- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,180
- 185
- 85
Well K-Western, it's your moment of truth.
Will you sink into the silly CT abyss with this board's "special people" (KooKoomojo, 9/11HandJob) or step up to reality with the norms? It's your choice.
Enjoy.
Sorry haven't been paying attention to much to the thread that I started (lol). After a few days of spotty research/interest on the subject, I must say that there are some compelling points being made on both sides. However, the ONE thing that remains unexplained (in my opinion) is how in the could the explosives be "set" without anyone noticing. I don't think it's reasonable to think all the explosives were planted the day of the collapse, and this remains as my "make or break" argument. If this can't be explained, I don't think I can accept the demolition argument.
To my knowledge there weren't any witnesses who reported drilling/loud noises in the weeks leading up to 9/11 (and there were a SHIT-TON of people working in this building), but perhaps I'm wrong?
Anyways, until someone can provide evidence of this occurring, or some compelling explanation as to why no one heard the explosives being set, I'mma have to side with the people who believe in the natural collapse of the building. That's my position as of now, but like I said I'm an open minded person open for debate.
Dont need prep if you dont mind spending the extra money, only need rubber bands to hold charges on, and thermate cutters are nearly silent, and its a federal offense to look in other peoples deliveries, and several people had the skin blown off parts of their body from explosions that no one heard according to you.
ok....next salvo of dumb assed noob questions.
Last edited: