2015 hottest year ever, 15 of 16 hottest years since 2001...

[francoHFW]

Report: Global warming hurting crop production, pushing prices higher

100 bushel wheat, 25 ton sugarbeets, 350-400 sack potatoes. 30 sack beans.
Have you seen all the fat asses when ya travel around. Ya, there's a real food problem. Like to much

Shytte processed foods- cheap, unhealthy AND make you fat...

 

[HappyJoy]

Report: Global warming hurting crop production, pushing prices higher

from your link:

"The team then compiled how much corn, wheat, rice and soybeans were grown in every country in 2008. They compared those figures with projections of how much of each crop could have been grown had global temperatures not risen since 1980."
​

So it's based on bogus temperature data and "projections" (science fiction, in other words). Since when do warmer temperatures cause crop yields to go down?

Why is it bogus?

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point

You're really missing the point

The point is, crop production is dropping. Really. Because of AGW. Really.
Please ignore all the increases in production. Really.

Nobody said overall crop production is dropping. Where climate change is having the biggest impact crops are producing less than they would without the problem. The prediction is that this problem is going to continue to grow.

 

[HappyJoy]

Is there any large reputable non political agency or organizations not linked to fossil fuels who think climate change isn't happening and not related to human activity? I don't think there is. It's either conspiracy nuts, the oil industry or right wing think tanks.

 

[francoHFW]

Report: Global warming hurting crop production, pushing prices higher

from your link:

"The team then compiled how much corn, wheat, rice and soybeans were grown in every country in 2008. They compared those figures with projections of how much of each crop could have been grown had global temperatures not risen since 1980."
​

So it's based on bogus temperature data and "projections" (science fiction, in other words). Since when do warmer temperatures cause crop yields to go down?

Why is it bogus?

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point

You're really missing the point

The point is, crop production is dropping. Really. Because of AGW. Really.
Please ignore all the increases in production. Really.

Due to new species of crops duh. Enjoy your record snowstorms on the E coast and the hurricanes where they haven't been before

Thanks for the bs talking points, SEE OP, dupe Pubtroll.

 

[francoHFW]

There are other factors lol...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Such as?

Where is the evidence that global warming is harming agricultural production?

India's is due to new kind of corn. Evidence is everywhere but RW "news". OP is fact.

So crop increases year after year is evidence that global warming is harming agricultural production?

Are you really this stupid?

See links, Pubtroll- the only kind. Google it duh.

 

[jc456]

from your link:

"The team then compiled how much corn, wheat, rice and soybeans were grown in every country in 2008. They compared those figures with projections of how much of each crop could have been grown had global temperatures not risen since 1980."
​

So it's based on bogus temperature data and "projections" (science fiction, in other words). Since when do warmer temperatures cause crop yields to go down?

Why is it bogus?

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point

You're really missing the point

The point is, crop production is dropping. Really. Because of AGW. Really.
Please ignore all the increases in production. Really.

Due to new species of crops duh. Enjoy your record snowstorms on the E coast and the hurricanes where they haven't been before

Thanks for the bs talking points, SEE OP, dupe Pubtroll.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

from your link:

"The team then compiled how much corn, wheat, rice and soybeans were grown in every country in 2008. They compared those figures with projections of how much of each crop could have been grown had global temperatures not risen since 1980."
​

So it's based on bogus temperature data and "projections" (science fiction, in other words). Since when do warmer temperatures cause crop yields to go down?

Why is it bogus?

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point

You're really missing the point

The point is, crop production is dropping. Really. Because of AGW. Really.
Please ignore all the increases in production. Really.

Nobody said overall crop production is dropping. Where climate change is having the biggest impact crops are producing less than they would without the problem. The prediction is that this problem is going to continue to grow.

Production increased 10%, for instance, but without "climate change", it would have grown 12%?
It's a good thing they don't actually need proof to make claims like this.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

from your link:

"The team then compiled how much corn, wheat, rice and soybeans were grown in every country in 2008. They compared those figures with projections of how much of each crop could have been grown had global temperatures not risen since 1980."
​

So it's based on bogus temperature data and "projections" (science fiction, in other words). Since when do warmer temperatures cause crop yields to go down?

