Woulc JFK Still be a Democrat Today?

Woulc JFK Still be a Democrat Today?

No way. Can you imaging a Democrat leader uttering these words?

"It will include an across the board, top to bottom cut in both corporate and personal income taxes"

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVwGIeD9i3I]JFK on Taxes - YouTube[/ame]

How about if Republicans agree we go back to the 1962 tax rates of JFK?

Marginal tax rates of 1963

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/Content/PDF/individual_rates.pdf

People making 40K a year were in the 56% bracket.

I thought you didn't want to raise taxes on the poor.
 
I take that as a challenge to everyone on the Conservative side.

And I gotta recommend you clarify your statement.

Only a fool would allege such a thing and I assume you aren't foolish.

STHU if you can't do better than that.

Your side (the far wack righty nuts) implied JFK would not be a dem today.

You have to offer concrete, verifiable evidence before anyone needs to give you evidence in rebuttal of an unsupported opinion.

You don't get "just once more" when you have not offered anything.

Lol, you don't have the authority to tell anyone jack shit, you fucking moron.

Eat shit, you god damned liar.

If you had anything substantial and intelligent to say, you would not need the insults.
 
No way. Can you imaging a Democrat leader uttering these words?

"It will include an across the board, top to bottom cut in both corporate and personal income taxes"

JFK on Taxes - YouTube

How about if Republicans agree we go back to the 1962 tax rates of JFK?

Marginal tax rates of 1963

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/Content/PDF/individual_rates.pdf

People making 40K a year were in the 56% bracket.

I thought you didn't want to raise taxes on the poor.

40K a year in 1963 was the equivlent to $302,106.58 today.

and frankly, 56% on 300K is pretty reasonable.
 
How about if Republicans agree we go back to the 1962 tax rates of JFK?

Marginal tax rates of 1963

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/Content/PDF/individual_rates.pdf

People making 40K a year were in the 56% bracket.

I thought you didn't want to raise taxes on the poor.

40K a year in 1963 was the equivlent to $302,106.58 today.

and frankly, 56% on 300K is pretty reasonable.

There was no mention in his post of adjusting for inflation.

He said he wanted to go back to the tax rates of 1962

And taking 56% of someone's money is never "reasonable" it's theft.
 
What do you think JFK would be if not a great Democrat? A teapartier? :lol:

I can't remember ever knowing of a Kennedy being associated with any other party.
 
What do you think JFK would be if not a great Democrat? A teapartier? :lol:

I can't remember ever knowing of a Kennedy being associated with any other party.

So you're saying that Kennedy was incapable of thinking for himself and would have to be in lockstep with one political ideology for his entire life when he clearly had his disagreements with that ideology.

IOW you're saying he would have been a hypocrite.

I guess he was not unlike any other politician and maybe now the idolatry of the man can end.
 
What do you think JFK would be if not a great Democrat? A teapartier? :lol:

I can't remember ever knowing of a Kennedy being associated with any other party.

So you're saying that Kennedy was incapable of thinking for himself and would have to be in lockstep with one political ideology for his entire life when he clearly had his disagreements with that ideology.

IOW you're saying he would have been a hypocrite.

I guess he was not unlike any other politician and maybe now the idolatry of the man can end.

Love it when you idiots try to put words into people's mouths. You're not good at it.

I'm saying that JFK was way too smart to ever be a Republican no matter how much you all would love to take credit for him.
 
No way. Can you imaging a Democrat leader uttering these words?

"It will include an across the board, top to bottom cut in both corporate and personal income taxes"

JFK on Taxes - YouTube

How about if Republicans agree we go back to the 1962 tax rates of JFK?

Marginal tax rates of 1963

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/Content/PDF/individual_rates.pdf

People making 40K a year were in the 56% bracket.

I thought you didn't want to raise taxes on the poor.

In 1963, people making $40K a year were rich
 
What do you think JFK would be if not a great Democrat? A teapartier? :lol:

I can't remember ever knowing of a Kennedy being associated with any other party.

So you're saying that Kennedy was incapable of thinking for himself and would have to be in lockstep with one political ideology for his entire life when he clearly had his disagreements with that ideology.

IOW you're saying he would have been a hypocrite.

I guess he was not unlike any other politician and maybe now the idolatry of the man can end.

Love it when you idiots try to put words into people's mouths. You're not good at it.

I'm saying that JFK was way too smart to ever be a Republican no matter how much you all would love to take credit for him.

I love when you idiots assume I am or ever have been a republican.
 
How about if Republicans agree we go back to the 1962 tax rates of JFK?

Marginal tax rates of 1963

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/Content/PDF/individual_rates.pdf

People making 40K a year were in the 56% bracket.

I thought you didn't want to raise taxes on the poor.

In 1963, people making $40K a year were rich

Not what you said.

This is what you said,

How about if Republicans agree we go back to the 1962 tax rates of JFK?
 
So you're saying that Kennedy was incapable of thinking for himself and would have to be in lockstep with one political ideology for his entire life when he clearly had his disagreements with that ideology.

IOW you're saying he would have been a hypocrite.

I guess he was not unlike any other politician and maybe now the idolatry of the man can end.

Love it when you idiots try to put words into people's mouths. You're not good at it.

I'm saying that JFK was way too smart to ever be a Republican no matter how much you all would love to take credit for him.

I love when you idiots assume I am or ever have been a republican.

Sure. At any rate, nobody cares. :cuckoo:
 
Love it when you idiots try to put words into people's mouths. You're not good at it.

I'm saying that JFK was way too smart to ever be a Republican no matter how much you all would love to take credit for him.

I love when you idiots assume I am or ever have been a republican.

Sure. At any rate, nobody cares. :cuckoo:

It's too bad you can't think beyond the 2 party system.

If you could you might be interesting.
 
Marginal tax rates of 1963

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/Content/PDF/individual_rates.pdf

People making 40K a year were in the 56% bracket.

I thought you didn't want to raise taxes on the poor.

In 1963, people making $40K a year were rich

Not what you said.

This is what you said,

How about if Republicans agree we go back to the 1962 tax rates of JFK?

You are the one claiming JFK would be a Republican today

Would todays Republicans settle for a 56% tax rate on $40K?

I think the Teatards would be up in arms....don't you?
 
In 1963, people making $40K a year were rich

Not what you said.

This is what you said,

How about if Republicans agree we go back to the 1962 tax rates of JFK?

You are the one claiming JFK would be a Republican today

Where did I ever say that?
Would todays Republicans settle for a 56% tax rate on $40K?

Don't care. I'm not a republican

I think the Teatards would be up in arms....don't you?

again don't care.
 
STHU if you can't do better than that.

Your side (the far wack righty nuts) implied JFK would not be a dem today.

You have to offer concrete, verifiable evidence before anyone needs to give you evidence in rebuttal of an unsupported opinion.

You don't get "just once more" when you have not offered anything.

Lol, you don't have the authority to tell anyone jack shit, you fucking moron.

Eat shit, you god damned liar.

If you had anything substantial and intelligent to say, you would not need the insults.


JimBowie wants to have an unsupported opinion a fact.

Doesn't work that way. Will never work that way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top