19/20 Democrats Who May Run for 2028 Presidential Nomination Believe Men Can Become Women

I think you did not actually see the video, did you?

By the way and as far as "giving birth", no they cannot do that but that does not mean that there GENES are not telling their brain and their body that they are not of the physical gender that they were born with.

Here is a better explanation of that, which has nothing to do with the physical sex they were born with but what the genes tell them they are:

Someone can be "what their genes tell them to be" despite their physical body's initial appearance through epigenetics, where environment modifies gene expression (like identical twins developing differently due to nutrition or stress), or through complex inheritance, where multiple genes interact with environment to shape traits like intelligence or disease susceptibility, not just single dominant/recessive genes. For example, genes might predispose someone to a certain trait (e.g., obesity risk, higher education potential), but lifestyle, environment, or even the genes they didn't inherit can significantly alter the outcome, showing the "blueprint" isn't always the final reality.

Definition of Epigenics
epi·gen·et·ics
  1. the study of changes in organisms caused by modification of gene expression rather than alteration of the genetic code itself:
    "epigenetics has transformed the way we think about genomes"
Did you see the video in post #10?
 
Like I said, you are totally ignorant and have no desire to learn and gain knowledge
LOL. YOU are the one who won't follow the science to understand the differences between a man and a woman. You remind me of a religious cult member who wants to explain the truth to me.
 
Only Rahm Emanuel will definitively state that men cannot become women and shouldn't be playing in women's sports, etc. The other 19 who may run for the democrat's nominee for president can't quite buck the official party line narrative that men can become women and play in women's sports. Apparently the very huge majority of the democrat party is unable to define what a woman is. This is what the democrat party has become.






One of them, the frontrunner Newsom thinks he has gotten away with stealing over 100 billion dollars. What a party to have this pretty boy as their frontrunner. The only thing good I have heard about him is he can keep his panties dry for longer than 8 hours. A large improvement. But he does talk to people who aren't there.
 
Only Rahm Emanuel will definitively state that men cannot become women and shouldn't be playing in women's sports, etc. The other 19 who may run for the democrat's nominee for president can't quite buck the official party line narrative that men can become women and play in women's sports. Apparently the very huge majority of the democrat party is unable to define what a woman is. This is what the democrat party has become.








Liars.
‘They don’t know what a man and woman are.
 
The one thing that bothers me the most is that people like you do not bother to do research into what they are talking about, meaning they are basically ignorant about the topic they are talking about and on top of that, biased to the nth degree.

Gender identity is not only based on what genitalia you were born with but also the genes you were born with. Those are not always the same. As such, you could have been born with testicles. but your genes say you are a woman. This is not opinion but science:

Study reveals potential biological basis for transgender

What is gender dysphoria?

  • Gender dysphoria is the distress felt by people whose sense of being male or female differs from the gender they are assigned at birth based on their sex.
  • For some people, the difference between their gender identity and physical characteristics can cause significant and persistent emotional distress. The terms ‘transgender’ or ‘gender diverse’ are often used to describe these identities.
  • Estimates of the prevalence of gender dysphoria are increasing and range from 0.1 to 1 per cent of the population.
  • People with gender dysphoria have increased rates of depression, anxiety, eating disorders, self-harm and suicide.
  • Not all people who identify as transgender or who experience gender dysphoria take steps to transition socially or physically from their birth sex to their experienced gender.
Here is a video that explains in more detail:



I am NOT surprised that it is YOU (Independent Thinker) that put up this OP, as you have shown ignorance and bias throughout all your posts here on this board. Perhaps you should change your nickname to "Nonthinker"

Oh, and by the way and talking about the "one in twenty Democrats who may run in 2028, thinking that man can become a woman, and one that thinks otherwise", you may want to consider that those 19 are intelligent and have done their research and that the one that thinks otherwise is like you.............ignorant!

and also "by the way", in the video you will see that transgender has been around for 6,000 years, meaning it is not something that just happened and that Democrats invented!

You truly make me sick. The one thing I absolutely hate is "ignorance", given that all it takes to get rid of it, is read and do research!


‘Having a mental illness doesn’t change science, dumbass.
 
Wow, another ignorant person. Not surprised.

First of all, my post was not done using AI. It was all based on studies done. Second of all, if you are accusing any of the links supplied in my post as leftist............Wrong!

The link I supplied was to Hudson.org, who is ACTUALLY a rightist biased organization

AI Overview

Hudson.org, or the {Link: Hudson Institute, is a prominent American conservative/right-of-center think tank focusing on global security, economics, and policy, known for its pro-free market, pro-defense stance, though it describes itself as non-partisan and seeks to challenge conventional thinking, while its right-leaning nature is generally recognized by external sources like Wikipedia and InfluenceWatch. They are considered ideologically aligned with conservative principles, promoting freedom, free enterprise, and American strength, with analyses in defense, tech, and culture.

So to your post, I have to hahahaha it, being pure ignorance and bias!!
Can a man get pregnant Luckyone
 
LOL. YOU are the one who won't follow the science to understand the differences between a man and a woman. You remind me of a religious cult member who wants to explain the truth to me.
One mistake that you (and others like you) are making is that what defines a man from a woman is not only their genitals and ability to give birth or not, but by their genes and their personality.

For simple example to show you what I mean, within "MALES", there are 7 different types of personality and genes, There are Alpha males that are strong and dominant while there are types that are weak and uncertain. All 7 of these MALES have balls and can impregnate a woman but their genes and their personalities are as opposite as it can get.

Also, why do some males want to be and feel the need to be fathers, while others feel the total opposite?

With transgender you have different genes and that makes you feel and act differently. You will not find any transgender females (who were born as men) as having Alpha personalities, because their genes are different and their personalities are different.

Here is another article about transgender males

What is a man? Exploring the concept of gender

Contemporary Gender

If gender is no longer viewed as a sex-linked role but as a socially constructed identity, then it is possible to have as many genders as there are people since each person sees themselves as a unique being. People who are biologically men can then define themselves as something else. While this can be an attractive option in a world that sees men as victimizers and morally inferior, it leaves young men without effective role models. Egalitarian feminists have unwittingly exacerbated the problem by equating sexual equality with sexual sameness, leaving men unable to make even one contribution to society, as men. Nathanson and Young (2012) argued that men need a collective identity that is distinctive, necessary and publicly valued.

We would like to propose that the key concept for unlocking the potential of masculinity is neither sex nor gender, but rather the self. This concept, as developed by LH Robertson in The Evolved Self (2020), holds that people may be stable or unstable, comfortable with who they are or looking for better ways to be themselves. Each person has one or more primary identities that give them a sense of who they are. Stability is achieved when many factors in the psyche work together to reinforce a central or core identity. For example, imagine a man who has fatherhood as a central plank of his identity. We can imagine that he might include such activities as provider, protector, or transmitter of cultural tradition as factors which reinforce and stabilize his identity as a father. There would be factors idiosyncratic to him which reinforce this strong plank of selfhood. He might be the one who renovates the cabin in the woods where his children spend vacations. He might be the one who takes his children fishing, or perhaps the one who has special worries about a certain child’s future. A sense of self as father could be robust through the many factors that act together to reinforce this web of associations. In an ideal case, a sense of psychological well-being and purpose in the world would extend from this identity. While “father” is a masculine identity, we are using psychological research on the self to understand it. Rather than the concept of gender, it may be that the concept of the self has better explanatory power. The self allows us to reunite the individual as a unitary whole. This holistic development of the unitary self could incorporate the male body and historical gender roles. It could respond to any need of men to make a distinctive and valued contribution to the world.
 
Only Rahm Emanuel will definitively state that men cannot become women and shouldn't be playing in women's sports, etc. The other 19 who may run for the democrat's nominee for president can't quite buck the official party line narrative that men can become women and play in women's sports. Apparently the very huge majority of the democrat party is unable to define what a woman is. This is what the democrat party has become.






Let's hope that Americans can elect a leader who does not obsess over the gender orientation of others, and attempts to impose a State demand rather than respecting medical science in the matter.
 
The one thing that bothers me the most is that people like you do not bother to do research into what they are talking about, meaning they are basically ignorant about the topic they are talking about and on top of that, biased to the nth degree.

Gender identity is not only based on what genitalia you were born with but also the genes you were born with. Those are not always the same. As such, you could have been born with testicles. but your genes say you are a woman. This is not opinion but science:

Study reveals potential biological basis for transgender

What is gender dysphoria?

