jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,203
- 34,939
- 2,180
I take a shit a day, guess so before I poopWell, if we saw dead people, they would say, “ You’re FOS.”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I take a shit a day, guess so before I poopWell, if we saw dead people, they would say, “ You’re FOS.”
So you finally admit, you deniers just have opinions. No evidence, no facts, just opinions.They are qualified to examine the data and render an informed opinion
Are you trying to act sane ?I take a shit a day, guess so before I poop
Yup, she is smarter. Her posts uses more correct English than you. You’d think it’s your second language.Dont you want to move that argument to the playground?
Its so childish thats where it belongs
Are you in the habit of not reading what this thread is about ?I have no idea what you are talking about
So you now don’t think all the immigrants at our southern border is an emergency ?An "emergency" is...a serious, unexpected, and often dangerous situation requiring immediate action.
There is no climate emergency. There is no feasible immediate action that would measurably slow the warming of the climate to the extent that it would make a damn bit of difference in the next hundred years. Furthermore, should the predictions of the rational few climate scientists prove accurate, there are mountains of mitigations that we human would/will take to ease the pain. For example, either Miami, Manhattan, New Orleans or Venice will be inundated. The few inhabited islands that are in danger of immersion will have their populations moved at public expense.
The "emergency" talk is for one purpose: to allow the political Left to grasp more power to control the lives of the unsuspecting masses. And the immediate effect would be to make life more expensive and difficult for the working classes NOW, in the hope that some speculative, miniscule impacts will be avoided in a hundred years.
Sometimes you wander into a world of your own and make no sense at allAre you in the habit of not reading what this thread is about ?
Correct, that exceeds your opinions with no evidenceSo you finally admit, you deniers just have opinions. No evidence, no facts, just opinions.
The funny part is that you actually believe that.They are qualified to examine the data and render an informed opinion
Even the dead ones ?They are qualified to examine the data and render an informed opinion
No, it represents a rejection of your hystera and fear of the futureThe funny part is that you actually believe that.
This represents a profound misunderstanding of the entire basis of science.
Presumably they were not dead when they examined the dataEven the dead ones ?
Area YOU saying they are experts because they have degrees from universities that take money and cheat on climate change ? How does that make sense bubba ?Presumably they were not dead when they examined the data
Nothing you say makes sense, including that questionArea YOU saying they are experts because they have degrees from universities that take money and cheat on climate change ? How does that make sense bubba ?
It makes sense to non idiots. I’m absolutely sure you’re math and science illiterate but obviously have an opinion on everything you know nothing about. It always matches the Tucker line of the day.Nothing you say makes sense, including that question
YupThe funny part is that you actually believe that.
This represents a profound misunderstanding of the entire basis of science.
Did you say something?Area YOU saying they are experts because they have degrees from universities that take money and cheat on climate change ? How does that make sense bubba ?
Dufus, they render no opinions. They literally just crank out the data and indicate where and how they achieve it. Then foolish, they summarize the math they used. It’s not magic. But being you’re both math and science illiterate, like Tucker and drop out Hannity, you trogs just mimic the lie of the day.They are qualified to examine the data and render an informed opinion
You didn’t use any punctuation either.Did you say something?
I wasnt listening
How so?The funny part is that you actually believe that.
This represents a profound misunderstanding of the entire basis of science.