14% of Economist Say Trump Would Be The Best For The Economy

[Al Azar]

Trump's tax plan will add $10 trillion to the debt. I guess he doesn't think a $20 trillion debt is enough.

Trump bleevs he can deal with the federal debt the same way he dealt with his bankrupt casinos.

And if that doesn't work, Trump's Plan B for the federal debt is to print more money.

These reasons are why Trump scares the shit out of any economist with more than two brain cells.

Don't forget that he'll drive us into recession and cost the economy 10 million jobs.

but that's a minor thing

A more precise forecast is that he'll destroy four million jobs and prevent the creation three million more.

 

[ogibillm]

Trump's tax plan will add $10 trillion to the debt. I guess he doesn't think a $20 trillion debt is enough.

Trump bleevs he can deal with the federal debt the same way he dealt with his bankrupt casinos.

And if that doesn't work, Trump's Plan B for the federal debt is to print more money.

These reasons are why Trump scares the shit out of any economist with more than two brain cells.

Don't forget that he'll drive us into recession and cost the economy 10 million jobs.

but that's a minor thing

A more precise forecast is that he'll destroy four million jobs and prevent the creation three million more.

i saw lose 3.5 million and prevent 6+

but it's been a few days, i may be mistaken. moody's analytics?

 

[nat4900]

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

 

[Al Azar]

14% of Economist Say Trump Would Be The Best For The Economy

With GOP spin: A MASSIVE 14% of Economists say Trump would be the best for the economy.

really does make you wonder who those 14% were

They work at the Heritage Foundation, American Enterprise Institute, Hoover Institution, Lugwig von Mises Institute and the other conservative beehives that have a symbiotic relationship with conservative economists. These are the only kind of economists these places hire, and these are the only places these economists can get jobs.

 

[Al Azar]

Trump's tax plan will add $10 trillion to the debt. I guess he doesn't think a $20 trillion debt is enough.

Trump bleevs he can deal with the federal debt the same way he dealt with his bankrupt casinos.

And if that doesn't work, Trump's Plan B for the federal debt is to print more money.

These reasons are why Trump scares the shit out of any economist with more than two brain cells.

Don't forget that he'll drive us into recession and cost the economy 10 million jobs.

but that's a minor thing

A more precise forecast is that he'll destroy four million jobs and prevent the creation three million more.

i saw lose 3.5 million and prevent 6+

but it's been a few days, i may be mistaken. moody's analytics?

Sounds right. My numbers are weeks old.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Trump's tax plan will add $10 trillion to the debt. I guess he doesn't think a $20 trillion debt is enough.

Trump bleevs he can deal with the federal debt the same way he dealt with his bankrupt casinos.

And if that doesn't work, Trump's Plan B for the federal debt is to print more money.

These reasons are why Trump scares the shit out of any economist with more than two brain cells.

I still want to know what difference it makes to liberals?


Jesus if he builds a wall at least we can see it like the Hoover dam

The Hoover dam had empirical economic benefits. It's too bad Trump's wall will never be built, because I would enjoy laughing my ass off when it proved to have ZERO economic impact.

You poor deranged rubes have bought a fairy tale the economy is sluggish "because Mexicans".

The facts, economics and basic laws of supply and demand don't back up your false opinion.

Once upon a time trades like commercial electrician, dry Waller and all the rest of basic construction jobs paid a "living wage" with full benefits before the taco invasion of the 80s.

We had full employment in 2007, with the same amount (if not more) of illegals in this country.

That is a FACT.


And then something happened. Maybe you heard about it. It was in all the papers.

The economy crashed. Badly. YUUUGE crash. Banks imploded all over the world. Panic. Millions upon millions upon millions thrown out of work. Trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars lost. Is any of this ringing a bell in that foggy head of yours?

And guess what? It had NOTHING to do with Mexicans.

In fact, you would be hard pressed to find a Mexican at a desk at Goldman Sachs or Lehman Brothers or Allied Irish Bank or Landsbanki.

It's amazing how you idiot ***** forgot all about that and decided all this has something to do with Mexicans! Positively amazing you fell for that line! Seriously. It's like you have memories like that of a goldfish!

Our economy is also sluggish because of the federal debt. Again, nothing to do with Mexicans, and EVERYTHING to do with YOU!

Yes, you.

That is the thing which annoys me most. You idiot ***** will do ANYTHING to avoid looking in the mirror to find the culprit. You'll even blame Mexicans, for ****'s sake. And you like to blame the opposite party, when the truth is it is both parties doing OUR bidding which got us all in this mess.

Unbelievable.

Changing the goal posts and want to deflect? What's the point of having full unemployment in 2007 if my example of a commercial electrician is making $10 bucks an hour?

What's the point of having 4,9% UE in 2016 when like 6 million jobs are part time?

I know the construction industry almost as well as manufacturing.


Again before the taco invasion of the 80s a basic skill like commercial electrician paid a "living wage" with benefits..


What's so hard for you to comprehend?

If you only have 5 electricians in your town they will have higher wages then your town with a thousand electricians


God Damn you are stupid

So genius explain this to me, why did a few years ago some McDonald's and walmarts in the Dakota's was hiring workers at $17~$18 bucks an hour?


Take your time to try to explain away supply and demand....I will wait.





.

 

[Wyatt earp]

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

UE when


As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

Funny the Unemploment rate in November 2008 when Obama won was. 6% the following year it was over 8%

 

[Al Azar]

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

UE when


As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

Funny the Unemploment rate in November 2008 when Obama won was. 6% the following year it was over 8%

What's it now?

 

[Wyatt earp]

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

UE when


As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

Funny the Unemploment rate in November 2008 when Obama won was. 6% the following year it was over 8%

What's it now?

Got to add in the unheard of in 30 years of the part time workers don't ya?

 

[Al Azar]

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

UE when


As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

Funny the Unemploment rate in November 2008 when Obama won was. 6% the following year it was over 8%

What's it now?

Got to add in the unheard of in 30 years of the part time workers don't ya?

You said it was 8% in '09. Seven years later it's 4.8%, or in economic terms, full employment. How did the method of assessing this change?

 

[Wyatt earp]

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

UE when


As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

Funny the Unemploment rate in November 2008 when Obama won was. 6% the following year it was over 8%

What's it now?

Got to add in the unheard of in 30 years of the part time workers don't ya?

So riddle me this who caused that one Bush Jr?

Or

Obama with the New obama care rules?


Again from the feds


Fed chief concerned about the number of Americans working part-time

deral Reserve Chair Janet Yellenhas a stubborn warning light blinking on her labor market dashboard: A group of Americans larger than Washington state's population can find only part-time work.

As Yellen heads to this week's Fed symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyo., where the focus will be on the labor market, those 7.5 million part-time workers who want full-time jobs are inflating the broad measure of underemployment

 

[Al Azar]

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

UE when


As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

Funny the Unemploment rate in November 2008 when Obama won was. 6% the following year it was over 8%

What's it now?

Got to add in the unheard of in 30 years of the part time workers don't ya?

So riddle me this who caused that one Bush Jr?

Or

Obama with the New obama care rules?


Again from the feds


Fed chief concerned about the number of Americans working part-time

deral Reserve Chair Janet Yellenhas a stubborn warning light blinking on her labor market dashboard: A group of Americans larger than Washington state's population can find only part-time work.

As Yellen heads to this week's Fed symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyo., where the focus will be on the labor market, those 7.5 million part-time workers who want full-time jobs are inflating the broad measure of underemployment

Exactly. The part-time workers are "inflating the broad measure of underemployment", not inflating the measure of employment.

 

[nat4900]

Funny the Unemploment rate in November 2008 when Obama won was. 6% the following year it was over 8%

Ahhh, an arithmetic, cause-n-effect and calendar challenged right winger, I see.

 

[Wyatt earp]

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

UE when


As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

As surely they did with GWB, correct?.....unfortunately, these same businesses were turning workers to unemployment at the tune of 700,000 PER MONTH.......

Funny the Unemploment rate in November 2008 when Obama won was. 6% the following year it was over 8%

What's it now?

Got to add in the unheard of in 30 years of the part time workers don't ya?

You said it was 8% in '09. Seven years later it's 4.8%, or in economic terms, full employment. How did the method of assessing this change?

Don't follow your question?

The entire theme of my argument with G is he can't comprehend supply and demand..

With the 4.9 % they didn't change counting methods, the number of people on part time jobs exploded under obama~ directly his fault with obama care

The temporary jobs/ under paid jobs have been happening way before obama.

I won't even get into the 95 million people not working because that is a stupid argument by cons.and don't even make sense to complain about or use in a debate.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Funny the Unemploment rate in November 2008 when Obama won was. 6% the following year it was over 8%

Ahhh, an arithmetic, cause-n-effect and calendar challenged right winger, I see.

I know math tard, that's why I vote my pocket book and always republican

Just using your dumb ass propaganda against you.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Trump's tax plan will add $10 trillion to the debt. I guess he doesn't think a $20 trillion debt is enough.

Trump bleevs he can deal with the federal debt the same way he dealt with his bankrupt casinos.

And if that doesn't work, Trump's Plan B for the federal debt is to print more money.

These reasons are why Trump scares the shit out of any economist with more than two brain cells.

I still want to know what difference it makes to liberals?


Jesus if he builds a wall at least we can see it like the Hoover dam

The Hoover dam had empirical economic benefits. It's too bad Trump's wall will never be built, because I would enjoy laughing my ass off when it proved to have ZERO economic impact.

You poor deranged rubes have bought a fairy tale the economy is sluggish "because Mexicans".

The facts, economics and basic laws of supply and demand don't back up your false opinion.

Once upon a time trades like commercial electrician, dry Waller and all the rest of basic construction jobs paid a "living wage" with full benefits before the taco invasion of the 80s.

