Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Israel,,,communist, therefore all Jews, Communist also....the list goes on and on..Which reminds me, the Energizer Bunny, communist....like the influenza, communism is spread by the air that a communist breathes, infecting all those around them..be sure to wear a mask when speaking to or being around known communist.Uh-huh and it's worked out so spectacularly for the 100's of millions of people that have lived in countries where it's been implemented too, just ask all the slaves..er "citizens" of the former Soviet Union just how peachy things were.Btw, does anybody know, in reality both communism and socialism were based on very wide low-level democracy. People didn't have ability to say "Hey, Brezhnev, you doing something wrong!", but could say "hey, my boss - you are really doing something wrong!" - don't try to repeat it in current life.
So, it's a logical, Ayn Rand hated the communism, because she couldn't live in communism, like her bloodsuckers family... Communism is really a formation for million people, which prefer to live by their labor, not by slave-like exploitation of other people...
So even though you claim you have had your rights trodden upon here in the US, you can't state how you have been so terribly denied any liberties and freedoms. Rather, you change the narrative with what you see as cleaver ad hominem, but are nothing but signs of immaturity.At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
Chica, tell us all PRECISELY what liberties and freedoms you have personally lost here in the US having origins in the war torn Korean peninsula. You've made this claim multiple times, but you never specifically relate the rights and privileges, of which you have been deprived, denied or lost after arrival in this Country. Instead, you imply only vague references depicting other political thoughts and philosophies which are anathema here as the basis of your assertions, but which are part of life in the area of your heritage. So tell us about your lost rights and privileges as you see them so they may be examined objectively for their validity.
Are you admitting that you are a communist?
But the USA is not a democracy,,sorry old chap, but that alley oop won't score you shit......You say COmmunism, then at the bottom it says Socialism. Er...
Clean off your specs.
The OP explains:
Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.
But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."
In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:
"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales
Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.
It follows:
1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.
a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.
b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.
2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:
a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.
b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981
c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.
And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society
Read more- if you dare, Liberals.
You're running out of original crackpot ideas.
There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
Meaning you have to admit that the OP is 100% accurate.
Gracias.
Communism, socialism and liberalism - good company... Add here a feodalism, it based at a faith in government too... :
Welcome to the board, Sbiker.
What do you mean, 'good company'?
I know of no such term as 'feodalism.'
Feudalism. Sorry for my spelling.
I mean, if you could see a bloody battles between communists and liberals here, you should not combine this two different things.
Liberalism - is priority of individualism over the society. In fact, people cannot live in society and feel free of it, so in practice liberalism is a kind of parasitism of some people on others.
Communism, in ideal - is something like "superdemocracy" - a dictatorship of working majority. Without rules of defence of some minority groups in society. It's a reason of hate of communism from some different kind of people...
You are confusing Classical Liberalism and modern liberalism as practiced in the USA, and clearly the focus of this thread. These two ideologies are diametrically opposed. However, modern liberalism and Communism have much in common.You say COmmunism, then at the bottom it says Socialism. Er...
Clean off your specs.
The OP explains:
Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.
But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."
In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:
"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales
Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.
It follows:
1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.
a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.
b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.
2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:
a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.
b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981
c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.
And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society
Read more- if you dare, Liberals.
You're running out of original crackpot ideas.
There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
Meaning you have to admit that the OP is 100% accurate.
Gracias.
Communism, socialism and liberalism - good company... Add here a feodalism, it based at a faith in government too... :
Welcome to the board, Sbiker.
What do you mean, 'good company'?
I know of no such term as 'feodalism.'
Feudalism. Sorry for my spelling.
I mean, if you could see a bloody battles between communists and liberals here, you should not combine this two different things.
Liberalism - is priority of individualism over the society. In fact, people cannot live in society and feel free of it, so in practice liberalism is a kind of parasitism of some people on others.
Communism, in ideal - is something like "superdemocracy" - a dictatorship of working majority. Without rules of defence of some minority groups in society. It's a reason of hate of communism from some different kind of people...
Are we starving to death? According to PC, the US is a communist country.
