Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow.Demagogery.
If you want to prove something, be short and clear and do not try to refute the obvious.
1. I asked rupol2000 for a SOURCE or LINK for his "two Types" 40 Minutes ago and he did not answer, rather gave me a "Disagree" 'feedback' button!I'm talking about large genomic surveys, and studies upon humans as a species.
You talk about evolution and anthropology. . . as if you have any idea what these terms even mean. It is. . . quite seriously? Hilarious.
Richard Lewontin - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
View attachment 552570
Human Evolutionary Biology
Wide-ranging and inclusive, this text provides an invaluable review of an expansive selection of topics in human evolution, variation and adaptability for professionals and students in biological anthropology, evolutionary biology, medical sciences and psychology. The chapters are organized...books.google.com
Genetics and Genomics of Human
Population Structure
Wayback Machine
I did.I suggest you google "Lewontin's Fallacy" as Lewontin's work is outdated and abused.
Now, this beautiful woman keeps toned. I don’t know what’s with American men who like that big hipped, big butt look like Kim Kardashian and Co… adding butt enlargers- yiiiikes! I just don’t get it and I never will lolnot sure but it seems that among American and Latin American women, type 1 also dominates
I think it has to do with politics. These types are imposed from above by explicit and implicit propaganda. The same thing happened at one time with the fashion for blondes, even though almost all blondes do makeup for looking like brunettes.Now, this beautiful woman keeps toned. I don’t know what’s with American men who like that big hipped, big butt look like Kim Kardashian and Co… adding butt enlargers- yiiiikes! I just don’t get it and I never will lol
Lewonontin's work is based on looking at one gene locus at a timeI did.
It has been supported by more recent work. The mathematics of the genetic sequencing can't ever be. . . "outdated." Only the interpretation can be politically massaged. I find it interesting that at one point in time, it was the racial nationalists the objected, because they wanted an excuse for segregation, and now it is the woke crowd that objects because they want exclusionary politics to play a role in denial of reality.
"Edwards' criticism in turn garnered its own criticism from biologists such as Jonathan Marks, who argued that "the point of the theory of race was to discover large clusters of people that are principally homogeneous within and heterogeneous between, contrasting groups. Lewontin's analysis shows that such groups do not exist in the human species, and Edwards' critique does not contradict that interpretation."[16]"
Even Edwards ADMITS that the science was, has been, and always will be sound.
It is only "outdated," if you are a a modern day race hustler observing how folks don't give a shit about race as a social cleavage anymore.
Being that Asian chicks run left to right enhancing their broader spectrum ?And the point being..........?
not sure but it seems that among American and Latin American women, type 1 also dominates
I’m sure you’re right that there’s a bit of political influence, fine-tuned by main stream media and their “personal” projection of evolving beauty standards. A few decades ago, there would not have been a heavyset woman in a lingerie yet. Currently, most American lingerie and swimsuit companies make a better effort to represent all women. I have no problem with that at all as long as healthful goals for BMI are not replaced by “Eat as much junk food you want and you are doing great because you’re being you!” This messaging is already happening in certain media sectors.I think it has to do with politics. These types are imposed from above by explicit and implicit propaganda. The same thing happened at one time with the fashion for blondes, even though almost all blondes do makeup for looking like brunettes.
Just shut up. This is my personal classification, based on the concrete property. I did not say that this is written in the scriptures about the creation of the world in 7 daysyour OP "Two types"
If you want to make your personal classifications, on what you fancifully believe to be a "concrete property," put it in General Global topics, and don't use terms like, anthropology, and evolution, since it is clear, you don't understand the meanings of these words.Just shut up. This is my personal classification, based on the concrete property. I did not say that this is written in the scriptures about the creation of the world in 7 days
If some idiot cannot understand that a type is just a set of objects with certain characteristics, these are the problems of this idiot