playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 58,026
- 51,517
- 3,645
We're independent because we say so.
if the money is truly seperate then you wont mind losing just the amount of money spent on providing abortions, just to make sure right? you can make that amount up from wherever PP gets the rest of its money that doesnt come from the government right??
Summary: S.142 — 113th Congress (2013-2014)All Bill Information (Except Text)
Listen to this page
There is one summary for S.142. Bill summaries are authored by CRS.
Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (01/24/2013)
Hyde Amendment Codification Act - Prohibits the expenditure for any abortion of funds authorized or appropriated by federal law or funds in any trust fund to which funds are authorized or appropriated by federal law .
Prohibits the use of federal funds for any health benefits coverage that includes abortion. (Currently, federal funds cannot be used for abortion services, and plans receiving federal funds must keep them segregated from any funds for abortion services.)
Excludes from such prohibitions an abortion if: (1) the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest; or (2) the woman suffers from a physical disorder, injury, or illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that would place her in danger of death unless an abortion is performed, as certified by a physician.
S.142 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Hyde Amendment Codification Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress