Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She didn't say them in the context they were presented (like NBC with Zimmerman) and Brietbart didn't research what he was given (like Dan Rather with Bush).Of course. Just like Dan Rather, eh?FOUND IT.
Yes, he only showed 2 minutes of the speech, but according to him thats what was sent to him. From what I can see there was no internal editing.
What NBC did was REMOVE part of the conversation, explicitly to make Zimmerman look like he said the guy was suspsicious and black, when he never said black before he was asked what color the person was.
Any form of editing is weasely, but the NBC case more so.
A real journalist would have found the real video before he labeled Sharrod as a racist in that manner.
the difference is Sherrod actually said those things. The Memogate memo was A FAKE. it never existed, it was a figment. You can argue context with the Sherrod thing, you cannot argue context over a fake memo.
Do you think that way about anyone that smokes pot?As tragic as ending this young man's life is, Trayvon Martin is a druggie and deserved what happened.
She didn't say them in the context they were presented (like NBC with Zimmerman) and Brietbart didn't research what he was given (like Dan Rather with Bush).Of course. Just like Dan Rather, eh?
A real journalist would have found the real video before he labeled Sharrod as a racist in that manner.
the difference is Sherrod actually said those things. The Memogate memo was A FAKE. it never existed, it was a figment. You can argue context with the Sherrod thing, you cannot argue context over a fake memo.
But that's different, somehow.
The tape was edited to paint Sherrod as acting on racist feelings when she did no such thing.She didn't say them in the context they were presented (like NBC with Zimmerman) and Brietbart didn't research what he was given (like Dan Rather with Bush).the difference is Sherrod actually said those things. The Memogate memo was A FAKE. it never existed, it was a figment. You can argue context with the Sherrod thing, you cannot argue context over a fake memo.
But that's different, somehow.
The edit RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TAPE is the real issue.
Sherrod was able to get her entire thought out, and she admitted racist feelings affected her job all those years ago. I forget though, that only republicans are held accountable for EVERY racist feeling they have. Democrats who used to be in the KKK are forgiven instantly.
And again, the Rather document was 100% FAKE. Sherrod said what she said, and did what she did, even if it was a long time ago.
If you cant get the difference, then you being dense isnt my fault or concern.
I don't blame him, but he'll only win his suit if he's found innocent.
wrong. you clearly don't understand defamation.
There's no defamation.
If anything..NBC was very fair to Zimmerman.
That fuck went human hunting.
The tape was edited to paint Sherrod as acting on racist feelings when she did no such thing.She didn't say them in the context they were presented (like NBC with Zimmerman) and Brietbart didn't research what he was given (like Dan Rather with Bush).
But that's different, somehow.
The edit RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TAPE is the real issue.
Sherrod was able to get her entire thought out, and she admitted racist feelings affected her job all those years ago. I forget though, that only republicans are held accountable for EVERY racist feeling they have. Democrats who used to be in the KKK are forgiven instantly.
And again, the Rather document was 100% FAKE. Sherrod said what she said, and did what she did, even if it was a long time ago.
If you cant get the difference, then you being dense isnt my fault or concern.
I'm no longer surprised that you've gone totally to the rightwingnutter side.
The tape was edited to paint Sherrod as acting on racist feelings when she did no such thing.The edit RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TAPE is the real issue.
Sherrod was able to get her entire thought out, and she admitted racist feelings affected her job all those years ago. I forget though, that only republicans are held accountable for EVERY racist feeling they have. Democrats who used to be in the KKK are forgiven instantly.
And again, the Rather document was 100% FAKE. Sherrod said what she said, and did what she did, even if it was a long time ago.
If you cant get the difference, then you being dense isnt my fault or concern.
I'm no longer surprised that you've gone totally to the rightwingnutter side.
Nah, im right where I have always been. Briebart did provide only the section he was given, and maybe he could have done more. NBC ACTIVELY edited the 911 call, knowing the entire call and how it went. Rather blissfully ignored questions on the authenticy of the memo, and to this day defends it.
The two are greater than the one in terms of hackery, you just dont see it.
He doesn't have to prove anything.......The tape was edited to paint Sherrod as acting on racist feelings when she did no such thing.
I'm no longer surprised that you've gone totally to the rightwingnutter side.
Nah, im right where I have always been. Briebart did provide only the section he was given, and maybe he could have done more. NBC ACTIVELY edited the 911 call, knowing the entire call and how it went. Rather blissfully ignored questions on the authenticy of the memo, and to this day defends it.
The two are greater than the one in terms of hackery, you just dont see it.
They are all equal in hackery, imo. Or stupidity.
