What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2 anthropological types of women.

OP
R

rupol2000

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Messages
3,779
Reaction score
435
Points
63
I'm talking about large genomic surveys
Demagogery.
If you want to prove something, be short and clear and do not try to refute the obvious.
 

MisterBeale

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
35,890
Reaction score
19,789
Points
1,905
Demagogery.
If you want to prove something, be short and clear and do not try to refute the obvious.
Wow.

You can't even spell or use the word demagoguery correctly.
Complex ideas have no simple explanations.

I think we are done here.

Q.E.D.
 

abu afak

ALLAH SNACKBAR!
Joined
Mar 3, 2006
Messages
4,055
Reaction score
1,207
Points
315
I'm talking about large genomic surveys, and studies upon humans as a species.

You talk about evolution and anthropology. . . as if you have any idea what these terms even mean. It is. . . quite seriously? Hilarious.


View attachment 552570

Genetics and Genomics of Human
Population Structure
Wayback Machine
1. I asked rupol2000 for a SOURCE or LINK for his "two Types" 40 Minutes ago and he did not answer, rather gave me a "Disagree" 'feedback' button!

What the **** kind of FRAUDULENT Non-answer is that?
Do you have one or Not?

Jack***


2. MisterBeale
I suggest you google "Lewontin's Fallacy" as Lewontin's work is outdated and abused.


3. This science section is a laugh a minute even forgetting the Jesus Idiocy by James Bond allowed in it.

`
 
Last edited:
OP
R

rupol2000

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Messages
3,779
Reaction score
435
Points
63
yes, about the connection with the eastern type of woman, this is reliable. I have looked through about a thousand photos of Indian actresses and models, almost all of them are of 1 type
 

ClaireH

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2020
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
3,242
Points
1,938
Location
Midwest US
Depending which source you go with, currently there are 4 types, 12 types, or 16 types of women’s most common shapes. It’s worth a mention that preference for body type is geographically different which most already know. Even though I cringed using HP for information, because it has nothing to do with politics I trust the findings more and used it.

I’ll get slammed for this but I’m not giving you a male view, but I think the US model is not toned enough to represent optimal health.
 
OP
R

rupol2000

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Messages
3,779
Reaction score
435
Points
63
not sure but it seems that among American and Latin American women, type 1 also dominates

364full-paromita-mitra.jpg
 

MisterBeale

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
35,890
Reaction score
19,789
Points
1,905
I suggest you google "Lewontin's Fallacy" as Lewontin's work is outdated and abused.
I did.

It has been supported by more recent work. The mathematics of the genetic sequencing can't ever be. . . "outdated." Only the interpretation can be politically massaged. I find it interesting that at one point in time, it was the racial nationalists the objected, because they wanted an excuse for segregation, and now it is the woke crowd that objects because they want exclusionary politics to play a role in denial of reality.


"Edwards' criticism in turn garnered its own criticism from biologists such as Jonathan Marks, who argued that "the point of the theory of race was to discover large clusters of people that are principally homogeneous within and heterogeneous between, contrasting groups. Lewontin's analysis shows that such groups do not exist in the human species, and Edwards' critique does not contradict that interpretation."[16]"

Even Edwards ADMITS that the science was, has been, and always will be sound.


It is only "outdated," if you are a a modern day race hustler observing how folks don't give a shit about race as a social cleavage anymore.

iu
 
OP
R

rupol2000

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Messages
3,779
Reaction score
435
Points
63
Depending which source you go with
I classified according to a specific basis, according to the width of the hips relative to the pelvis.
Here specifically about the hips.
 

ClaireH

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2020
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
3,242
Points
1,938
Location
Midwest US
not sure but it seems that among American and Latin American women, type 1 also dominates

364full-paromita-mitra.jpg
Now, this beautiful woman keeps toned. I don’t know what’s with American men who like that big hipped, big butt look like Kim Kardashian and Co… adding butt enlargers- yiiiikes! I just don’t get it and I never will lol
 
OP
R

rupol2000

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Messages
3,779
Reaction score
435
Points
63
Now, this beautiful woman keeps toned. I don’t know what’s with American men who like that big hipped, big butt look like Kim Kardashian and Co… adding butt enlargers- yiiiikes! I just don’t get it and I never will lol
I think it has to do with politics. These types are imposed from above by explicit and implicit propaganda. The same thing happened at one time with the fashion for blondes, even though almost all blondes do makeup for looking like brunettes.
 

abu afak

ALLAH SNACKBAR!
Joined
Mar 3, 2006
Messages
4,055
Reaction score
1,207
Points
315
I did.