Why is it bogus?

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point

You're really missing the point

The point is, crop production is dropping. Really. Because of AGW. Really.
Please ignore all the increases in production. Really.

Due to new species of crops duh. Enjoy your record snowstorms on the E coast and the hurricanes where they haven't been before

Thanks for the bs talking points, SEE OP, dupe Pubtroll.

Due to new species of crops duh.

GMO crops are negating the impact of AGW. Hurray for human innovation.

Enjoy your record snowstorms on the E coast and the hurricanes where they haven't been before

Not to mention all the massive hurricanes that hit the US since Katrina. Durr.

 

[HappyJoy]

Why is it bogus?

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point

You're really missing the point

The point is, crop production is dropping. Really. Because of AGW. Really.
Please ignore all the increases in production. Really.

Nobody said overall crop production is dropping. Where climate change is having the biggest impact crops are producing less than they would without the problem. The prediction is that this problem is going to continue to grow.

Production increased 10%, for instance, but without "climate change", it would have grown 12%?
It's a good thing they don't actually need proof to make claims like this.

10% where? Let's talk about that.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point

You're really missing the point

The point is, crop production is dropping. Really. Because of AGW. Really.
Please ignore all the increases in production. Really.

Nobody said overall crop production is dropping. Where climate change is having the biggest impact crops are producing less than they would without the problem. The prediction is that this problem is going to continue to grow.

Production increased 10%, for instance, but without "climate change", it would have grown 12%?
It's a good thing they don't actually need proof to make claims like this.

10% where? Let's talk about that.

10% where? Let's talk about that.

You see where I said, "for instance"?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point

You're really missing the point

The point is, crop production is dropping. Really. Because of AGW. Really.
Please ignore all the increases in production. Really.

Nobody said overall crop production is dropping. Where climate change is having the biggest impact crops are producing less than they would without the problem. The prediction is that this problem is going to continue to grow.

Production increased 10%, for instance, but without "climate change", it would have grown 12%?
It's a good thing they don't actually need proof to make claims like this.

10% where? Let's talk about that.

Cool chart. 60 bushels per acre in 1960, 150 bushels per acre in 2010.
Without the damage from "climate change", we'd all be dead, drowned under an ocean of corn, eh?

 

[HappyJoy]

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point

You're really missing the point

The point is, crop production is dropping. Really. Because of AGW. Really.
Please ignore all the increases in production. Really.

Nobody said overall crop production is dropping. Where climate change is having the biggest impact crops are producing less than they would without the problem. The prediction is that this problem is going to continue to grow.

Production increased 10%, for instance, but without "climate change", it would have grown 12%?
It's a good thing they don't actually need proof to make claims like this.

10% where? Let's talk about that.

10% where? Let's talk about that.

You see where I said, "for instance"?

I absolutely see where you're saying nothing.

 

[Uncensored2008]

2015 Was Earth's Warmest Year on Record, NOAA Says

Helloooo?

And if their not, the the AGW church will adjust the past to make it so...

Scientology is FAR more scientific than the AGW cult is...

 

[HappyJoy]

2015 Was Earth's Warmest Year on Record, NOAA Says

Helloooo?

And if their not, the the AGW church will adjust the past to make it so...

Scientology is FAR more scientific than the AGW cult is...

Can you name a single reputable organization not linked to the oil industry, conspiracy theorists or right wing politics that agrees with you? Please, list them all.

 

[bripat9643]

Report: Global warming hurting crop production, pushing prices higher

from your link:

"The team then compiled how much corn, wheat, rice and soybeans were grown in every country in 2008. They compared those figures with projections of how much of each crop could have been grown had global temperatures not risen since 1980."
​

So it's based on bogus temperature data and "projections" (science fiction, in other words). Since when do warmer temperatures cause crop yields to go down?

Why is it bogus?

