Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Cause when we had a Democrat House, Senate, and presidency they really "worked" with the other side...or perhaps they shoved a socialist health care bill down the throats of the American people that caused far more people off their health care plans, while increasing its cost dramatically. Which is one of the many reasons why in the eight years of Obama, the Dems lost the House, Senate, and finally the presidency.Same trash talking occured before the 2016 elections. Who will you guys whine about this time when you get you asses kicked again? Russian content farmers? LOL.Your chance to turn the House and Senate came and went in 2016. Now it's the Left that is more vulnerable in both the Senate and the House. You guys are due for a major shellacking in 2018.
Facing the truth of what happened in Virginia and a few other elections does not make you a leftist. It is Republicans who are vulnerable in the House. They have gone against the will of the voters constantly. Voters do not support Republican plans for healthcare. That will likely play a major role in 2018.It is Republicans who likely will be on the defensive.
We have data to look at this time. In the Philadelphia suburbs, Democrats were elected in local races which had never happened before. Trump won these suburbs in 2016. I did not vote for Clinton or Trump but I believe we need to force both parties to work together. If that means a Democrat House then so be it.
Sorry, but the ACA did not throw off more people than it gained.
Most health insurance policies last for a year. Insurance companies routinely cancel policies & offer replacements.,
Just how dishonest are you people?
Cause when we had a Democrat House, Senate, and presidency they really "worked" with the other side...or perhaps they shoved a socialist health care bill down the throats of the American people that caused far more people off their health care plans, while increasing its cost dramatically. Which is one of the many reasons why in the eight years of Obama, the Dems lost the House, Senate, and finally the presidency.Same trash talking occured before the 2016 elections. Who will you guys whine about this time when you get you asses kicked again? Russian content farmers? LOL.Facing the truth of what happened in Virginia and a few other elections does not make you a leftist. It is Republicans who are vulnerable in the House. They have gone against the will of the voters constantly. Voters do not support Republican plans for healthcare. That will likely play a major role in 2018.It is Republicans who likely will be on the defensive.
We have data to look at this time. In the Philadelphia suburbs, Democrats were elected in local races which had never happened before. Trump won these suburbs in 2016. I did not vote for Clinton or Trump but I believe we need to force both parties to work together. If that means a Democrat House then so be it.
Sorry, but the ACA did not throw off more people than it gained.
Most health insurance policies last for a year. Insurance companies routinely cancel policies & offer replacements.,
Just how dishonest are you people?
Put down the coolaid, hack.
Another 25 million ObamaCare victims
http://nypost.com/2014/01/14/another-25-million-obamacare-victims/
At Least 3.5 Million Americans Have Now Had Their Health Insurance Policies Canceled Thanks To Obamacare
More Than 1 Million in Obamacare Are Set to Lose Plans as Insurers Quit
I Have news, Your stupids, America hating party runs Congress. The dumbasses can't decide among themselves what to do.personally I don't care what you call it, repeal, replace, repair, update...the two sides, especially the Dems that created this monstrosity called the ACA, need to get together and fix the disaster they forced upon the American people.The ACA to be replaced with what? A great program, health MATTERS.
You're the fucking idiot who doesn't realize that due to the ACA, millions could not afford the increase in healthcare costs, or couldn't find a doctor or hospital that accepted their insurance.Cause when we had a Democrat House, Senate, and presidency they really "worked" with the other side...or perhaps they shoved a socialist health care bill down the throats of the American people that caused far more people off their health care plans, while increasing its cost dramatically. Which is one of the many reasons why in the eight years of Obama, the Dems lost the House, Senate, and finally the presidency.Same trash talking occured before the 2016 elections. Who will you guys whine about this time when you get you asses kicked again? Russian content farmers? LOL.
We have data to look at this time. In the Philadelphia suburbs, Democrats were elected in local races which had never happened before. Trump won these suburbs in 2016. I did not vote for Clinton or Trump but I believe we need to force both parties to work together. If that means a Democrat House then so be it.
Sorry, but the ACA did not throw off more people than it gained.
Most health insurance policies last for a year. Insurance companies routinely cancel policies & offer replacements.,
Just how dishonest are you people?
Put down the coolaid, hack.
Another 25 million ObamaCare victims
http://nypost.com/2014/01/14/another-25-million-obamacare-victims/
At Least 3.5 Million Americans Have Now Had Their Health Insurance Policies Canceled Thanks To Obamacare
More Than 1 Million in Obamacare Are Set to Lose Plans as Insurers Quit
You fucking idiot. Losing your insurance means you go from having coverage to not being able to get any coverage.
When your policy is cancelled but a replacement offered, it is not losing your coverage.
You are dumber tha shit.
That's your problem, my own rates have increased 50% and initially all the hospitals and doctors in my area weren't accepting my pre ACA insurance. And there are millions that suffered the same lie of affordability and "if you like your doctor..." So fuck you and your socialist anti American party.I Have news, Your stupids, America hating party runs Congress. The dumbasses can't decide among themselves what to do.personally I don't care what you call it, repeal, replace, repair, update...the two sides, especially the Dems that created this monstrosity called the ACA, need to get together and fix the disaster they forced upon the American people.The ACA to be replaced with what? A great program, health MATTERS.
Your stupid party had from 1995 through 2006 to come up with a health care plan. They didn't bother to try.
So fuck you & your stupid ignorant party. I love the ACA.
That's your problem, my own rates have increased 50% and initially all the hospitals and doctors in my area weren't accepting my pre ACA insurance. And there are millions that suffered the same lie of affordability and "if you like your doctor..." So fuck you and your socialist anti American party.I Have news, Your stupids, America hating party runs Congress. The dumbasses can't decide among themselves what to do.personally I don't care what you call it, repeal, replace, repair, update...the two sides, especially the Dems that created this monstrosity called the ACA, need to get together and fix the disaster they forced upon the American people.The ACA to be replaced with what? A great program, health MATTERS.
Your stupid party had from 1995 through 2006 to come up with a health care plan. They didn't bother to try.
So fuck you & your stupid ignorant party. I love the ACA.
You're the fucking idiot who doesn't realize that due to the ACA, millions could not afford the increase in healthcare costs, or couldn't find a doctor or hospital that accepted their insurance.Cause when we had a Democrat House, Senate, and presidency they really "worked" with the other side...or perhaps they shoved a socialist health care bill down the throats of the American people that caused far more people off their health care plans, while increasing its cost dramatically. Which is one of the many reasons why in the eight years of Obama, the Dems lost the House, Senate, and finally the presidency.We have data to look at this time. In the Philadelphia suburbs, Democrats were elected in local races which had never happened before. Trump won these suburbs in 2016. I did not vote for Clinton or Trump but I believe we need to force both parties to work together. If that means a Democrat House then so be it.
Sorry, but the ACA did not throw off more people than it gained.
Most health insurance policies last for a year. Insurance companies routinely cancel policies & offer replacements.,
Just how dishonest are you people?
Put down the coolaid, hack.
Another 25 million ObamaCare victims
http://nypost.com/2014/01/14/another-25-million-obamacare-victims/
At Least 3.5 Million Americans Have Now Had Their Health Insurance Policies Canceled Thanks To Obamacare
More Than 1 Million in Obamacare Are Set to Lose Plans as Insurers Quit
You fucking idiot. Losing your insurance means you go from having coverage to not being able to get any coverage.
When your policy is cancelled but a replacement offered, it is not losing your coverage.
You are dumber tha shit.
There are more red small states tan blue ones. My God, do you ever get anything right?There are small blue states as well, dipweed, however not as many electoral votes as the blue more populous states such as CA and NY. Which is why the electoral system is a more fair and just system, the county AS A WHOLE isn't held hostage to a monopoly of highly populous states that are aligned with one party or another.Trump did indicate that's it's far harder for Republicans to win the electoral college because Dems always start with a few states with the greatest number of electoral votes (CA, NY etc.) in their back pockets. Winning the popular vote would have been far easier than winning the electoral, considering Trump had to flip a few states that had not turned red in decades.Just pointing out the quality of your posts. It was your orange buddy that claimed he won the popular vote. When you lose the popular vote, you can't claim a mandate.When all is lost they start with the personal insults and pretending that presidential elections in the US haven't been based on an electoral system for the last two hundred years.Imbecile.... look at how you have to switch your argument from how the people rejected Hillary to how she lost because of the electoral vote. That alone should clue you in as to just how retarded your position is. Sadly, you lack the ability to comprehend that.
You are as fucking stupid as the moron Trump.
The smaller states have an advantage in the EC.
The ACA is for people with very low income or near poverty levels (perhaps you), which most good hostipals and doctors do not accept. What you commie anti American fascistic Dems don't realize is you can pass all the socialist regulations you want, but the government cannot FORCE a physician or hospital to serve anybody, operate at a loss, or get paid less than they think they should be.That's your problem, my own rates have increased 50% and initially all the hospitals and doctors in my area weren't accepting my pre ACA insurance. And there are millions that suffered the same lie of affordability and "if you like your doctor..." So fuck you and your socialist anti American party.I Have news, Your stupids, America hating party runs Congress. The dumbasses can't decide among themselves what to do.personally I don't care what you call it, repeal, replace, repair, update...the two sides, especially the Dems that created this monstrosity called the ACA, need to get together and fix the disaster they forced upon the American people.The ACA to be replaced with what? A great program, health MATTERS.
Your stupid party had from 1995 through 2006 to come up with a health care plan. They didn't bother to try.
So fuck you & your stupid ignorant party. I love the ACA.
You do know that there is no such thing as ACA insurance, right? You buy a policy.
You are too God damn stupid to know how the exchanges work & the subsidies that with them.
Prior to the ACA, premiums rose double digits every year. This has slowed under the ACA.
AS for keeping your doctor, if you were so stupid to choose a plan that did h=not include your doctor, that is on you.
You are lying. What is a pre ACA policy?
The subsidies make these policies affordable.
How about you get informed before posting here. It might prevent you from looking like such an ass.
Again the dumb hack shows his ignorance by not knowing the established fact that Democrats have an automatic advantage in the electoral college. Which is why Trump's victory was even more significant.There are more red small states tan blue ones. My God, do you ever get anything right?There are small blue states as well, dipweed, however not as many electoral votes as the blue more populous states such as CA and NY. Which is why the electoral system is a more fair and just system, the county AS A WHOLE isn't held hostage to a monopoly of highly populous states that are aligned with one party or another.Trump did indicate that's it's far harder for Republicans to win the electoral college because Dems always start with a few states with the greatest number of electoral votes (CA, NY etc.) in their back pockets. Winning the popular vote would have been far easier than winning the electoral, considering Trump had to flip a few states that had not turned red in decades.Just pointing out the quality of your posts. It was your orange buddy that claimed he won the popular vote. When you lose the popular vote, you can't claim a mandate.When all is lost they start with the personal insults and pretending that presidential elections in the US haven't been based on an electoral system for the last two hundred years.
You are as fucking stupid as the moron Trump.
The smaller states have an advantage in the EC.
The ACA is for people with very low income or near poverty levels (perhaps you), which most good hostipals and doctors do not accept. What you commie anti American fascistic Dems don't realize is you can pass all the socialist regulations you want, but the government cannot FORCE a physician or hospital to serve anybody, operate at a loss, or get paid less than they think they should be.That's your problem, my own rates have increased 50% and initially all the hospitals and doctors in my area weren't accepting my pre ACA insurance. And there are millions that suffered the same lie of affordability and "if you like your doctor..." So fuck you and your socialist anti American party.I Have news, Your stupids, America hating party runs Congress. The dumbasses can't decide among themselves what to do.personally I don't care what you call it, repeal, replace, repair, update...the two sides, especially the Dems that created this monstrosity called the ACA, need to get together and fix the disaster they forced upon the American people.The ACA to be replaced with what? A great program, health MATTERS.
Your stupid party had from 1995 through 2006 to come up with a health care plan. They didn't bother to try.
So fuck you & your stupid ignorant party. I love the ACA.
You do know that there is no such thing as ACA insurance, right? You buy a policy.
You are too God damn stupid to know how the exchanges work & the subsidies that with them.
Prior to the ACA, premiums rose double digits every year. This has slowed under the ACA.
AS for keeping your doctor, if you were so stupid to choose a plan that did h=not include your doctor, that is on you.
You are lying. What is a pre ACA policy?
The subsidies make these policies affordable.
How about you get informed before posting here. It might prevent you from looking like such an ass.
https://health.usnews.com/health-ne...2013/10/30/top-hospitals-opt-out-of-obamacare
Top Hospitals Opt Out of Obamacare
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...itals-wont-accept-obamacare-marketplace-plans
Doctors, Hospitals Say 'No' to Obamacare Plans
Opinion | Sorry, We Don’t Take Obamacare
Got Obamacare insurance. Can't find doctors.
Again the dumb hack shows his ignorance by not knowing the established fact that Democrats have an automatic advantage in the electoral college. Which is why Trump's victory was even more significant.There are more red small states tan blue ones. My God, do you ever get anything right?There are small blue states as well, dipweed, however not as many electoral votes as the blue more populous states such as CA and NY. Which is why the electoral system is a more fair and just system, the county AS A WHOLE isn't held hostage to a monopoly of highly populous states that are aligned with one party or another.Trump did indicate that's it's far harder for Republicans to win the electoral college because Dems always start with a few states with the greatest number of electoral votes (CA, NY etc.) in their back pockets. Winning the popular vote would have been far easier than winning the electoral, considering Trump had to flip a few states that had not turned red in decades.Just pointing out the quality of your posts. It was your orange buddy that claimed he won the popular vote. When you lose the popular vote, you can't claim a mandate.
