100% Smoking gun evidence of witness tampering and obstruction of justice by Team Trump

[depotoo]

Oh, my! The criminals being protected are the ones that created this scam.
Mueller Caught In Another Deception; Key 'Russia Link' Exposed As Informant For US, Ukraine

Seriously? The NewYorker magazine has them tied to the Alt_Right; Zero Hedge or ZeroHedge is described as a "markets-focused" blog,[4] that presents both in-house analysis, and analysis from investment banks, hedge funds, and other investment writers and analysts. Zero Hedge, per its motto,[a] is bearish in its investment outlook and analysis, often deriving from its adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles.[5] While often labeled as a financial permabear,[6][7] Zero Hedge is also seen as a source of "cutting-edge news, rumors and gossip about the financial industry".[8] Zero Hedge expanded into non-financial analysis,[c] where its editorial has been labelled by The New Yorker as being associated with the alt-right,[10][11] as well as being anti-establishment, conspiratorial, and showing a pro-Russian-bias.[10][9] Zero Hedge in-house content is posted under the pseudonym "Tyler Durden"; however, the founder and main editor was identified as Daniel Ivandjiiski.[9]

Come on. Aren't you smarter than this? Answer, hell no. You're juist another Kool-aid Drinking cultist who will believe anything that suits your narrative. You are shallow, weak, and dishonest.

Zero Hedge - Wikipedia I'm so embarrassed for you folks. The "Alt Right?"

I noticed you couldn’t refute them or the other links I gave you, other than “it’s true, I tell ya! It’s really really true!”

Do you realize your reputation here was shot a loooonnnngggg time ago?

Key figure that Mueller report linked to Russia was a State Department intel source

Why Mueller’s team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report and related court filings is not known. But the revelation of it comes as the accuracy of Mueller’s Russia conclusions face increased scrutiny. So, let's unpackage this shall we. Because obviously you need a lesson in semantics. " Why Mueller's team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report is not known." Do you know what "not known" means? It means there is no evidence Mueller had done something wrong. It also could mean that the other evidence Mueller has or doesn't have, was pushed to Congress and or SDNY. Is that a possibility? Of course it is. But did the Hill article establish that possibility? No! Why? Take a wild guess?

You really are dense. It was left out of the report, yet was actually known.
Just as Russia’s rally for Hillary was as well. Just as half of the phone transcript was. No telling how many more things they left out, which were pertinent. Surely, you aren’t going to continue to be this dense, but then again...

If it was actually known, then why did you provide a link explaining to us that it "WAS NOT KNOWN?" See how easy it is to find your dishonesty? You can't keep stroking your article with a broad brush and expect the rest of us to think you are credible. You've been backpedaling from the beginning of this thread. You've been had on multiple occasions already.

It was NOt KNOWN why it was left out. Come on, back, wake up!

 

[BWK]

Dondal Dork for Prisoner 2020

He will be YOUR great president till 2024.

Sorry, Donald Dork will never be viewed as a great President.

Subjective. Maybe not by you but probably will be by many.

History will not be kind for Donald.

It already has been
40 year low for unemployment among blacks

Since Obama, did their pay change? Because Black unemployment was low when Obama put in the stimulus that the Right complained about, yet the Right complained that the pay was not good either. Based on growing prices for goods and services, what has changed?

 

[BWK]

I showed you the entire link. Not the convenient part that you edited out yourself. You're dishonest, a loser, and a traitor to hide all the evidence against your country to protect a criminal. You should be ashamed.

Oh, my! The criminals being protected are the ones that created this scam.
Mueller Caught In Another Deception; Key 'Russia Link' Exposed As Informant For US, Ukraine

Seriously? The NewYorker magazine has them tied to the Alt_Right; Zero Hedge or ZeroHedge is described as a "markets-focused" blog,[4] that presents both in-house analysis, and analysis from investment banks, hedge funds, and other investment writers and analysts. Zero Hedge, per its motto,[a] is bearish in its investment outlook and analysis, often deriving from its adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles.[5] While often labeled as a financial permabear,[6][7] Zero Hedge is also seen as a source of "cutting-edge news, rumors and gossip about the financial industry".[8] Zero Hedge expanded into non-financial analysis,[c] where its editorial has been labelled by The New Yorker as being associated with the alt-right,[10][11] as well as being anti-establishment, conspiratorial, and showing a pro-Russian-bias.[10][9] Zero Hedge in-house content is posted under the pseudonym "Tyler Durden"; however, the founder and main editor was identified as Daniel Ivandjiiski.[9]

Come on. Aren't you smarter than this? Answer, hell no. You're juist another Kool-aid Drinking cultist who will believe anything that suits your narrative. You are shallow, weak, and dishonest.

Zero Hedge - Wikipedia I'm so embarrassed for you folks. The "Alt Right?"

I noticed you couldn’t refute them or the other links I gave you, other than “it’s true, I tell ya! It’s really really true!”

Do you realize your reputation here was shot a loooonnnngggg time ago?

Key figure that Mueller report linked to Russia was a State Department intel source

Why Mueller’s team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report and related court filings is not known. But the revelation of it comes as the accuracy of Mueller’s Russia conclusions face increased scrutiny. So, let's unpackage this shall we. Because obviously you need a lesson in semantics. " Why Mueller's team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report is not known." Do you know what "not known" means? It means there is no evidence Mueller had done something wrong. It also could mean that the other evidence Mueller has or doesn't have, was pushed to Congress and or SDNY. Is that a possibility? Of course it is. But did the Hill article establish that possibility? No! Why? Take a wild guess?

Refuting Zero Hedge is easy because they are Alt Right. Which proves your dishonesty.

And the Hill isn't much better. Most, if not all the Right wing publications conveniently leave out obvious clues of their dishonesty. And what's more, they're easy to find. Why and how? Because they are dishonest. Just like you. Dishonesty is easy to pick out in a conversation. And these Trump cultists constantly get caught up in it, at the expense of their own self respect, while publications like the Hill and Zero Hedge use you suckers as willful guinea pigs.

Then go back to where you came from and tell everybody THERE how fu**ed up the USA is. Otherwise you sound a lot like another moocher complainer.

It's not the USA. It's the criminals who are trying to ruin the USA like Trump and his cultists.

 

[depotoo]

He will be YOUR great president till 2024.

Sorry, Donald Dork will never be viewed as a great President.

Subjective. Maybe not by you but probably will be by many.

History will not be kind for Donald.

It already has been
40 year low for unemployment among blacks

Since Obama, did their pay change? Because Black unemployment was low when Obama put in the stimulus that the Right complained about, yet the Right complained that the pay was not good either. Based on growing prices for goods and services, what has changed?

Black unemployment falls to lowest level on record – The Denver Post

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Dondal Dork for Prisoner 2020

He will be YOUR great president till 2024.

Sorry, Donald Dork will never be viewed as a great President.

Subjective. Maybe not by you but probably will be by many.

He will go down as a great president, once we defeat liberalism. He loves America, liberals hate it. That's why Obama ran on transforming America and liberals praised it. Now we have men breaking women' records in sports.

You have to be a president to be great. He's a fake and a fraud. He's illegal.

LMAO. I broke this foreigner

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He will be YOUR great president till 2024.

Sorry, Donald Dork will never be viewed as a great President.

Subjective. Maybe not by you but probably will be by many.

History will not be kind for Donald.

It already has been
40 year low for unemployment among blacks

Since Obama, did their pay change? Because Black unemployment was low when Obama put in the stimulus that the Right complained about, yet the Right complained that the pay was not good either. Based on growing prices for goods and services, what has changed?

You’re not an American. Your opinion is irrelevant. Like your life.

 

[BWK]

Seriously? The NewYorker magazine has them tied to the Alt_Right; Zero Hedge or ZeroHedge is described as a "markets-focused" blog,[4] that presents both in-house analysis, and analysis from investment banks, hedge funds, and other investment writers and analysts. Zero Hedge, per its motto,[a] is bearish in its investment outlook and analysis, often deriving from its adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles.[5] While often labeled as a financial permabear,[6][7] Zero Hedge is also seen as a source of "cutting-edge news, rumors and gossip about the financial industry".[8] Zero Hedge expanded into non-financial analysis,[c] where its editorial has been labelled by The New Yorker as being associated with the alt-right,[10][11] as well as being anti-establishment, conspiratorial, and showing a pro-Russian-bias.[10][9] Zero Hedge in-house content is posted under the pseudonym "Tyler Durden"; however, the founder and main editor was identified as Daniel Ivandjiiski.[9]

Come on. Aren't you smarter than this? Answer, hell no. You're juist another Kool-aid Drinking cultist who will believe anything that suits your narrative. You are shallow, weak, and dishonest.

Zero Hedge - Wikipedia I'm so embarrassed for you folks. The "Alt Right?"

I noticed you couldn’t refute them or the other links I gave you, other than “it’s true, I tell ya! It’s really really true!”

Do you realize your reputation here was shot a loooonnnngggg time ago?

Key figure that Mueller report linked to Russia was a State Department intel source

Why Mueller’s team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report and related court filings is not known. But the revelation of it comes as the accuracy of Mueller’s Russia conclusions face increased scrutiny. So, let's unpackage this shall we. Because obviously you need a lesson in semantics. " Why Mueller's team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report is not known." Do you know what "not known" means? It means there is no evidence Mueller had done something wrong. It also could mean that the other evidence Mueller has or doesn't have, was pushed to Congress and or SDNY. Is that a possibility? Of course it is. But did the Hill article establish that possibility? No! Why? Take a wild guess?

You really are dense. It was left out of the report, yet was actually known.
Just as Russia’s rally for Hillary was as well. Just as half of the phone transcript was. No telling how many more things they left out, which were pertinent. Surely, you aren’t going to continue to be this dense, but then again...

If it was actually known, then why did you provide a link explaining to us that it "WAS NOT KNOWN?" See how easy it is to find your dishonesty? You can't keep stroking your article with a broad brush and expect the rest of us to think you are credible. You've been backpedaling from the beginning of this thread. You've been had on multiple occasions already.

It was NOt KNOWN why it was left out. Come on, back, wake up!

Lol! Those two words left you with your britches down, because it proved how dishonest you are, and how incomplete the article is. They put that in there so they wouldn't be looked at as total fools. But it did make a fool of you, and exposed your dishonesty. Do you really believe I am not going to be able to pick apart anything you try and throw at me? Find another bs site like the Hill and Zero Hedge, that you believe can change facts on the ground.

Get it in your thick skulls cultists. Mueller has covered all the bases, and referred the cases to SDNY and or Congress. Whatever is left untold or unknown already has a referred spot. What is known however, in the public sphere of evidence, has uncovered multiple counts of obstruction and witness tampering. And to embarrass yourselves with hypothetical nonsense from Alt -Right sites isn't going to help you, so forget it. Your desperation is made abundantly obvious when you manufacture these bogus arguments.

 

[BWK]

Sorry, Donald Dork will never be viewed as a great President.

Subjective. Maybe not by you but probably will be by many.

History will not be kind for Donald.

It already has been
40 year low for unemployment among blacks

Since Obama, did their pay change? Because Black unemployment was low when Obama put in the stimulus that the Right complained about, yet the Right complained that the pay was not good either. Based on growing prices for goods and services, what has changed?

You’re not an American. Your opinion is irrelevant. Like your life.

Boss, let it go. You're done. Lol!

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Subjective. Maybe not by you but probably will be by many.

History will not be kind for Donald.

It already has been
40 year low for unemployment among blacks

Since Obama, did their pay change? Because Black unemployment was low when Obama put in the stimulus that the Right complained about, yet the Right complained that the pay was not good either. Based on growing prices for goods and services, what has changed?

You’re not an American. Your opinion is irrelevant. Like your life.

Boss, let it go. You're done. Lol!

I am Your Boss. And I am better than you. My passport says so. I exposed You. Fraud. Where you from? Saudi? Iran?

 

[depotoo]

I noticed you couldn’t refute them or the other links I gave you, other than “it’s true, I tell ya! It’s really really true!”

Do you realize your reputation here was shot a loooonnnngggg time ago?

Key figure that Mueller report linked to Russia was a State Department intel source

Why Mueller’s team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report and related court filings is not known. But the revelation of it comes as the accuracy of Mueller’s Russia conclusions face increased scrutiny. So, let's unpackage this shall we. Because obviously you need a lesson in semantics. " Why Mueller's team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report is not known." Do you know what "not known" means? It means there is no evidence Mueller had done something wrong. It also could mean that the other evidence Mueller has or doesn't have, was pushed to Congress and or SDNY. Is that a possibility? Of course it is. But did the Hill article establish that possibility? No! Why? Take a wild guess?

You really are dense. It was left out of the report, yet was actually known.
Just as Russia’s rally for Hillary was as well. Just as half of the phone transcript was. No telling how many more things they left out, which were pertinent. Surely, you aren’t going to continue to be this dense, but then again...

If it was actually known, then why did you provide a link explaining to us that it "WAS NOT KNOWN?" See how easy it is to find your dishonesty? You can't keep stroking your article with a broad brush and expect the rest of us to think you are credible. You've been backpedaling from the beginning of this thread. You've been had on multiple occasions already.

It was NOt KNOWN why it was left out. Come on, back, wake up!

Lol! Those two words left you with your britches down, because it proved how dishonest you are, and how incomplete the article is. They put that in there so they wouldn't be looked at as total fools. But it did make a fool of you, and exposed your dishonesty. Do you really believe I am not going to be able to pick apart anything you try and throw at me? Find another bs site like the Hill and Zero Hedge, that you believe can change facts on the ground.

Get it in your thick skulls cultists. Mueller has covered all the bases, and referred the cases to SDNY and or Congress. Whatever is left untold or unknown already has a referred spot. What is known however, in the public sphere of evidence, has uncovered multiple counts of obstruction and witness tampering. And to embarrass yourselves with hypothetical nonsense from Alt -Right sites isn't going to help you, so forget it. Your desperation is made abundantly obvious when you manufacture these bogus arguments.

BWK, you wouldn’t not the truth if it hit you smack in the face. Your spouting like you have won something, spitting out insults, etc, when you have obviously lost, just makes you look even more foolish than you are, and changes no actual facts. Have fun.

 

[BWK]

Why Mueller’s team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report and related court filings is not known. But the revelation of it comes as the accuracy of Mueller’s Russia conclusions face increased scrutiny. So, let's unpackage this shall we. Because obviously you need a lesson in semantics. " Why Mueller's team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report is not known." Do you know what "not known" means? It means there is no evidence Mueller had done something wrong. It also could mean that the other evidence Mueller has or doesn't have, was pushed to Congress and or SDNY. Is that a possibility? Of course it is. But did the Hill article establish that possibility? No! Why? Take a wild guess?

You really are dense. It was left out of the report, yet was actually known.
Just as Russia’s rally for Hillary was as well. Just as half of the phone transcript was. No telling how many more things they left out, which were pertinent. Surely, you aren’t going to continue to be this dense, but then again...

If it was actually known, then why did you provide a link explaining to us that it "WAS NOT KNOWN?" See how easy it is to find your dishonesty? You can't keep stroking your article with a broad brush and expect the rest of us to think you are credible. You've been backpedaling from the beginning of this thread. You've been had on multiple occasions already.

It was NOt KNOWN why it was left out. Come on, back, wake up!

Lol! Those two words left you with your britches down, because it proved how dishonest you are, and how incomplete the article is. They put that in there so they wouldn't be looked at as total fools. But it did make a fool of you, and exposed your dishonesty. Do you really believe I am not going to be able to pick apart anything you try and throw at me? Find another bs site like the Hill and Zero Hedge, that you believe can change facts on the ground.

Get it in your thick skulls cultists. Mueller has covered all the bases, and referred the cases to SDNY and or Congress. Whatever is left untold or unknown already has a referred spot. What is known however, in the public sphere of evidence, has uncovered multiple counts of obstruction and witness tampering. And to embarrass yourselves with hypothetical nonsense from Alt -Right sites isn't going to help you, so forget it. Your desperation is made abundantly obvious when you manufacture these bogus arguments.

BWK, you wouldn’t not the truth if it hit you smack in the face. Your spouting like you have won something, spitting out insults, etc, when you have obviously lost, just makes you look even more foolish than you are, and changes no actual facts. Have fun.

I did win. You got schooled on the semantics of your own dishonest links, and you failed to rebut. So yes, you lost. Until you produce something with honesty, you'll stay the loser.

 

[BWK]

History will not be kind for Donald.

It already has been
40 year low for unemployment among blacks

Since Obama, did their pay change? Because Black unemployment was low when Obama put in the stimulus that the Right complained about, yet the Right complained that the pay was not good either. Based on growing prices for goods and services, what has changed?

You’re not an American. Your opinion is irrelevant. Like your life.

Boss, let it go. You're done. Lol!

I am Your Boss. And I am better than you. My passport says so. I exposed You. Fraud. Where you from? Saudi? Iran?

An area that doesn't entertain the willfully retarded.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It already has been
40 year low for unemployment among blacks

Since Obama, did their pay change? Because Black unemployment was low when Obama put in the stimulus that the Right complained about, yet the Right complained that the pay was not good either. Based on growing prices for goods and services, what has changed?

You’re not an American. Your opinion is irrelevant. Like your life.

Boss, let it go. You're done. Lol!

I am Your Boss. And I am better than you. My passport says so. I exposed You. Fraud. Where you from? Saudi? Iran?

An area that doesn't entertain the willfully retarded.

You just admitted again that you’re not American. This is fun. You’re inferior.

 

[lantern2814]

Lantern2814 with funny faces hasn't got shit. He's still a loser.

Again jackass, I don't need anything,. YOU need to prove your idiotic assertions. Maybe you should have given all this info to Mueller. Seems he couldn't find any. Continue your meltdown.

Congress has it and thanks for playing. Your time is up here because you're a miserable liar and a loser. Take a hike.

Wrong again you uneducated moron. Schitt for. Rains, Nadless, and Pisslosi have a total of NOTHING. My time is up? You're a joke boy. Now run away like you always do once you start getting your head handed to you.

Let us know when you join up with a brain somewhere that allows you the ability to manufacture a cognitive narrative that involves intelligent debate. In the mean time, you're in good company with this rest of the Gargoyles in your cult.

What part of you have no proof do you not understand? Keep it up loser, all you're doing is entertaing us with your stupidity. Too bad the stupid pet tricks segment doesn't exist anymore. A sheep like you would really fit in there.

 

[jknowgood]

Subjective. Maybe not by you but probably will be by many.

History will not be kind for Donald.

After this investigation against Muller, history won't look good for liberals.

The investigation against Mueller will never actually exist in the real world. Only in fantasy. You can't investigate something real if it doesn't exist.

Please turn off CNN, you might see what's going on. Muller edited evidence, I'm surprised you still support him. NOT! Lol

Your comprehension skills are useless or you read with lying eyes. Either way, you are a loser.

Looking in the mirror when you thought that one up?

 

[jknowgood]

Dondal Dork for Prisoner 2020

He will be YOUR great president till 2024.

Sorry, Donald Dork will never be viewed as a great President.

Subjective. Maybe not by you but probably will be by many.

He will go down as a great president, once we defeat liberalism. He loves America, liberals hate it. That's why Obama ran on transforming America and liberals praised it. Now we have men breaking women' records in sports.

You have to be a president to be great. He's a fake and a fraud. He's illegal.

He was elected by a majority of the state's. The way the founding fathers made it. See you really do hate the way America is.

 

[jknowgood]

He will be YOUR great president till 2024.

Sorry, Donald Dork will never be viewed as a great President.

Subjective. Maybe not by you but probably will be by many.

History will not be kind for Donald.

It already has been
40 year low for unemployment among blacks

Since Obama, did their pay change? Because Black unemployment was low when Obama put in the stimulus that the Right complained about, yet the Right complained that the pay was not good either. Based on growing prices for goods and services, what has changed?

Trump has made Obama's policies a bad memory.

 

[Lumpy 1]

And it was on audio for everyone to hear perfectly what was said. For the Democrats in the House to do nothing about holding Trump accountable,would be a dereliction of their oath at this point.

Oh come on .. how can you take that crap seriously without being labeled a gullible moron?

Trump parasites feeding and spewing is about all you got, enjoy ...
.

 

[BWK]

And it was on audio for everyone to hear perfectly what was said. For the Democrats in the House to do nothing about holding Trump accountable,would be a dereliction of their oath at this point.

Oh come on .. how can you take that crap seriously without being labeled a gullible moron?

Trump parasites feeding and spewing is about all you got, enjoy ...
.

Only an unprepared moron of a Trump stooge would show up here with no counter arguments. They're all still losers folks. Six pages and they still haven't said shit.

 

[BWK]

Sorry, Donald Dork will never be viewed as a great President.

Subjective. Maybe not by you but probably will be by many.

History will not be kind for Donald.

It already has been
40 year low for unemployment among blacks

Since Obama, did their pay change? Because Black unemployment was low when Obama put in the stimulus that the Right complained about, yet the Right complained that the pay was not good either. Based on growing prices for goods and services, what has changed?

Trump has made Obama's policies a bad memory.

Speaking of bad memories, can you imagine memorializing Trump over being indicted and or impeached? I know, neither can I. It will be a celebration instead.