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point It's a complicated world and simply posting charts without any context around them isn't an argument. So, go back to wherever you got those and ask that source what crop production would look like without climate change. Otherwise your little charts aren't worth shit.

"It would have been better without global warming" is the kind of claim Obama makes about the economy. It's an absolute bullshit claim. Yeah, it's a complex world, which is why such claims are almost always bullshit.

 

[bripat9643]

The first obvious problem with your claim is that agricultural production has increased by leaps and bounds in the last several decades. India can now feed itself, and that wasn't true 20 years ago. Starvation has been drastically reduced. It only occurs now because of civil war or a communist dictatorship.

Warmer temperatures are good for agriculture. So are higher CO2 levels. I have no idea what these claims of reduced output are based on, but they aren't based on the actual levels of output.

Look at the following graphs and then explain how global warming is reducing agricultural output:

Somebody didn't read my link.

Your link is bullshit. You obviously can't read a graph that shows world crop production increases year after year after year.

This was already explained to you.

What part of my graph didn't you understand? Where is the evidence of reduced crop production in those graphs?

I fully understand your charts. Can you tell me what the source of your charts thinks about climate change?

It doesn't matter what they think. Opinions aren't a valid substitute for facts. The one fact that is beyond dispute is that crop production has increased every year for the last 60 years.

 

[bripat9643]

2015 Was Earth's Warmest Year on Record, NOAA Says

Helloooo?

And if their not, the the AGW church will adjust the past to make it so...

Scientology is FAR more scientific than the AGW cult is...

Can you name a single reputable organization not linked to the oil industry, conspiracy theorists or right wing politics that agrees with you? Please, list them all.

ROFL! You've already found a way to ignore anyone who disagrees with your cult. "linked to the oil industry" how, by putting gas in their cars? By the cult definition, anyone who disputes the AGW religion is a "conspiracy theorist."

 

[HappyJoy]

Report: Global warming hurting crop production, pushing prices higher

from your link:

"The team then compiled how much corn, wheat, rice and soybeans were grown in every country in 2008. They compared those figures with projections of how much of each crop could have been grown had global temperatures not risen since 1980."
​

So it's based on bogus temperature data and "projections" (science fiction, in other words). Since when do warmer temperatures cause crop yields to go down?

Why is it bogus?

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point It's a complicated world and simply posting charts without any context around them isn't an argument. So, go back to wherever you got those and ask that source what crop production would look like without climate change. Otherwise your little charts aren't worth shit.

"It would have been better without global warming" is the kind of claim Obama makes about the economy. It's an absolute bullshit claim. Yeah, it's a complex world, which is why such claims are almost always bullshit.

Scientists out weigh your opinion.

 

[bripat9643]

Is there any large reputable non political agency or organizations not linked to fossil fuels who think climate change isn't happening and not related to human activity? I don't think there is. It's either conspiracy nuts, the oil industry or right wing think tanks.

The appeal to authority is the favorite logical fallacy of the AGW cult.

 

[bripat9643]

from your link:

"The team then compiled how much corn, wheat, rice and soybeans were grown in every country in 2008. They compared those figures with projections of how much of each crop could have been grown had global temperatures not risen since 1980."
​

So it's based on bogus temperature data and "projections" (science fiction, in other words). Since when do warmer temperatures cause crop yields to go down?

Why is it bogus?

There is no empirical data to support the claims. It's all based on "projections" of dubious credibility. First off, the temperature records have been shown to be less than accurate or credible. Second, they are only looking at selected countries. When you look at total crop production, what do you see? You see steady increases year-by-year.

Nobody said there weren't increases in crop production. You're really missing the point It's a complicated world and simply posting charts without any context around them isn't an argument. So, go back to wherever you got those and ask that source what crop production would look like without climate change. Otherwise your little charts aren't worth shit.

"It would have been better without global warming" is the kind of claim Obama makes about the economy. It's an absolute bullshit claim. Yeah, it's a complex world, which is why such claims are almost always bullshit.

Scientists out weigh your opinion.

No they don't. The only thing that outweighs opinion is fact. You haven't produced any.