But I will be interested in the outcome of this trial. Implying someone is racist will now be a sue-able offense. And it will be interesting to watch Zimmerman prove that he isn't a racist.
He doesn't have to prove anything.......Nah, im right where I have always been. Briebart did provide only the section he was given, and maybe he could have done more. NBC ACTIVELY edited the 911 call, knowing the entire call and how it went. Rather blissfully ignored questions on the authenticy of the memo, and to this day defends it.
The two are greater than the one in terms of hackery, you just dont see it.
They are all equal in hackery, imo. Or stupidity.
But I will be interested in the outcome of this trial. Implying someone is racist will now be a sue-able offense. And it will be interesting to watch Zimmerman prove that he isn't a racist.
In order to win a civil lawsuit for libel or slander, you will need to be able to prove that the statement (either written or spoken) was false. In other words, you have to demonstrate in court that the statement has no element of truth. This can be far more difficult than you would imagine, so it's important that you pay attention to this point.
She didn't say them in the context they were presented (like NBC with Zimmerman) and Brietbart didn't research what he was given (like Dan Rather with Bush).the difference is Sherrod actually said those things. The Memogate memo was A FAKE. it never existed, it was a figment. You can argue context with the Sherrod thing, you cannot argue context over a fake memo.
But that's different, somehow.
The edit RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TAPE is the real issue.
Sherrod was able to get her entire thought out, and she admitted racist feelings affected her job all those years ago. I forget though, that only republicans are held accountable for EVERY racist feeling they have. Democrats who used to be in the KKK are forgiven instantly.
And again, the Rather document was 100% FAKE. Sherrod said what she said, and did what she did, even if it was a long time ago.
If you cant get the difference, then you being dense isnt my fault or concern.
This picture taken a few minutes after medics and police arrived will in itself end any trial.
The case will be dropped.
You should sue her. If she did.She didn't say them in the context they were presented (like NBC with Zimmerman) and Brietbart didn't research what he was given (like Dan Rather with Bush).
But that's different, somehow.
The edit RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TAPE is the real issue.
Sherrod was able to get her entire thought out, and she admitted racist feelings affected her job all those years ago. I forget though, that only republicans are held accountable for EVERY racist feeling they have. Democrats who used to be in the KKK are forgiven instantly.
And again, the Rather document was 100% FAKE. Sherrod said what she said, and did what she did, even if it was a long time ago.
If you cant get the difference, then you being dense isnt my fault or concern.
In that speech Sherrod also called us racist for objecting to Obamacare.
This is the guy ravi was squawking for weeks about being a great big guy. How funny.
Do you think that way about anyone that smokes pot?As tragic as ending this young man's life is, Trayvon Martin is a druggie and deserved what happened.
I was talking about the criminal trial, where the prosecution has the burden of proof.He doesn't have to prove anything.......They are all equal in hackery, imo. Or stupidity.
But I will be interested in the outcome of this trial. Implying someone is racist will now be a sue-able offense. And it will be interesting to watch Zimmerman prove that he isn't a racist.In order to win a civil lawsuit for libel or slander, you will need to be able to prove that the statement (either written or spoken) was false. In other words, you have to demonstrate in court that the statement has no element of truth. This can be far more difficult than you would imagine, so it's important that you pay attention to this point.
How to Prove Libel or Slander for a Civil Lawsuit - Yahoo! Voices - voices.yahoo.com
The tape was edited to paint Sherrod as acting on racist feelings when she did no such thing.
I'm no longer surprised that you've gone totally to the rightwingnutter side.
Nah, im right where I have always been. Briebart did provide only the section he was given, and maybe he could have done more. NBC ACTIVELY edited the 911 call, knowing the entire call and how it went. Rather blissfully ignored questions on the authenticy of the memo, and to this day defends it.
The two are greater than the one in terms of hackery, you just dont see it.
They are all equal in hackery, imo. Or stupidity.
But I will be interested in the outcome of this trial. Implying someone is racist will now be a sue-able offense. And it will be interesting to watch Zimmerman prove that he isn't a racist.
You should sue her. If she did.The edit RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TAPE is the real issue.
Sherrod was able to get her entire thought out, and she admitted racist feelings affected her job all those years ago. I forget though, that only republicans are held accountable for EVERY racist feeling they have. Democrats who used to be in the KKK are forgiven instantly.
And again, the Rather document was 100% FAKE. Sherrod said what she said, and did what she did, even if it was a long time ago.
If you cant get the difference, then you being dense isnt my fault or concern.
In that speech Sherrod also called us racist for objecting to Obamacare.