Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,947
- 9,980
- 2,040
No! I am more worried about curing something that is curable.
In other words you will ignore the premise of his suggestion and react to the idea it is an attack of some kind.
I would cure it if it were learned, not if it were genetic. In other words since we are pretty damn sure it is not learned I would not opt for a cure for a genetic mutation that causes no actual harm to the body.
I would "cure" transsexuals or those with both genitalia.
Don't get me wrong I am opposed to the State recognizing Gay unions as marriages and would oppose civil unions as well if the times were not what they are. Civil Unions though are what we should be accepting for gays.
Thankfully, we do have "cures", or at least treatment for genetic errors. They're not perfect but they're getting better and better.
And, of course, we all want equal treatment, marriage equality for all US citizens as guaranteed by our Constitution.