Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If we cannot find a way to replace non-renewable resources with renewable forms, we're toast. We have to stop developing farmland into suburbs or highrise apartments. If we don't limit population, nature will do it for us.
Good point. And I think we see that all the time, with major earthquakes, floods, famine, etc., that Mother Nature wipes out everything in the path of destruction with one fell swoop. Too bad that it has to hurt so bad, though. Just like God, Mother Nature doesn't consider pain as a factor in regulating life.
Ironic as well that the articles author promoting a limit of 1 child, is a mother of 2.
[
Sterilization won't ever happen in the United States
Maybe you are subscriber. Thanks for nothing.Your first link just took me to a dead end with a bing popup. I couldn't view the article.
see if you can find a kid to help you.
i didn't have a problem.
If we don't limit population, nature will do it for us.
Childless people are to be applauded. They sacrifice the desire to have children and to create a safety net for themselves in their old age for the cause of saving the planet from over population.The reason for human life, if there really is any, is much more than improving the gene pool.no strawman. what use to childless people serve?
they don't help to improve the gene pool, which is the reason for human life.
if the goal is population reduction, why should euthanasia not be considered?
Euthanasia should be considered, but only if the person in question has requested it themselves.
So back to proving that I am a facist because I believe we need to stop encouraging people to have too many kids. What you got?
childless people are too selfish to sacrifice their own comfort for the overall good of the species, therefore they should be euthanized.
seems pretty simple to me.
Agreed, what are your thoughts on how to limit population?If we cannot find a way to replace non-renewable resources with renewable forms, we're toast. We have to stop developing farmland into suburbs or highrise apartments. If we don't limit population, nature will do it for us.
Would you mind C&Ping the article into a post?☭proletarian☭;1802122 said:Maybe you are subscriber. Thanks for nothing.see if you can find a kid to help you.
i didn't have a problem.
Works here
," writes Canadian journalist Diane Francis, mother of two.
There is not an overpopulation problem. The problem with this world is there are too many dicks that dont care about others. And im not talking about genitalia.
as for renewable energy. Im still not convinced that oil isnt a renewable energy.
☭proletarian☭;1802129 said:Agreed, what are your thoughts on how to limit population?If we cannot find a way to replace non-renewable resources with renewable forms, we're toast. We have to stop developing farmland into suburbs or highrise apartments. If we don't limit population, nature will do it for us.
Make condoms available, don't let people use their kids live off the people's tax dollar, and teach high schooleers about avoiding pregnancy (bnot being whores, the pill, etc).
Make people be responsible for their children and we'll be fine. We had no problems for the last 6000 years.
There is not an overpopulation problem. The problem with this world is there are too many dicks that dont care about others. And im not talking about genitalia.
as for renewable energy. Im still not convinced that oil isnt a renewable energy.
"Make people"??? Sure. You've entered the dark arena where you'll find more libertarians than you might care to take on. They strongly believe that people shouldn't be "made" to do anything.
"oil" as an energy source will never become obsolete,
You make many false assumptions concerning advocates for population control and how they live their lives. Methinks you are one who thinks he/she is "Superior".I have but one comment on all those who support this quasi-Eugenics method of population control so popular among the likes of David Rockefeller, you are aware of the last time these sorts of things were instituted on a massive scale and the end result of that yes? If not let me, me give you a little reminder.
World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history. Over 60 million people were killed. The tables below give a detailed country-by-country count of human losses.
World War II casualties - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So now in order to make ourselves appear educated and smarter than those that came before us, we wrap the same old Eugenics garbage inside the Global Climate change debate. I wonder is all those that advocate this nonsense will be the first to go to the clinic to have themselves fixed to save the planet or is that they wish it upon others because if the "Superior" class they belong too? In fact if you wish people to have a better life, then start with your own, and then advcocate for uplifting the millions upon millions living in poverty and advocate for education and standards of livings that equal our own rather than , thinking because we are so superior we can tell the rest of the world when and how they can procreate.
Is that so?No, frist of all I don't feel the need to preface any debates calling into question peoples character, so again tell me who is acting "Superior"?
I wonder is all those that advocate this nonsense will be the first to go to the clinic to have themselves fixed to save the planet or is that they wish it upon others because if the "Superior" class they belong too?
Further if you wish to engage me in a debate in the future, I suggest, you do not preface any of your statements with demeaning comments as I have given you the courtesy of respecting your opinion and if you cannot do the same with mine, without responding in an adult manner, then do not feel the need in the future to engage me in debate.
