11 billion tons of ice melted in Greenland — in just one day

Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay lets try this theory as Global Warming is just a theory also.

I love when science deniers display their abject ignorance by failing to understand the difference between a theory and a hypothesis.
I love when a science moron tries to debate me about science when they cant even tell the difference between a man and a woman. Go back to school get a real education, then come back and see if you can compete with my intellect.


In general English, a theory is a hypothesis.
But in science, the word "theory" means "explanation".
For example, when Newton wrote the "Theory of Gavity", it was not at all a theory.
I was proven fact.

{...
While the law lets us calculate quite a bit about what happens, notice that it does not tell us anything about WHY it happens. That is what theories are for. In the language of science, a theory is an explanation of why and how things happen. For gravity, we use Einstein's Theory of General Relativity to explain why things fall.

A theory starts as one or more hypotheses, untested ideas about why something happens. For example, I might propose a hypothesis that the object that you released fell because it was pulled by the Earth's magnetic field. Once we started testing, it would not take long to find out that my hypothesis was not supported by the evidence. Non-magnetic objects fall at the same rate as magnetic objects. Because it was not supported by the evidence, my hypothesis does not gain the status of being a theory. To become a scientific theory, an idea must be thoroughly tested, and must be an accurate and predictive description of the natural world.

While laws rarely change, theories change frequently as new evidence is discovered. Instead of being discarded because of new evidence, theories are often revised to include the new evidence in their explanation. The Theory of General Relativity has adapted as new technologies and new evidence have expanded our view of the universe.

So when we are scientifically discussing gravity, we can talk about the law of gravity that describes the attraction between two objects, and we can also talk about the theory of gravity that describes why the objects attract each other.
...}
Is Gravity a Theory or a Law? | The Happy Scientist
 
Taxpayer funded PBS becomes an agent for foreign propaganda while they unjustly accuse President Trump. No surprise here.
 
Greenland lost 11 billion tons of ice in one day. How does that melt compare to the past?

Scientists announced Thursday that July equaled, if not surpassed, the hottest month in recorded history. But that was not the only cause for concern.

Greenland's ice sheet melted at its most rapid rate so far this summer summer on Thursday, losing 11 billion tons of surface ice to the ocean, according to data from the Polar Portal, a website run by Danish polar research institutions, and the National Snow and Ice Data Center.


More links to this story.

The Arctic is burning and Greenland is melting, thanks to record heat

The Arctic's ice sheet is melting at a rapid rate: 11 billion tons in one day

In related news;

More than 150 Shark Sightings Recorded Off Coast of Massachusetts


https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...sightings-recorded-off-coast-of-massachusetts

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/sharks-cape-cod-trnd/index.html
And the cause is...Let the battle begin!
 
Greenland is called that for a reason. There are Nordic farms under the ice sheet. Take those icebergs and turn them into fresh water.

My dream of having a tomato garden in Greenland may yet happen.

Jo
 
I got a question.

The OP's link only shows temps going back about 150 years. The planet is 4.5 BILLION YEARS OLD.

So what happened to the polar ice caps for the other 99.99999% of the earths lifetime?
 
Yes.....and don't worry that those glaciers are sitting on top of volcanos....that wouldn't have anything to do with any melt we may be seeing....

That makes no sense, as glaciers generally not on volcanoes, and obviously not all volcanoes are going to suddenly become active all at once, like the melting glaciers are.
 
Greenland lost 11 billion tons of ice in one day. How does that melt compare to the past?

Scientists announced Thursday that July equaled, if not surpassed, the hottest month in recorded history. But that was not the only cause for concern.

Greenland's ice sheet melted at its most rapid rate so far this summer summer on Thursday, losing 11 billion tons of surface ice to the ocean, according to data from the Polar Portal, a website run by Danish polar research institutions, and the National Snow and Ice Data Center.


More links to this story.

The Arctic is burning and Greenland is melting, thanks to record heat

The Arctic's ice sheet is melting at a rapid rate: 11 billion tons in one day

In related news;

More than 150 Shark Sightings Recorded Off Coast of Massachusetts


https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...sightings-recorded-off-coast-of-massachusetts

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/sharks-cape-cod-trnd/index.html


I wanna talk to the guy that weighed it before to know how much melted,,,
and is there an instruction sheet for the planet to know thats not normal,,,

I call bullshit
 
Greenland lost 11 billion tons of ice in one day. How does that melt compare to the past?

Scientists announced Thursday that July equaled, if not surpassed, the hottest month in recorded history. But that was not the only cause for concern.

Greenland's ice sheet melted at its most rapid rate so far this summer summer on Thursday, losing 11 billion tons of surface ice to the ocean, according to data from the Polar Portal, a website run by Danish polar research institutions, and the National Snow and Ice Data Center.


More links to this story.

The Arctic is burning and Greenland is melting, thanks to record heat

The Arctic's ice sheet is melting at a rapid rate: 11 billion tons in one day

In related news;

More than 150 Shark Sightings Recorded Off Coast of Massachusetts


https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...sightings-recorded-off-coast-of-massachusetts

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/sharks-cape-cod-trnd/index.html
And the cause is...Let the battle begin!
God peed on them. Everyone knows that.
 
The Earth can easily survive climate change. It has for billions of years......
Wanna worry about something that really matters?