It has been supported by more recent work. The mathematics of the genetic sequencing can't ever be. . . "outdated." Only the interpretation can be politically massaged. I find it interesting that at one point in time, it was the racial nationalists the objected, because they wanted an excuse for segregation, and now it is the woke crowd that objects because they want exclusionary politics to play a role in denial of reality.


"Edwards' criticism in turn garnered its own criticism from biologists such as Jonathan Marks, who argued that "the point of the theory of race was to discover large clusters of people that are principally homogeneous within and heterogeneous between, contrasting groups. Lewontin's analysis shows that such groups do not exist in the human species, and Edwards' critique does not contradict that interpretation."[16]"

Even Edwards ADMITS that the science was, has been, and always will be sound.


It is only "outdated," if you are a a modern day race hustler observing how folks don't give a shit about race as a social cleavage anymore.

iu
Lewonontin's work is based on looking at one gene locus at a time
The vast majority of genes are junk/remnant genes, Not the ones under selective pressure that allow for easy Racial discernment.
with 3 billion genes positions you could have millions of different gene and be wildly racially different despite having 85% similar ones.
It's a non-claim.
Thus even commercial genetic tests now can easily determine your origins looking at 100-200 or less genes.


And let me repeat rupol2000 you are a FRAUD unable to document/LINK your OP "Two types" so resorted to skinny/Beauty Pageant and fat women PICTURES instead to 'prove' it. (No tweeners)
LOL
You caught/outed Idiot.
 
Last edited:

ClaireH

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2020
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
3,242
Points
1,938
Location
Midwest US
I think it has to do with politics. These types are imposed from above by explicit and implicit propaganda. The same thing happened at one time with the fashion for blondes, even though almost all blondes do makeup for looking like brunettes.
I’m sure you’re right that there’s a bit of political influence, fine-tuned by main stream media and their “personal” projection of evolving beauty standards. A few decades ago, there would not have been a heavyset woman in a lingerie yet. Currently, most American lingerie and swimsuit companies make a better effort to represent all women. I have no problem with that at all as long as healthful goals for BMI are not replaced by “Eat as much junk food you want and you are doing great because you’re being you!” This messaging is already happening in certain media sectors.

I have seen beautiful heavyset women, but they are definitely not healthy and most will not live long. Is it my business how long other adults want to live or how healthy they are or not? No, it is not. What I do consider “my business” is the message it sends to young girls about “ Look at these beautiful, overweight women that we are admiring and respecting! You too can grow up with a diet high in saturated fats and no need to exercise! Health concerns are secondary to how you feel about yourself!” Pediatricians would beg to differ.
 
OP
R

rupol2000

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Messages
3,779
Reaction score
435
Points
63
your OP "Two types"
Just shut up. This is my personal classification, based on the concrete property. I did not say that this is written in the scriptures about the creation of the world in 7 days
If some idiot cannot understand that a type is just a set of objects with certain characteristics, these are the problems of this idiot
 

MisterBeale

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
35,890
Reaction score
19,789
Points
1,905
Just shut up. This is my personal classification, based on the concrete property. I did not say that this is written in the scriptures about the creation of the world in 7 days
If some idiot cannot understand that a type is just a set of objects with certain characteristics, these are the problems of this idiot
If you want to make your personal classifications, on what you fancifully believe to be a "concrete property," put it in General Global topics, and don't use terms like, anthropology, and evolution, since it is clear, you don't understand the meanings of these words.

You are scientifically illiterate and not anywhere near qualified to discuss anything near to what would be termed as the morphology of the human being, or how it became that way.

So, yeah, if anyone needs to. . .in this sub-forum, "shut-up?" It would be YOU. abu afak and I have both been members of this forum forever, and we both rarely agree on anything, but I am pretty sure, we both agree, YOU are the farthest thing from knowing your head from a hole.

n00b.
 

ReinyDays

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
6,630
Reaction score
2,938
Points
210
Location
State of Jefferson
I'd say the OP spends too much time on pornography sites ... where only women with ideal woman's bodies, and women with ideal little girl bodies, are profitable ... the OP seems unaware that most women have average bodies, something he'll not find at the sites he visits ... thus his "only two types" theory ...

He also seems unaware that all these photographs are heavily retouched with an air brush ... these women don't actually look that good ... that's true even outside pornography, regular fashion models have their photos retouched for the presses ...

Mothers have stretch marks ... a sure sign they're participating in the evolutionary process and passing on her genes ...
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$145.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top