maps of some swing states were changed to "favor Democrats", I remember Nevada, possibly Florida, and maybe other states.

It seems the Socialists have most likely changed the maps so the Republicans CAN'T win, and as usual there is very little talk in the media about it, and no complaints from the Republicans.

A few weeks ago I saw Scott Pelley on CBS say "remember, the popular vote doesn't win the election, the candidates win by electoral votes"

It seems they might be preparing the public for the idea of Trump winning by popular vote and losing by electoral votes.

Also, we haven't had to deal with a faithless elector changing an election yet, electoral voters simply not feeling like voting the way they are supposed to
 

Forum List

Back
Top