Plastics in the environment......
PHOTOS: An ocean of plastic
15df9010-b47f-11e9-ba3f-93b00b701565


b3ed1990-b47e-11e9-bdfd-37716d532d22


The-Island-of-Garbage-in-the-Pacific-is-Already-Bigger-Than-3-Countries.jpg


The study
The study characterized and quantified an important area of oceanic plastic accumulation formed in subtropical waters between California and Hawaii: the Great Pacific Garbage Patch (GPGP).

The model, calibrated with survey data from multiple ships and aircraft, predicted that at least 79 (45-129) thousand tons of oceanic plastic are floating within an area of 1.6 million km 2 ; a figure of four to sixteen times higher than that reported previously.

More than three quarters of the mass of GPGP was transported by debris of more than 5 cm and at least 46% was composed of fishing nets. Microplastics accounted for 8% of the total mass, but 94% of the 1.8 (1.1-3.6) trillion estimated pieces that floated in the area.

The plastic collected during the study has specific characteristics, such as a small surface-volume ratio, which indicates that only certain types of waste have the ability to persist and accumulate on the surface of the GPGP.

The specialists warn
“The concentration of plastic is increasing exponentially. I think the situation is getting worse, “said Laurent Lebreton, lead author of the Ocean Cleanup Foundation study in Deltf, the Netherlands.

“This highlights the urgency of taking measures to stop the arrival of plastics in the ocean and to clean up the existing disaster.”

“Shocking” quantity
Researchers used boats and planes to map this area in the northern Pacific Ocean, where rotating currents and winds cause marine debris to converge, including plastic, algae and plankton.

Erik van Sebille, of the University of Utrecht, in the Netherlands, commented that “Although the estimates have an uncertain range, they speak of an overwhelming amount of plastic”.

“And they also discovered that the island is moving more than what was expected.”
 
And how would we measure this? Got the data used to come up with this? How did they weigh the ice before and after?
 
Okay lets try this theory as Global Warming is just a theory also.

I love when science deniers display their abject ignorance by failing to understand the difference between a theory and a hypothesis.
I love when a science moron tries to debate me about science when they cant even tell the difference between a man and a woman. Go back to school get a real education, then come back and see if you can compete with my intellect.

You also conflate knowledge with intellect. You probably do the same with ignorance and stupidity. You don't comprehend words too good, do ya Sparky?
Yes, I do know for a fact that you are not only ignorant as hell, but stupid as they come. Again, instead of debating the issue where when temperatures are rising all over the world do to "Global Warming", then my little area should be hotter also, not below normal. Shame you are to much of a science denier to understand this, but then you wouldn't be a Marxist either.

This is what will happen to the climate in the next 100 years

And to think that with AOC's prediction this scientific estimate is about 88 1/2 years too late. They cant even get the dates right, a liberal mind, if they have one, is like a scrambled egg.

While I can see you are trying to be logical, but you are forgetting that the main engine of weather is heat.
And more heat means more wind, movement, storms, etc.
That additional energy has cause the cold in the Arctic, to become spread around much more than usual.
There usually are 6 distinct convention zones, rings around the globe, that weather does not normally cross over.
With the additional heat, the weather is crossing over between convention zones, and the cold Arctic is over 13 degrees warmer, and that is cooling off where you live by a few degrees.
But the sum is still significantly hotter.

Again, weather is local, while climate is the sum of all weather, and is global.
You experience weather, not climate.
 
Where I live, only a few thousand years ago, my state was buried under a mile of ice.

Thank GOD, He decided the planet needed warming so Man could survive in Michigan.

The normal ice age cycle is over 110,000 years long.
The recent global warming not only increase the temperature the same amount in less than 100 years, but is doing so when the normal climate cycles is supposed to be cooling.
We are adding additional heat on top of what is already supposed to be the peak.
The result of that may be the hottest this planet has ever seen.
It is possible nothing but microscopic life will survive that.
 
Greenland is called that for a reason. There are Nordic farms under the ice sheet. Take those icebergs and turn them into fresh water.

My dream of having a tomato garden in Greenland may yet happen.

Jo


Greenland was called Greenland because there was no snow at one point........that is why it was so Green and why the called it Greenland......

the man made global warming religion refuses to understand this.
 
Rigby5 said:
That makes no sense, as glaciers generally not on volcanoes.
Uh, Yeah
Generally They Are

Do You Know It Snows In Hawaii ??
 
Last edited:
Where I live, only a few thousand years ago, my state was buried under a mile of ice.

Thank GOD, He decided the planet needed warming so Man could survive in Michigan.

The normal ice age cycle is over 110,000 years long.
The recent global warming not only increase the temperature the same amount in less than 100 years, but is doing so when the normal climate cycles is supposed to be cooling.
We are adding additional heat on top of what is already supposed to be the peak.
The result of that may be the hottest this planet has ever seen.
It is possible nothing but microscopic life will survive that.


And......you are wrong.
 
The Arctic is on fire. Record-breaking temperatures and strong winds are fueling an unprecedented number of wildfires across the region this summer. In Siberia alone, hundreds of wildfires captured by satellite images July 28 spanned about 3 million hectares of land. Across Alaska, as many as 400 wildfires were burning as of mid-July. And the heat is also melting Greenland’s ice at an alarming rate.
The Arctic is burning and Greenland is melting, thanks to record heat
 
And how would we measure this? Got the data used to come up with this? How did they weigh the ice before and after?

More importantly, how did all those woolly mammoths, cave people, and miscellaneous other odds and ends showing up in the melted ice get there if the ice had not been gone before...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top