15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

[scruffy]

I don't know everything. Never claimed I did. I know what I know. And I know the human mind is the most complex thing in the universe that we know of. Good luck replicating the biological machinery of life.

Thank you. So far so good.

 

[scruffy]

What makes you think a human can perform a floating decimal point operation in a single second? ... 1 FLOP? ...

328.67351 x 47298.25 =

The Vax Frontier installed at Oakridge runs at 2.5 ExaFLOPs ... but just one of the overhead LED light bulbs is 20 W ... God bless TVA ...

One mole of sugar produces 2.8 x 10^6 joules of energy ... about a half a cup ... guessing three hours to digest ... 260 W ... that's whole body, arguably required for brain function ... but just the brain using the ratio of mass ... ha ha ha ... vanishingly small 'round here ... but seriously, the brain's about a pound ... so one or two watts is all ...

We put a 20 watt incandescent light bulb under our rigs, in winter, in Iowa, to keep the engine warm and easier to start and repair when temperatures are -25ºF ... put that in our brain case and we'll be cookin' four shore ...

Brains don't do flops. They don't work that way. It's a ridiculous comparison.

Why do you think kids have to study multiplication tables for weeks, even months?

When a digital computer can do it in microseconds?

 

[ding]

Brains don't do flops. They don't work that way. It's a ridiculous comparison.

Why do you think kids have to study multiplication tables for weeks, even months?

When a digital computer can do it in microseconds?

It's not a ridiculous comparison. How many exaFlops would a computer take to replace a human brain and run a human body?

What is ridiculous is that you idiots are so flippantly dismissing the most complex thing we know of in the universe. It's idiotic and you should be embarrassed for it.

 

[ding]

Why do you think kids have to study multiplication tables for weeks, even months?

When a digital computer can do it in microseconds?

Do you know how many computations a super computer would need to make just for human sight?

I recall reading that human eyesight is constantly comparing colors to filter out background light to see true color which required something like a billion calculations per second. Do you know why eyesight evolved this way? Seeing true color in different lights? Wouldn't want to eat the wrong colored berry.

 

[ReinyDays]

Brains don't do flops. They don't work that way. It's a ridiculous comparison.

Why do you think kids have to study multiplication tables for weeks, even months?

When a digital computer can do it in microseconds?

I understand ... that problem would take you an hour to work out, your brain can't do floating point operations ... ha ha ha ... there's 56 integer multiplication operations and about 100 integer addition operations ... then counting out the decimal places ...

I can look at it and say ≈ 15 million ... or 500 milliseconds with a slide rule ...

If we continue to move towards wind and solar energy ... we'll need to do our arithmetic with pencil and paper ... you young puppies today don't even know what a pencil is anymore ... silly gooses ...

 

[ReinyDays]

It's not a ridiculous comparison. How many exaFlops would a computer take to replace a human brain and run a human body?

What is ridiculous is that you idiots are so flippantly dismissing the most complex thing we know of in the universe. It's idiotic and you should be embarrassed for it.

Birds fly ... and look how small their brains are ... better than our rodent brain ... plants can make their own food, without a stupid brain ...

A digital electronic device isn't able to run a 44-odd amino-acid organism ... and 44-odd amino-acid organism isn't able to manage checking account balances for the FED ...

I don't think the comparison is ridiculous ... I just don't think biology makes many floating point operations ... we use proteins and lipids and hormones ... love songs written in the letters A G T and C ...

Besides ... if brains were better than chips ... why are chess computers beating the crap out of humans? ... ha ha ... 1) P-K4 to you ...

 

[scruffy]

It's not a ridiculous comparison. How many exaFlops would a computer take to replace a human brain and run a human body?

What is ridiculous is that you idiots are so flippantly dismissing the most complex thing we know of in the universe. It's idiotic and you should be embarrassed for it.

You're being a fool.

How long does it take a child to learn how to add 2+2?

And how long does it take a tiny little Arduino to add 2+2?

Stop being an idiot. The more you talk the dumber you sound.

 

[scruffy]

What is ridiculous is that you idiots are so flippantly dismissing the most complex thing we know of in the universe. It's idiotic and you should be embarrassed for it.

I study it. You make unwarranted and asinine generalizations about it. Exaflops, indeed. LMAO.

Babies babble. Do you know why they babble? Because that is how they learn. When ChatGPT babbles we call it a bug and pull the plug.

You should study optical neural networks. They use single photons as qubits. 30 qubits is approximately equivalent to a teraflop. You could fit all of ChatGPT4, about 4 exaflops, in a grain of sand, with qubits to spare.

Optical memristors fall into the category of photonics. The two most promising subcategories are optomechanics and magnetooptics. Optomechanics is attractive because of the interface to musculature and the ease of doing real physical work.

 

[ding]

I study it. You make unwarranted and asinine generalizations about it. Exaflops, indeed. LMAO.

Babies babble. Do you know why they babble? Because that is how they learn. When ChatGPT babbles we call it a bug and pull the plug.

You should study optical neural networks. They use single photons as qubits. 30 qubits is approximately equivalent to a teraflop. You could fit all of ChatGPT4, about 4 exaflops, in a grain of sand, with qubits to spare.

Optical memristors fall into the category of photonics. The two most promising subcategories are optomechanics and magnetooptics. Optomechanics is attractive because of the interface to musculature and the ease of doing real physical work.

Says the guy who believes rocks are alive.

 

[ding]

The more you talk the dumber you sound.

Is it possible to be dumber than a guy who believes rocks are alive?

 

[scruffy]

Is it possible to be dumber than a guy who believes rocks are alive?

You tell me. You're the expert, Mr. Exaflops.

 

[ding]

You tell me. You're the expert, Mr. Exaflops.

The answer is, no, it's not possible to be dumber than a guy who believes rocks are alive.

 

[scruffy]

The answer is, no, it's not possible to be dumber than a guy who believes rocks are alive.

Whatever you say.

I don't worry about trolls like you.

Your opinions don't matter.

Guys like me get stuff done, guys like you spend all your time telling us it can't be done.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Whatever you say.

I don't worry about trolls like you.

Your opinions don't matter.

Guys like me get stuff done, guys like you spend all your time telling us it can't be done.

Then get this done, share a source/link showing that someone else besides you believes that chaos is random!

 

[ding]

Whatever you say.

I don't worry about trolls like you.

Your opinions don't matter.

Guys like me get stuff done, guys like you spend all your time telling us it can't be done.

I was a practicing engineer for over 38 years, I got a lot of stuff done. And never once did I confuse living things with inanimate objects.

 

[scruffy]

Then get this done, share a source/link showing that someone else besides you believes that chaos is random!

You have piss poor reading comprehension.

Cut the crap.

PREDICT THE OUTCOME or shut up and go away.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You have piss poor reading comprehension.

Cut the crap.

PREDICT THE OUTCOME or shut up and go away.

I predict you'll continue to procrastinate because you can find no sources across the entire web who say "chaos is random" other than the odd nutjob dignbats perhaps like perpetual motion and extra terrestrial kidnapping sites.

 

[ding]

You have piss poor reading comprehension.

Cut the crap.

PREDICT THE OUTCOME or shut up and go away.

Is chaos random?

 

[scruffy]

Is chaos random?

Shut up, you little troll.

PREDICT THE FUCKING OUTCOME and stop wasting our time.

Trolls like you should be banned from science forums.

 

[ding]

Shut up, you little troll.

PREDICT THE FUCKING OUTCOME and stop wasting our time.

Trolls like you should be banned from science forums.

Because I asked you if chaos is random?