It's like the Communist Manifesto, the Bible, Mein Kamph, they suck, they are dry, philosophical moments I don't feel the propaganda lifting my spirit....I'd rather be reading IRS laws....Those can be eye crossers...I have, yet feel the need to wretch...Do you always quote crazy people from your head?
Just wondering.....have you read her books?
So....you have strong feelings based on ignorance?
It is one of the benefits of being a Liberal....you never have to read anything, or even know anything.
A real time saver.
Like the no private land thingy?You are confusing Classical Liberalism and modern liberalism as practiced in the USA, and clearly the focus of this thread. These two ideologies are diametrically opposed. However, modern liberalism and Communism have much in common.You say COmmunism, then at the bottom it says Socialism. Er...
Clean off your specs.
The OP explains:
You're running out of original crackpot ideas.
There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
Meaning you have to admit that the OP is 100% accurate.
Gracias.
Communism, socialism and liberalism - good company... Add here a feodalism, it based at a faith in government too... :
Welcome to the board, Sbiker.
What do you mean, 'good company'?
I know of no such term as 'feodalism.'
Feudalism. Sorry for my spelling.
I mean, if you could see a bloody battles between communists and liberals here, you should not combine this two different things.
Liberalism - is priority of individualism over the society. In fact, people cannot live in society and feel free of it, so in practice liberalism is a kind of parasitism of some people on others.
Communism, in ideal - is something like "superdemocracy" - a dictatorship of working majority. Without rules of defence of some minority groups in society. It's a reason of hate of communism from some different kind of people...
You say COmmunism, then at the bottom it says Socialism. Er...
Clean off your specs.
The OP explains:
Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.
But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."
In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:
"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales
Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.
It follows:
1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.
a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.
b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.
2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:
a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.
b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981
c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.
And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society
Read more- if you dare, Liberals.
You're running out of original crackpot ideas.
There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
Meaning you have to admit that the OP is 100% accurate.
Gracias.
Communism, socialism and liberalism - good company... Add here a feodalism, it based at a faith in government too... :
Welcome to the board, Sbiker.
What do you mean, 'good company'?
I know of no such term as 'feodalism.'
Feudalism. Sorry for my spelling.
I mean, if you could see a bloody battles between communists and liberals here, you should not combine this two different things.
Liberalism - is priority of individualism over the society. In fact, people cannot live in society and feel free of it, so in practice liberalism is a kind of parasitism of some people on others.
Communism, in ideal - is something like "superdemocracy" - a dictatorship of working majority. Without rules of defence of some minority groups in society. It's a reason of hate of communism from some different kind of people...
Actually it was written by a middle income kid who saw the abuses of the lower classes and felt empathy enough to write a dissertation about what he thought could fix...Do you always quote crazy people from your head?
+1
Btw, does anybody know, in reality both communism and socialism were based on very wide low-level democracy. People didn't have ability to say "Hey, Brezhnev, you doing something wrong!", but could say "hey, my boss - you are really doing something wrong!" - don't try to repeat it in current life.
So, it's a logical, Ayn Rand hated the communism, because she couldn't live in communism, like her bloodsuckers family... Communism is really a formation for million people, which prefer to live by their labor, not by slave-like exploitation of other people...
So even though you claim you have had your rights trodden upon here in the US, you can't state how you have been so terribly denied any liberties and freedoms. Rather, you change the narrative with what you see as cleaver ad hominem, but are nothing but signs of immaturity.At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
Chica, tell us all PRECISELY what liberties and freedoms you have personally lost here in the US having origins in the war torn Korean peninsula. You've made this claim multiple times, but you never specifically relate the rights and privileges, of which you have been deprived, denied or lost after arrival in this Country. Instead, you imply only vague references depicting other political thoughts and philosophies which are anathema here as the basis of your assertions, but which are part of life in the area of your heritage. So tell us about your lost rights and privileges as you see them so they may be examined objectively for their validity.
Are you admitting that you are a communist?
Are we starving to death? According to PC, the US is a communist country.