You are as fucking stupid as the moron Trump.
The smaller states have an advantage in the EC.
How the Electoral College favors Democrats and why Republicans must change it
This electoral history, however, is misleading for one very important reason: The Electoral College advantage Democrats now have due to the big blue states.
The Democrat will almost always win the following states: California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Republicans haven't won New York, Oregon, Washington, or Wisconsin since Ronald Reagan's 1984 landslide win.
They haven’t won California, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania since 1988. Those states are worth 183 electoral votes. Thus, the Democrat likely enters the 2016 election with a base of 242 electoral votes.
In 2016 race, an electoral college edge for Democrats
No matter whom Republicans nominate to face Hillary Rodham Clinton in November 2016, that candidate will start at a disadvantage. It’s not polling, Clinton’s deep résumé or the improving state of the economy. It’s the electoral college.
The ACA is for people with very low income or near poverty levels (perhaps you), which most good hostipals and doctors do not accept. What you commie anti American fascistic Dems don't realize is you can pass all the socialist regulations you want, but the government cannot FORCE a physician or hospital to serve anybody, operate at a loss, or get paid less than they think they should be.That's your problem, my own rates have increased 50% and initially all the hospitals and doctors in my area weren't accepting my pre ACA insurance. And there are millions that suffered the same lie of affordability and "if you like your doctor..." So fuck you and your socialist anti American party.I Have news, Your stupids, America hating party runs Congress. The dumbasses can't decide among themselves what to do.personally I don't care what you call it, repeal, replace, repair, update...the two sides, especially the Dems that created this monstrosity called the ACA, need to get together and fix the disaster they forced upon the American people.
Your stupid party had from 1995 through 2006 to come up with a health care plan. They didn't bother to try.
So fuck you & your stupid ignorant party. I love the ACA.
You do know that there is no such thing as ACA insurance, right? You buy a policy.
You are too God damn stupid to know how the exchanges work & the subsidies that with them.
Prior to the ACA, premiums rose double digits every year. This has slowed under the ACA.
AS for keeping your doctor, if you were so stupid to choose a plan that did h=not include your doctor, that is on you.
You are lying. What is a pre ACA policy?
The subsidies make these policies affordable.
How about you get informed before posting here. It might prevent you from looking like such an ass.
https://health.usnews.com/health-ne...2013/10/30/top-hospitals-opt-out-of-obamacare
Top Hospitals Opt Out of Obamacare
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...itals-wont-accept-obamacare-marketplace-plans
Doctors, Hospitals Say 'No' to Obamacare Plans
Opinion | Sorry, We Don’t Take Obamacare
Got Obamacare insurance. Can't find doctors.
A family of 4 with income of $97K could quality for a subsidy.
A single person making $47K could quality.
Not near poverty levels at all.
Again, Shut The Fuck Up & get informed.
My God people.
Policies have provider networks. You can choose a policy with coverage only within your network or a policy that covers 100% in network & only 50% out of network. Just like you can choose a plan with your doctor in the network or not.
The way it has always been.
You people don't know shit. You never did. Your party let you wallow in a market where premiums rose by double digits or more every year, had pre-existing conditions, and maximum payouts. You were so stupid you were happier than a pig in shit.
Hello again, dickhead, did you bother clicking on the second link? It was actually Leftie controled Washington Post that was explaining prior to the election how Democrats have a built in advantage. I'd tell you not to give up your daytime job, but knowing you're a useless fucking bum living off the govt. it isn't necessary.Again the dumb hack shows his ignorance by not knowing the established fact that Democrats have an automatic advantage in the electoral college. Which is why Trump's victory was even more significant.There are more red small states tan blue ones. My God, do you ever get anything right?There are small blue states as well, dipweed, however not as many electoral votes as the blue more populous states such as CA and NY. Which is why the electoral system is a more fair and just system, the county AS A WHOLE isn't held hostage to a monopoly of highly populous states that are aligned with one party or another.Trump did indicate that's it's far harder for Republicans to win the electoral college because Dems always start with a few states with the greatest number of electoral votes (CA, NY etc.) in their back pockets. Winning the popular vote would have been far easier than winning the electoral, considering Trump had to flip a few states that had not turned red in decades.