This is a living wage where I live, Mexicans and all:

https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/International-Brotherhood-of-Electrical-Workers-Salaries-E31245.htm

Union...

Remind me again how many union workers are in the states today?

Remind me again the situation with Detroit?

 

[TheOldSchool]

14%? That's one of the best numbers numbers Trump's had in months!

 

[bripat9643]

"A policy survey of National Association for Business Economics (NABE) members released Monday shows that 55% of business economists feel that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would do the best job as president of managing the U.S. economy. The candidate with the next-largest percentage of the vote was Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson: 15% of NABE members said he’d do the best job managing the economy. Another 15% or respondents said they didn’t know who would be best or that they didn’t have an opinion.
Just 14% chose Donald Trump.
The survey results are remarkable because NABE members aren’t your average ivory tower-dwelling, left-leaning egg heads. They work for businesses, trade associations and government agencies across the country. As NABE director and survey chair LaVaughn Henry put it, these are people who have skin in the game.
“You’re speaking of people who advise business leaders on day-to-day and long term issues where the outcome has to be one way or the other, it can’t just be, ‘let’s study it or research it forever,’” he told FORBES in a recent interview. “These are people who are actually helping to make decisions of do we produce here, or do we produce oversees; do we consume more, consume less.”
By 4 to 1 margin, business economists say Clinton would manage economy better than Trump
America's business economist have spoken, Donald Trump wouldn't make America great. I know I am surprised, based on Trump's history.

Economists who work for the government are obviously going to be leftists. The same goes for the ones who work for trade associations. They definitely favor these rotten trade deals that sell out American workers. Even a large share of the ones who work for private business who were indoctrinated by economists on the government payroll.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Sure, like what gwb did with his administration and terms. Look what happened. Another brain-dead teabagging donald gobbler!

"A policy survey of National Association for Business Economics (NABE) members released Monday shows that 55% of business economists feel that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would do the best job as president of managing the U.S. economy. The candidate with the next-largest percentage of the vote was Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson: 15% of NABE members said he’d do the best job managing the economy. Another 15% or respondents said they didn’t know who would be best or that they didn’t have an opinion.
Just 14% chose Donald Trump.
The survey results are remarkable because NABE members aren’t your average ivory tower-dwelling, left-leaning egg heads. They work for businesses, trade associations and government agencies across the country. As NABE director and survey chair LaVaughn Henry put it, these are people who have skin in the game.
“You’re speaking of people who advise business leaders on day-to-day and long term issues where the outcome has to be one way or the other, it can’t just be, ‘let’s study it or research it forever,’” he told FORBES in a recent interview. “These are people who are actually helping to make decisions of do we produce here, or do we produce oversees; do we consume more, consume less.”
By 4 to 1 margin, business economists say Clinton would manage economy better than Trump
America's business economist have spoken, Donald Trump wouldn't make America great. I know I am surprised, based on Trump's history.

Real simple even a brain dead liberal can comprehend this


People want to invest with a business friendly republican president

Not so much with a anti business liberal progressive blow hard president.

Still think people want to invest with a liberal president in these times and ages do ya?

Another one who ignores the history of the U.S. and world.

Facts really bother liberals don't it?

Trillions and trillions hidden off shore...obama begged and cried for that money to come home.

They said no way.

That's why we have smart CEOs , the dumb ones who invest in a liberal president either is buying them like hillary or become EX CEOs who want to invest in a joke of an economy

 

[Al Azar]

Trump's tax plan will add $10 trillion to the debt. I guess he doesn't think a $20 trillion debt is enough.

Trump bleevs he can deal with the federal debt the same way he dealt with his bankrupt casinos.

And if that doesn't work, Trump's Plan B for the federal debt is to print more money.

These reasons are why Trump scares the shit out of any economist with more than two brain cells.

I still want to know what difference it makes to liberals?


Jesus if he builds a wall at least we can see it like the Hoover dam

The Hoover dam had empirical economic benefits. It's too bad Trump's wall will never be built, because I would enjoy laughing my ass off when it proved to have ZERO economic impact.

You poor deranged rubes have bought a fairy tale the economy is sluggish "because Mexicans".

The facts, economics and basic laws of supply and demand don't back up your false opinion.

Once upon a time trades like commercial electrician, dry Waller and all the rest of basic construction jobs paid a "living wage" with full benefits before the taco invasion of the 80s.

This is a living wage where I live, Mexicans and all:

https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/International-Brotherhood-of-Electrical-Workers-Salaries-E31245.htm

Union...

Remind me again how many union workers are in the states today?

Remind me again the situation with Detroit?

Workers themselves are partially responsible for the dearth of union workers today, for getting complacent and turning their backs on their only advocate in the workplace. Anti-labor legislation accounts for the rest, which includes IMO the legislated minimum wage.

But in a way it's good for those who do enjoy union representation. The more people who are willing to work for less, the more there is to pay the union members, supervisors and managers.

Cada loco con su tema.