If it wasn't for the evil, socialist, food stamps thousands of people would be indeed be starving under the holy "free" market rules
In the spirit of the OP which proves nothing........and as William Shakespeare said in a play, Nothing shall come of nothing, I speak anon...King Lear..It's like the Communist Manifesto, the Bible, Mein Kamph, they suck, they are dry, philosophical moments I don't feel the propaganda lifting my spirit....I'd rather be reading IRS laws....Those can be eye crossers...I have, yet feel the need to wretch...Do you always quote crazy people from your head?
Just wondering.....have you read her books?
So....you have strong feelings based on ignorance?
It is one of the benefits of being a Liberal....you never have to read anything, or even know anything.
A real time saver.
So you rushed out to this thread to proclaim you know nothing?
Excellent.
Communism did not come from Ayn Rand....Actually it was written by a middle income kid who saw the abuses of the lower classes and felt empathy enough to write a dissertation about what he thought could fix...Do you always quote crazy people from your head?
+1
Btw, does anybody know, in reality both communism and socialism were based on very wide low-level democracy. People didn't have ability to say "Hey, Brezhnev, you doing something wrong!", but could say "hey, my boss - you are really doing something wrong!" - don't try to repeat it in current life.
So, it's a logical, Ayn Rand hated the communism, because she couldn't live in communism, like her bloodsuckers family... Communism is really a formation for million people, which prefer to live by their labor, not by slave-like exploitation of other people...
Alisa Rosenbaum, known as Ayn Rand, were not from middle class! Her father was and owner of large drugstore in St.Petersburg before revolution.
In the spirit of the OP which proves nothing........and as William Shakespeare said in a play, Nothing shall come of nothing, I speak anon...King Lear..It's like the Communist Manifesto, the Bible, Mein Kamph, they suck, they are dry, philosophical moments I don't feel the propaganda lifting my spirit....I'd rather be reading IRS laws....Those can be eye crossers...I have, yet feel the need to wretch...Just wondering.....have you read her books?
So....you have strong feelings based on ignorance?
It is one of the benefits of being a Liberal....you never have to read anything, or even know anything.
A real time saver.
So you rushed out to this thread to proclaim you know nothing?
Excellent.
So even though you claim you have had your rights trodden upon here in the US, you can't state how you have been so terribly denied any liberties and freedoms. Rather, you change the narrative with what you see as cleaver ad hominem, but are nothing but signs of immaturity.At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
Chica, tell us all PRECISELY what liberties and freedoms you have personally lost here in the US having origins in the war torn Korean peninsula. You've made this claim multiple times, but you never specifically relate the rights and privileges, of which you have been deprived, denied or lost after arrival in this Country. Instead, you imply only vague references depicting other political thoughts and philosophies which are anathema here as the basis of your assertions, but which are part of life in the area of your heritage. So tell us about your lost rights and privileges as you see them so they may be examined objectively for their validity.
Are you admitting that you are a communist?
Where did I claim that, liar?
I claim you are a communist without recognizing it.
And I'm proving it.
But they keep that bikini body ready all winter long.....Are we starving to death? According to PC, the US is a communist country.
If it wasn't for the evil, socialist, food stamps thousands of people would be indeed be starving under the holy "free" market rules
Tonight on Fox news, the starving Swedes...
You say COmmunism, then at the bottom it says Socialism. Er...
Clean off your specs.
The OP explains:
You're running out of original crackpot ideas.
There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
Meaning you have to admit that the OP is 100% accurate.
Gracias.
Communism, socialism and liberalism - good company... Add here a feodalism, it based at a faith in government too... :
Welcome to the board, Sbiker.
What do you mean, 'good company'?
I know of no such term as 'feodalism.'
Feudalism. Sorry for my spelling.
I mean, if you could see a bloody battles between communists and liberals here, you should not combine this two different things.
Liberalism - is priority of individualism over the society. In fact, people cannot live in society and feel free of it, so in practice liberalism is a kind of parasitism of some people on others.
Communism, in ideal - is something like "superdemocracy" - a dictatorship of working majority. Without rules of defence of some minority groups in society. It's a reason of hate of communism from some different kind of people...