You are as fucking stupid as the moron Trump.
The smaller states have an advantage in the EC.
How the Electoral College favors Democrats and why Republicans must change it
This electoral history, however, is misleading for one very important reason: The Electoral College advantage Democrats now have due to the big blue states.
The Democrat will almost always win the following states: California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Republicans haven't won New York, Oregon, Washington, or Wisconsin since Ronald Reagan's 1984 landslide win.
They haven’t won California, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania since 1988. Those states are worth 183 electoral votes. Thus, the Democrat likely enters the 2016 election with a base of 242 electoral votes.
In 2016 race, an electoral college edge for Democrats
No matter whom Republicans nominate to face Hillary Rodham Clinton in November 2016, that candidate will start at a disadvantage. It’s not polling, Clinton’s deep résumé or the improving state of the economy. It’s the electoral college.
Now you think Karl Rove is the know-it-all?
Electoral votes are by the number of House members + the number of Senators. The number of House members is by population.
If we would split up California into 3 states all blue, then this area would have the same number of Representatives but now 6 Senators & hence more votes.
If we took WY & ID & merged them, they would have at most the same number of Representatives but now just two Senators or less votes
People in small states have more pack per electoral votes than larger states.
So Yes, Ksarlo Rove ios an asshole & you miust be too for bel;ieving that POS.
The ACA is for people with very low income or near poverty levels (perhaps you), which most good hostipals and doctors do not accept. What you commie anti American fascistic Dems don't realize is you can pass all the socialist regulations you want, but the government cannot FORCE a physician or hospital to serve anybody, operate at a loss, or get paid less than they think they should be.That's your problem, my own rates have increased 50% and initially all the hospitals and doctors in my area weren't accepting my pre ACA insurance. And there are millions that suffered the same lie of affordability and "if you like your doctor..." So fuck you and your socialist anti American party.I Have news, Your stupids, America hating party runs Congress. The dumbasses can't decide among themselves what to do.
Your stupid party had from 1995 through 2006 to come up with a health care plan. They didn't bother to try.
So fuck you & your stupid ignorant party. I love the ACA.
You do know that there is no such thing as ACA insurance, right? You buy a policy.
You are too God damn stupid to know how the exchanges work & the subsidies that with them.
Prior to the ACA, premiums rose double digits every year. This has slowed under the ACA.
AS for keeping your doctor, if you were so stupid to choose a plan that did h=not include your doctor, that is on you.
You are lying. What is a pre ACA policy?
The subsidies make these policies affordable.
How about you get informed before posting here. It might prevent you from looking like such an ass.
https://health.usnews.com/health-ne...2013/10/30/top-hospitals-opt-out-of-obamacare
Top Hospitals Opt Out of Obamacare
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...itals-wont-accept-obamacare-marketplace-plans
Doctors, Hospitals Say 'No' to Obamacare Plans
Opinion | Sorry, We Don’t Take Obamacare
Got Obamacare insurance. Can't find doctors.
A family of 4 with income of $97K could quality for a subsidy.
A single person making $47K could quality.
Not near poverty levels at all.
Again, Shut The Fuck Up & get informed.
My God people.
Policies have provider networks. You can choose a policy with coverage only within your network or a policy that covers 100% in network & only 50% out of network. Just like you can choose a plan with your doctor in the network or not.
The way it has always been.
You people don't know shit. You never did. Your party let you wallow in a market where premiums rose by double digits or more every year, had pre-existing conditions, and maximum payouts. You were so stupid you were happier than a pig in shit.
Here we go, proof of millions of Americans losing their doctors, hospitals, and facing dramatic increases in health care costs as a result of the ACA, and you still ramble the same Leftie talking points, not giving a shit about how it affected people's lives.
And you guys wonder why you lost the election? LOL
The advantage was the candidaste younstupid fguivckl.Hello again, dickhead, did you bother clicking on the second link? It was actually Leftie controled Washington Post that was explaining prior to the election how Democrats have a built in advantage. I'd tell you not to give up your daytime job, but knowing you're a useless fucking bum living off the govt. it isn't necessary.Again the dumb hack shows his ignorance by not knowing the established fact that Democrats have an automatic advantage in the electoral college. Which is why Trump's victory was even more significant.There are more red small states tan blue ones. My God, do you ever get anything right?There are small blue states as well, dipweed, however not as many electoral votes as the blue more populous states such as CA and NY. Which is why the electoral system is a more fair and just system, the county AS A WHOLE isn't held hostage to a monopoly of highly populous states that are aligned with one party or another.You are as fucking stupid as the moron Trump.
The smaller states have an advantage in the EC.
How the Electoral College favors Democrats and why Republicans must change it
This electoral history, however, is misleading for one very important reason: The Electoral College advantage Democrats now have due to the big blue states.
The Democrat will almost always win the following states: California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Republicans haven't won New York, Oregon, Washington, or Wisconsin since Ronald Reagan's 1984 landslide win.
They haven’t won California, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania since 1988. Those states are worth 183 electoral votes. Thus, the Democrat likely enters the 2016 election with a base of 242 electoral votes.
In 2016 race, an electoral college edge for Democrats
No matter whom Republicans nominate to face Hillary Rodham Clinton in November 2016, that candidate will start at a disadvantage. It’s not polling, Clinton’s deep résumé or the improving state of the economy. It’s the electoral college.
Now you think Karl Rove is the know-it-all?
Electoral votes are by the number of House members + the number of Senators. The number of House members is by population.
If we would split up California into 3 states all blue, then this area would have the same number of Representatives but now 6 Senators & hence more votes.
If we took WY & ID & merged them, they would have at most the same number of Representatives but now just two Senators or less votes
People in small states have more pack per electoral votes than larger states.
So Yes, Ksarlo Rove ios an asshole & you miust be too for bel;ieving that POS.
In 2016 race, an electoral college edge for Democrats
In 2016 race, an electoral college edge for Democrats
No matter whom Republicans nominate to face Hillary Rodham Clinton in November 2016, that candidate will start at a disadvantage. It’s not polling, Clinton’s deep résumé or the improving state of the economy. It’s the electoral college.
Yes, the somewhat arcane — yet remarkably durable — way in which presidential elections are decided tilts toward Democrats in 2016, as documented by nonpartisan political handicapper Nathan Gonzales in a recent edition of the Rothenberg & Gonzales Political Report.
Gonzales notes that if you add up all of the states that are either “safe” for the eventual Democratic nominee or “favor” that nominee, you get 217 electoral votes. (A candidate needs to win 270 to be elected president.) Do the same for states safe or favoring the Republican standard-bearer, per Gonzales’s rankings, and you get just 191 electoral votes.
That Democratic advantage becomes even more pronounced if you add to the party’s total the states that “lean” Democratic, according to Gonzales. Put Pennsylvania (20 electoral votes), Iowa (6) and Nevada (6) into the Democratic column and the party’s electoral vote count surges to 249 — just 21 votes short of winning a third straight presidential race. (Gonzales doesn’t rate any states as “lean Republican.”)
Hee hee...typical Libtard mental case.The advantage was the candidaste younstupid fguivckl.Hello again, dickhead, did you bother clicking on the second link? It was actually Leftie controled Washington Post that was explaining prior to the election how Democrats have a built in advantage. I'd tell you not to give up your daytime job, but knowing you're a useless fucking bum living off the govt. it isn't necessary.Again the dumb hack shows his ignorance by not knowing the established fact that Democrats have an automatic advantage in the electoral college. Which is why Trump's victory was even more significant.There are more red small states tan blue ones. My God, do you ever get anything right?There are small blue states as well, dipweed, however not as many electoral votes as the blue more populous states such as CA and NY. Which is why the electoral system is a more fair and just system, the county AS A WHOLE isn't held hostage to a monopoly of highly populous states that are aligned with one party or another.
How the Electoral College favors Democrats and why Republicans must change it
This electoral history, however, is misleading for one very important reason: The Electoral College advantage Democrats now have due to the big blue states.
The Democrat will almost always win the following states: California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Republicans haven't won New York, Oregon, Washington, or Wisconsin since Ronald Reagan's 1984 landslide win.
They haven’t won California, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania since 1988. Those states are worth 183 electoral votes. Thus, the Democrat likely enters the 2016 election with a base of 242 electoral votes.
In 2016 race, an electoral college edge for Democrats
No matter whom Republicans nominate to face Hillary Rodham Clinton in November 2016, that candidate will start at a disadvantage. It’s not polling, Clinton’s deep résumé or the improving state of the economy. It’s the electoral college.
Now you think Karl Rove is the know-it-all?
Electoral votes are by the number of House members + the number of Senators. The number of House members is by population.
If we would split up California into 3 states all blue, then this area would have the same number of Representatives but now 6 Senators & hence more votes.
If we took WY & ID & merged them, they would have at most the same number of Representatives but now just two Senators or less votes
People in small states have more pack per electoral votes than larger states.
So Yes, Ksarlo Rove ios an asshole & you miust be too for bel;ieving that POS.
In 2016 race, an electoral college edge for Democrats
In 2016 race, an electoral college edge for Democrats
No matter whom Republicans nominate to face Hillary Rodham Clinton in November 2016, that candidate will start at a disadvantage. It’s not polling, Clinton’s deep résumé or the improving state of the economy. It’s the electoral college.
Yes, the somewhat arcane — yet remarkably durable — way in which presidential elections are decided tilts toward Democrats in 2016, as documented by nonpartisan political handicapper Nathan Gonzales in a recent edition of the Rothenberg & Gonzales Political Report.
Gonzales notes that if you add up all of the states that are either “safe” for the eventual Democratic nominee or “favor” that nominee, you get 217 electoral votes. (A candidate needs to win 270 to be elected president.) Do the same for states safe or favoring the Republican standard-bearer, per Gonzales’s rankings, and you get just 191 electoral votes.
That Democratic advantage becomes even more pronounced if you add to the party’s total the states that “lean” Democratic, according to Gonzales. Put Pennsylvania (20 electoral votes), Iowa (6) and Nevada (6) into the Democratic column and the party’s electoral vote count surges to 249 — just 21 votes short of winning a third straight presidential race. (Gonzales doesn’t rate any states as “lean Republican.”)
One thing I love about you Trumpettes, you can't learn anything & keep repeating the exact same stupid shit over & over & over.
Yes, you mental midget, when your hospital or physician refuses your insurance, it increases beyond your ability you've basically lost your health care.The ACA is for people with very low income or near poverty levels (perhaps you), which most good hostipals and doctors do not accept. What you commie anti American fascistic Dems don't realize is you can pass all the socialist regulations you want, but the government cannot FORCE a physician or hospital to serve anybody, operate at a loss, or get paid less than they think they should be.That's your problem, my own rates have increased 50% and initially all the hospitals and doctors in my area weren't accepting my pre ACA insurance. And there are millions that suffered the same lie of affordability and "if you like your doctor..." So fuck you and your socialist anti American party.
You do know that there is no such thing as ACA insurance, right? You buy a policy.
You are too God damn stupid to know how the exchanges work & the subsidies that with them.
Prior to the ACA, premiums rose double digits every year. This has slowed under the ACA.
AS for keeping your doctor, if you were so stupid to choose a plan that did h=not include your doctor, that is on you.
You are lying. What is a pre ACA policy?
The subsidies make these policies affordable.
How about you get informed before posting here. It might prevent you from looking like such an ass.
https://health.usnews.com/health-ne...2013/10/30/top-hospitals-opt-out-of-obamacare
Top Hospitals Opt Out of Obamacare
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...itals-wont-accept-obamacare-marketplace-plans
Doctors, Hospitals Say 'No' to Obamacare Plans
Opinion | Sorry, We Don’t Take Obamacare
Got Obamacare insurance. Can't find doctors.
A family of 4 with income of $97K could quality for a subsidy.
A single person making $47K could quality.
Not near poverty levels at all.
Again, Shut The Fuck Up & get informed.
My God people.
Policies have provider networks. You can choose a policy with coverage only within your network or a policy that covers 100% in network & only 50% out of network. Just like you can choose a plan with your doctor in the network or not.
The way it has always been.
You people don't know shit. You never did. Your party let you wallow in a market where premiums rose by double digits or more every year, had pre-existing conditions, and maximum payouts. You were so stupid you were happier than a pig in shit.
Here we go, proof of millions of Americans losing their doctors, hospitals, and facing dramatic increases in health care costs as a result of the ACA, and you still ramble the same Leftie talking points, not giving a shit about how it affected people's lives.
And you guys wonder why you lost the election? LOL
Because of the ACA? Really?
First of all, no one made anyone buy insurance through the exchanges.
Second, The ACA reduced the growth of premiums
Third, insurance policies typically end at the end of the year. Insurance companies can offer these for renewal or replace them with different policies., This is not losing one's insurance. Losing coverage is no longer being able to buy coverage.
Fourth, you don't even know how the exchanges & subsidies work.
Unlike you, I would not buy a policy that did not include my hospital.Yes, you mental midget, when your hospital or physician refuses your insurance, it increases beyond your ability you've basically lost your health care.The ACA is for people with very low income or near poverty levels (perhaps you), which most good hostipals and doctors do not accept. What you commie anti American fascistic Dems don't realize is you can pass all the socialist regulations you want, but the government cannot FORCE a physician or hospital to serve anybody, operate at a loss, or get paid less than they think they should be.You do know that there is no such thing as ACA insurance, right? You buy a policy.
You are too God damn stupid to know how the exchanges work & the subsidies that with them.
Prior to the ACA, premiums rose double digits every year. This has slowed under the ACA.
AS for keeping your doctor, if you were so stupid to choose a plan that did h=not include your doctor, that is on you.
You are lying. What is a pre ACA policy?
The subsidies make these policies affordable.
How about you get informed before posting here. It might prevent you from looking like such an ass.
https://health.usnews.com/health-ne...2013/10/30/top-hospitals-opt-out-of-obamacare
Top Hospitals Opt Out of Obamacare
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...itals-wont-accept-obamacare-marketplace-plans
Doctors, Hospitals Say 'No' to Obamacare Plans
Opinion | Sorry, We Don’t Take Obamacare
Got Obamacare insurance. Can't find doctors.
A family of 4 with income of $97K could quality for a subsidy.
A single person making $47K could quality.
Not near poverty levels at all.
Again, Shut The Fuck Up & get informed.
My God people.
Policies have provider networks. You can choose a policy with coverage only within your network or a policy that covers 100% in network & only 50% out of network. Just like you can choose a plan with your doctor in the network or not.
The way it has always been.
You people don't know shit. You never did. Your party let you wallow in a market where premiums rose by double digits or more every year, had pre-existing conditions, and maximum payouts. You were so stupid you were happier than a pig in shit.
Here we go, proof of millions of Americans losing their doctors, hospitals, and facing dramatic increases in health care costs as a result of the ACA, and you still ramble the same Leftie talking points, not giving a shit about how it affected people's lives.
And you guys wonder why you lost the election? LOL
Because of the ACA? Really?
First of all, no one made anyone buy insurance through the exchanges.
Second, The ACA reduced the growth of premiums
Third, insurance policies typically end at the end of the year. Insurance companies can offer these for renewal or replace them with different policies., This is not losing one's insurance. Losing coverage is no longer being able to buy coverage.
Fourth, you don't even know how the exchanges & subsidies work.
You have severe reading comprehension problems. The hospitals and doctors were rejecting people's insurances that they used to accept before. All because of the ACA. Again, the govt. can't FORCE a private business to operate at a loss or lose money.Unlike you, I would not buy a policy that did not include my hospital.Yes, you mental midget, when your hospital or physician refuses your insurance, it increases beyond your ability you've basically lost your health care.The ACA is for people with very low income or near poverty levels (perhaps you), which most good hostipals and doctors do not accept. What you commie anti American fascistic Dems don't realize is you can pass all the socialist regulations you want, but the government cannot FORCE a physician or hospital to serve anybody, operate at a loss, or get paid less than they think they should be.
https://health.usnews.com/health-ne...2013/10/30/top-hospitals-opt-out-of-obamacare
Top Hospitals Opt Out of Obamacare
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...itals-wont-accept-obamacare-marketplace-plans
Doctors, Hospitals Say 'No' to Obamacare Plans
Opinion | Sorry, We Don’t Take Obamacare
Got Obamacare insurance. Can't find doctors.
A family of 4 with income of $97K could quality for a subsidy.
A single person making $47K could quality.
Not near poverty levels at all.
Again, Shut The Fuck Up & get informed.
My God people.
Policies have provider networks. You can choose a policy with coverage only within your network or a policy that covers 100% in network & only 50% out of network. Just like you can choose a plan with your doctor in the network or not.
The way it has always been.
You people don't know shit. You never did. Your party let you wallow in a market where premiums rose by double digits or more every year, had pre-existing conditions, and maximum payouts. You were so stupid you were happier than a pig in shit.
Here we go, proof of millions of Americans losing their doctors, hospitals, and facing dramatic increases in health care costs as a result of the ACA, and you still ramble the same Leftie talking points, not giving a shit about how it affected people's lives.
And you guys wonder why you lost the election? LOL
Because of the ACA? Really?
First of all, no one made anyone buy insurance through the exchanges.
Second, The ACA reduced the growth of premiums
Third, insurance policies typically end at the end of the year. Insurance companies can offer these for renewal or replace them with different policies., This is not losing one's insurance. Losing coverage is no longer being able to buy coverage.
Fourth, you don't even know how the exchanges & subsidies work.
The idea you think there are policies sold where there are no providers proves what a dumbasss you are.
