alpine
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 3,535
- 809
- 130
I already stated this back on page one of this thread at post 3
I haven't disputed a warming trend, what make you think otherwise?
ok, lets go to the original point then...
denial of the stupid:
in the beginning: "what warming, you guys are delusional..."
10 years later: "ahhh, that warming, pfff, thats not man made, its normal..."
another 10 years: "ahh ok, we may have an impact on it but not that much, cmon..."
now you can brain fart as much as you like and that other guy can smell it as much as he likes...
LOL,
you again avoided a post 32 refuting your "is it warming or not" crap, as I showed that myself the author and ReinyDays NEVER disputed the warming trend. Told you at post 3 this, which you failed to learn:
I haven't disputed a warming trend, what make you think otherwise?
Your Strawman fallacy argument is boring and stupid. It doesn't pertain to the threads topic at all, which is about Prediction/projection failures, that were made many years ago.
You ran off to a pile of shit Guardian article (post 2) about Hansen's 1988 modeling scenarios as being very close to the temperature range, yet they used Scenario B, which is stupid as hell since that is based on NO more CO2 emission increase from 1988 onwards, as shown here:
scenario B has emission rates approximately fixed at current rates
In post 16, I posted this:
1. [Scenario A assumes continued growth rates of trace gas emissions typical of the past 20 years, i.e., about 1.5% yr^-1 emission growth;
That means from 1968-1988 time frame, but anyone who bother to pay attention as the author did in post 16 showed:
View attachment 431376
Emissions grew upward at a greater rate than 1.5% since 1988, it was shown to be 1.9%.from 1988 to 2017. Since Scenario A is the ONLY scenario that allowed for CO2 growth into the future (from 1988) of the three he posted, it is the ONLY one to examine critically, the other two are not worth examining anymore since there is ZERO to reduction of CO2 emissions in them.
Scenario A modeling is a big failure:
View attachment 431381
It is obvious that Dr. Hansen's 1988 3 modeling scenarios are 100% failures.
You are stupid as shit,
good thing you are at the 2nd stage already...
i am glad for you...
i know plenty of morons still couldnt make it this far...
3rd stage will be when you admit the co2 is the main cause of the warming trend and humans controlling emissions will allow the climate extremes stay in our comfort zone...
and let me know when you get there...
Ha ha ha, you are making a total fool of yourself here, not even trying to defend the indefensible of your foolish dead on arrival Guardian bullshit anymore since YOU know you can't address the details of my postings, since it zooms waaaaay over your science illiterate brain.
Thank you for your hilarious capitulation.
Cheers.
thank you for admitting the global warming is real and happening as we speak...
you can play and fart in the details as much as you like now...