LOL!!! You're the complete opposite of accurate. You couldn't possibly be more incorrect and wrong
To be followed by a documentary entitled "Retards that believe Sweden is a socialist country"....Are we starving to death? According to PC, the US is a communist country.
If it wasn't for the evil, socialist, food stamps thousands of people would be indeed be starving under the holy "free" market rules
Tonight on Fox news, the starving Swedes...
So? The largest contiguous empire in the world was held by people by China, the Mongols, shouldn't we be fearing them also, I mean, at anytime they could go back to reconquering their old empire...In the spirit of the OP which proves nothing........and as William Shakespeare said in a play, Nothing shall come of nothing, I speak anon...King Lear..It's like the Communist Manifesto, the Bible, Mein Kamph, they suck, they are dry, philosophical moments I don't feel the propaganda lifting my spirit....I'd rather be reading IRS laws....Those can be eye crossers...I have, yet feel the need to wretch...
So....you have strong feelings based on ignorance?
It is one of the benefits of being a Liberal....you never have to read anything, or even know anything.
A real time saver.
So you rushed out to this thread to proclaim you know nothing?
Excellent.
I prove everything I say.
More?
Watch this:
4. The sextuplets, Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, Fascism, Progressivism, Nazism, were born in Germany.....birthed by the philosopher Hegel.
a. "...the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.'" Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (page 144)
b. "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" ("The community comes before the individual") concretizes the collectivist belief that individuals have no rights and that "the greater good" is the only standard of value. Under such a system, man is not an end to himself, only a tool to be sacrificed for the Führer, autocrat or ruling mob.
Only capitalism regards man as a sovereign individual with an inalienable right to his own life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Government recognition and protection of individual rights is the hallmark of a moral, peaceful, productive society.
Sipsey Street Irregulars: The lie before the crime. "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" ("The community comes before the individual")
As so many Liberals deny that they are essential the same as communists....here is an amazingly similar statement from a member of the god of Democrat's....Franklin Roosevelt's commissariat:
5. Notice the same words from a modern American Democrat, and Franklin Roosevelt supporter, of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.” From a speech delivered on the Senate floorMay 14, 1943 Happy Chandler’s dangerous statism
In what way is this Democrat's pronouncement any different from those of Mussolini, Stalin, or Hitler....????
In the spirit of the OP which proves nothing........and as William Shakespeare said in a play, Nothing shall come of nothing, I speak anon...King Lear..It's like the Communist Manifesto, the Bible, Mein Kamph, they suck, they are dry, philosophical moments I don't feel the propaganda lifting my spirit....I'd rather be reading IRS laws....Those can be eye crossers...I have, yet feel the need to wretch...
So....you have strong feelings based on ignorance?
It is one of the benefits of being a Liberal....you never have to read anything, or even know anything.
A real time saver.
So you rushed out to this thread to proclaim you know nothing?
Excellent.
I prove everything I say.
More?
Watch this:
4. The sextuplets, Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, Fascism, Progressivism, Nazism, were born in Germany.....birthed by the philosopher Hegel.
a. "...the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.'" Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (page 144)
b. "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" ("The community comes before the individual") concretizes the collectivist belief that individuals have no rights and that "the greater good" is the only standard of value. Under such a system, man is not an end to himself, only a tool to be sacrificed for the Führer, autocrat or ruling mob.
Only capitalism regards man as a sovereign individual with an inalienable right to his own life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Government recognition and protection of individual rights is the hallmark of a moral, peaceful, productive society.
Sipsey Street Irregulars: The lie before the crime. "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" ("The community comes before the individual")
As so many Liberals deny that they are essential the same as communists....here is an amazingly similar statement from a member of the god of Democrat's....Franklin Roosevelt's commissariat:
5. Notice the same words from a modern American Democrat, and Franklin Roosevelt supporter, of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.” From a speech delivered on the Senate floorMay 14, 1943 Happy Chandler’s dangerous statism
In what way is this Democrat's pronouncement any different from those of Mussolini, Stalin, or Hitler....????