  • Gender dysphoria is the distress felt by people whose sense of being male or female differs from the gender they are assigned at birth based on their sex.
  • For some people, the difference between their gender identity and physical characteristics can cause significant and persistent emotional distress. The terms ‘transgender’ or ‘gender diverse’ are often used to describe these identities.
  • Estimates of the prevalence of gender dysphoria are increasing and range from 0.1 to 1 per cent of the population.
  • People with gender dysphoria have increased rates of depression, anxiety, eating disorders, self-harm and suicide.
  • Not all people who identify as transgender or who experience gender dysphoria take steps to transition socially or physically from their birth sex to their experienced gender.
Here is a video that explains in more detail:



I am NOT surprised that it is YOU (Independent Thinker) that put up this OP, as you have shown ignorance and bias throughout all your posts here on this board. Perhaps you should change your nickname to "Nonthinker"

Oh, and by the way and talking about the "one in twenty Democrats who may run in 2028, thinking that man can become a woman, and one that thinks otherwise", you may want to consider that those 19 are intelligent and have done their research and that the one that thinks otherwise is like you.............ignorant!

and also "by the way", in the video you will see that transgender has been around for 6,000 years, meaning it is not something that just happened and that Democrats invented!

You truly make me sick. The one thing I absolutely hate is "ignorance", given that all it takes to get rid of it, is read and do research!

I hope you guys continue to think we are the "ignorant" ones here so the current conservative moment can continue to flourish under the fact of reality and win more elections. The more you push this the worse off the left is. So go identify as a penguin, a juice box, or whatever so we can enjoy the demise of the progressive movement.
 
Such ignorance (and bias) is impossible to have rational conversations with.

I am not biased or ignorant in any way, given that all my life I have dedicated it to gaining knowledge. I have done this for the following reasons

1) gaining knowledge allows you to cope with life's realities, which are often difficult and painful to experience, meaning you need to cope with them to find the solutions needed to get past them.

2) gaining knowledge allows you to gain advantage over others, given that all of us (100%) are looking for the same thing, which is to be successful in an economic, emotional, and fulfilling way. Reality is that few obtain those levels, meaning that if you know more than the others, you will beat them as far as reaching goals

3) gaining knowledge makes you an overall better person because you "truly" understand what humans are and how they think and react. It makes you understand that humans by nature are fallible and as such, it allows you to get rid of biases and allows you to have positive relationships in general.

By the way, this does NOT make me a better person than anyone else, given that we ALL have the ability to gain knowledge. The only thing needed is "desire to do so". Desire is something we all have but few truly act on it, or act on it in a positive way.

Anyhow, talking to someone that is blind-BY-CHOICE is a time waster that does not accomplish anything for either party.
 
15th post
I hope you guys continue to think we are the "ignorant" ones here so the current conservative moment can continue to flourish under the fact of reality and win more elections. The more you push this the worse off the left is. So go identify as a penguin, a juice box, or whatever so we can enjoy the demise of the progressive movement.
You are correct in one way and that is that most people like to live in their own fantasy world (do not want to face the harsh reality of life) and as such, those fantasy world live on..................until Mother Nature comes calling (at some point in time for sure). Nonetheless, in the MEANTIME they enjoy it. Most people do not plan for the future but live day-to-day.

Mothernatureweeds.webp
 
Let's hope that Americans can elect a leader who does not obsess over the gender orientation of others, and attempts to impose a State demand rather than respecting medical science in the matter.
I agree with your first part of your statement but not with the last part. I think a person's rights is a national matter and not a State matter.

I do believe though, that too much attention is given to gender issues, but then again, when one group (the Republicans) make such a negative issue of it, the other side (the Democrats) make it a big issue as well.

Only 1% of Americans are transgender and that is not enough to make it a big issue for either party. Nonetheless, what is a big issue is the not allowing a person their rights to do with their own body what they want. That is what all of us should stand for. No one should have the right to tell me what to do with my own body, as long as I am not hurting others.

This does mean though, that I agree that transgender women should not be able to compete with women, given that their bodies are not of the same making, and as such, you are hurting the women that are not transgender.
 
There's only one cure for the Democrat Party.

It has to be burned to the ground.

Destroyed.

Shamed.

Defrocked.

Embarrassed.

It no longer represents America. It represents chaos, confusion, communism, corruption.

Let's tear it down. Let it be rebuilt because we need two parties. But never let it get to this point again.

The Democrat Party is the greatest threat to this country in its history.

Burn. It. Down.

i-nmp6X5V-M.jpg
 
Thats how democrats lose the debates ask them can a man give birth or become a woman or just what is woman
Thats the killer question
At what point does a Trans dude officially become a woman?

Trans = scam

The people pushing Trans on the mentally ill are pure evil.

Democrats = perverted freaks
 
Back
Top Bottom