13-year-old arrested during protest at Central Florida Starbucks, deputies say

[Marener]

Correct.

Then why do conservatives think they have a right to post on social media websites? even going so far as to write laws to force these websites to do so?

 

[DukeU]

Then why do conservatives think they have a right to post on social media websites? even going so far as to write laws to force these websites to do so?

You would have to ask them.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Not if you are violent.

It's not peaceful if it's violent, duh.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Ever since Disney brought in all that filthy Yankee shit Orange County (Orlando) has been run by bat shit crazy Democrats and we all know that Democrats hate the Constitution.

Actually it's racist trash like you that's hates the Constitution, your dumbass, racist posts prove that everyday.

 

[Marener]

You would have to ask them.

I have. They claim it’s different because they’re the ones being “discriminated” against.

The constitution suddenly doesn’t apply when it’s used against them.

 

[Moonglow]

13-year-old arrested during protest at Central Florida Starbucks, deputies say

A 13-year-old boy was arrested after he allegedly battered a deputy during a protest at a Starbucks in Orange County, Florida, on Friday, according to the Orange County Sheriff's Office.

www.fox35orlando.com

uh how is starbucks hurting animals? well they arrested the protestors including a 13 year old. bad parentnig.

Bad parenting is correct he should have shot the cop.

 

[DukeU]

I have. They claim it’s different because they’re the ones being “discriminated” against.

The constitution suddenly doesn’t apply when it’s used against them.

Two totally different scenarios, I would agree with that.

I thought we were discussing protests? No?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Don't you have a right under the Constitution of peaceful protest?

This is just my take on it, but I think the original intent of the right to peaceably assemble, and petition your government was intended to allow people to make requests of your government, not stand outside a business and cause a commotion.

If Starbucks isn’t doing anything illegal, then “your” views on their treatment of animals is irrelevant and you can go “protest” somewhere else where “you” are not interfering with their business.

They probably don’t care about “your” movement and “you” don’t have a right to try and intimidate them into action.

Just my $.02

 

[Marener]

Two totally different scenarios, I would agree with that.

I thought we were discussing protests? No?

Protests are speech.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

This is just my take on it, but I think the original intent of the right to peaceably assemble, and petition your government was intended to allow people to make requests of your government, not stand outside a business and cause a commotion.

If Starbucks isn’t doing anything illegal, then “your” views on their treatment of animals is irrelevant and you can go “protest” somewhere else where “you” are not interfering with their business.

They probably don’t care about “your” movement and “you” don’t have a right to try and intimidate them into action.

Just my $.02

Would you consider the lunch counter sit ins during the Civil Rights Movement irrelevant?

 

[DukeU]

Protests are speech.

And we have a right to both under certain circumstances, but not all.

 

[Marener]

And we have a right to both under certain circumstances, but not all.

First amendment does not apply to private property.

 

[DukeU]

First amendment does not apply to private property.

And we have a right to both under certain circumstances, but not all.

 

[Flash]

They were peacefully protesting.

Like the father of the dead Marine that called out Potatohead's incompetence in the SOTU address?

He was arrested.

Or was that "different"?

 

[Marener]

And we have a right to both under certain circumstances, but not all.

What circumstances do we have first amendment rights on private property?

 

[Marener]

Like the father of the dead Marine that called out Potatohead's incompetence in the SOTU address?

He was arrested.

Or was that "different"?

Ask Mike Johnson R-Louisiana, because that’s who arrested the father of the dead marine.

 

[DukeU]

What circumstances do we have first amendment rights on private property?

Never claimed we did on private property.

 

[Flash]

Ask Mike Johnson R-Louisiana, because that’s who arrested the father of the dead marine.

I saw him sitting behind the podium the whole time. He didn't arrest anybody. It is Potatohead's Justice Department that brings charges.

In a Leftest Banana Republic you are not allowed to criticize the rulers.

 

[Marener]

I saw him sitting behind the podium the whole time. He didn't arrest anybody.

Of course not. He has his Capitol Police do it. After all, they do the speaker’s bidding, right?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Would you consider the lunch counter sit ins during the Civil Rights Movement irrelevant?

I think the original intent of the cotus was for petition to the government, as I stated.

The lunch counter sit ins were not what the first ammendment was about, in regards to protests. Was the message of the people who did the sit ins right? Absolutely, but still not what the cotus original intent was about.

Also, a sit in because your civil rights were being trampled on is a far cry from someone being triggered because they have to pay a higher price for vegan milk…