$15 minimum wage would destroy 1.4 Million jobs

[danielpalos]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no general warfare clause only a general welfare clause. Solving for simple poverty in our republic promotes the general welfare for our economy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Derp!

 

[basquebromance]

 

[dudmuck]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

$75 billion? That would be a massive reduction.

And what does that have to do with daniel's moronic idea for bum checks?

 

[danielpalos]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

Capitalism, what is That sayeth right-wingers when not in socialism threads proclaiming free-market Capitalism is the way to go.

 

[danielpalos]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

$75 billion? That would be a massive reduction.

And what does that have to do with daniel's moronic idea for bum checks?

A simple and market friendly solution to simple poverty via capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

$75 billion? That would be a massive reduction.

And what does that have to do with daniel's moronic idea for bum checks?

A simple and market friendly solution to simple poverty via capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Bum checks aren't market friendly, you idiot!
Get a job.

 

[danielpalos]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

$75 billion? That would be a massive reduction.

And what does that have to do with daniel's moronic idea for bum checks?

A simple and market friendly solution to simple poverty via capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Bum checks aren't market friendly, you idiot!
Get a job.

Proof, right wingers really don't care about being legal to the law as long as they can practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God), upon the less fortunate.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

$75 billion? That would be a massive reduction.

And what does that have to do with daniel's moronic idea for bum checks?

A simple and market friendly solution to simple poverty via capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Bum checks aren't market friendly, you idiot!
Get a job.

Proof, right wingers really don't care about being legal to the law as long as they can practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God), upon the less fortunate.

Blah, blah, blah.....no bum checks.

 

[danielpalos]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

$75 billion? That would be a massive reduction.

And what does that have to do with daniel's moronic idea for bum checks?

A simple and market friendly solution to simple poverty via capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Bum checks aren't market friendly, you idiot!
Get a job.

Proof, right wingers really don't care about being legal to the law as long as they can practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God), upon the less fortunate.

Blah, blah, blah.....no bum checks.

Blah, blah, blah....no market friendly solutions from the right wing; how usual and customary for them.

 

[dudmuck]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

$75 billion? That would be a massive reduction.

And what does that have to do with daniel's moronic idea for bum checks?

A simple and market friendly solution to simple poverty via capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Bum checks aren't market friendly, you idiot!
Get a job.

Proof, right wingers really don't care about being legal to the law as long as they can practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God), upon the less fortunate.

Blah, blah, blah.....no bum checks.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

$75 billion? That would be a massive reduction.

And what does that have to do with daniel's moronic idea for bum checks?

A simple and market friendly solution to simple poverty via capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Bum checks aren't market friendly, you idiot!
Get a job.

Proof, right wingers really don't care about being legal to the law as long as they can practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God), upon the less fortunate.

Blah, blah, blah.....no bum checks.

You're free to send daniel an "unemployment" check for never working.
He thinks that would be "free market".

He'll spend it on weed.

 

[danielpalos]

If it weren't for fallacy, right-wingers would have no arguments at all.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off. We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Right wingers are simply Wrong even though they are on the right wing. Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy. It cannot be Bad, only Good for the general welfare.

Y'all can't explain how we would be worse off.

Incentivizing sloth will result in more sloth. That's worse.

We could be lowering our direct tax burden in a market friendly manner.

Bum checks would increase our tax burden while lowering GDP.

Unemployment compensation is an automatic stabilizer for our economy.

Bum checks would not be a stabilizer.

It cannot be Bad,

It is. You're wrong. Again.

$75 billion? That would be a massive reduction.

And what does that have to do with daniel's moronic idea for bum checks?

A simple and market friendly solution to simple poverty via capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Bum checks aren't market friendly, you idiot!
Get a job.

Proof, right wingers really don't care about being legal to the law as long as they can practice the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God), upon the less fortunate.

Blah, blah, blah.....no bum checks.

You're free to send daniel an "unemployment" check for never working.
He thinks that would be "free market".

He'll spend it on weed.

Local businesses will appreciate that money circulating.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Local businesses will appreciate that money circulating.

They'd appreciate it more if you got a job.

No bum checks for you!

 

[danielpalos]

Local businesses will appreciate that money circulating.

They'd appreciate it more if you got a job.

No bum checks for you!

There is no guarantee of a job even in Right to Work States.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Local businesses will appreciate that money circulating.

They'd appreciate it more if you got a job.

No bum checks for you!

There is no guarantee of a job even in Right to Work States.

Especially if you're a bum.

 

[danielpalos]

Local businesses will appreciate that money circulating.

They'd appreciate it more if you got a job.

No bum checks for you!

There is no guarantee of a job even in Right to Work States.

Especially if you're a bum.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

This is an entitlement issue not a discretionary issue like your alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.