After several weeks of radio silence, President Trump will be appearing on several shows tonight.
He was obviously waiting for the Show Trial to den.
Times included in link.
After several weeks of radio silence, President Trump will be appearing on several shows tonight.
He was obviously waiting for the Show Trial to den.
Times included in link.
After several weeks of radio silence, President Trump will be appearing on several shows tonight.
He was obviously waiting for the Show Trial to den.
Times included in link.
Yep, they tried him for what he did as president. If an employee embezzles money and then quits can that former employee be prosecuted for what they did while they worked at their former employers?
Yep, they tried him for what he did as president. If an employee embezzles money and then quits can that former employee be prosecuted for what they did while they worked at their former employers?
I will try to explain the difference here. The constitution gives the Senate the power to try a sitting president, with the Cheif Justice of the Supreme Court presiding. In the example you cited, the former employee is still bound by criminal legal code.
Now. . . once the agent of the government is no longer an agent of the government, he or she is no longer subject to be convicted of impeachment by the Senate. Could they, perhaps be indicted per criminal or civil codes?
Lots and lots of ways to prosecute if there is any REAL evidence.
Legal standing was one of the things Trump and his legal team had a hard time with in all those states he wanted to challenge the vote on. In some cases he had none.
He wasn't a voter that could prove harm. The only Federal legislation that applies to states is the voting rights act.
. . . and reform on that wasn't due till AFTER the election, which, might be some of the reason the SCOTUS wanted to stay out of this mess.
The U.S. Supreme Court will take up a case that could further weaken the landmark Voting Rights Act, agreeing to rule after the election on two Arizona voting policies, including its criminal ban on what critics call “ballot harvesting.”
web.archive.org
But please, let's get one thing straight, I'm not partisan, I'm only interested in the law, and what language dictates as truth.
I will not be gas-lit by billionaire owned corporate media. Do your own research and your own thinking.
Everything else is bullshit.
You aren't being truthful, but are parroting shit you saw on TEE VEE, or read from the CFR media.
nationalfile.com
