Worst case scenerio is the one the reality is tracking

Why should they pay more? Electricity from wind and solar is cheaper than that from fossil fuels, and far, far cheaper than nuclear. That is why utilities are shutting down coal fired plants that have many years of life left, but it is simply cheaper to build wind and solar than continue to burn coal. And now they are starting to replace gas peaker plants with grid scale storage, batteries and other forms.

costs fall​


.
Natural gas and the energy transition
This story is part of a series exploring the natural gas industry's role and prospects in the energy transition — a globe-spanning movement to cut greenhouse gas emissions across the energy industry.
Advancements in battery storage pose a significant risk to natural gas as the rapid growth of renewable power erodes market share for the fossil fuel in the decades ahead.
In independent system operator territories across the U.S., wind power has become the single largest threat to market share for gas as a cleaner power source as coal and nuclear generation retires. At less than $30/MWh, the levelized costs of wind and solar power have fallen dramatically in recent years, with both technologies continuing to undercut even the cheapest gas-fired generation.
Growth in renewable power has created a supporting role for gas as a backup fuel, balancing the intermittency of wind and solar generation. But rapid advances in lithium-ion battery storage technology have dramatically altered the green-energy landscape.
For years, fast-ramping batteries capable of replacing gas as a grid-balancing resource were out of the money. According to a recent analysis of global battery-storage projects by BloombergNEF, however, lithium-ion batteries are now cheaper than gas peaking plants in much of the world.

At an all-in cost of $132/MWh, a four-hour utility-scale battery is now priced below the global gas-peaker plant average at $173/MWh. Even within the U.S., where gas prices are significantly lower than elsewhere, batteries are now cost-competitive with gas-fired power due in part to state-level clean energy goals and federal tax credits.
Such policies have boosted the competitiveness of renewables in recent years and threaten to undermine the economic viability of new gas-fired power investments, according to Morris Greenberg, S&P Global Platts Analytics senior manager for North American power.

 
Does not look like there is much to be optimistic about concerning global warming and a changing climate.


Oh shit, here we go again.....How much money would it take to save this fucking planet if it could be saved by Progressives? 5 trillion, 10 trillion?
 
Not from what I've been reading.
Be honest,the jab doesnt work,in fact it makes people more susceptible to the 2nd variant.
How about you do some research without using Google.
You mean listen to shit heads like Carlson and Hannity? How about you actually listening to scientists rather than dope heads and conspiracy nuts.
 
Of course, scientists with decades of research under their belt cannot be trusted. So, if you need cancer surgery, get a ditch digger to do it. LOL You know nothing 'Conservatives' are a hoot.
"Scientists" whose "decades of research" create predictions that have never come to pass....Yeah, fuck off.
 
Of course an asshole like you believes what is happening to the victims of the fires, droughts, and floods to be humorous. And more people dead from the Covid than we lost in the Civil due to the lies of Trump is just an absolute scream. The humor of "Conservatives".
Down here in God's country of Florida, we have plenty of rain, great weather and beautiful girls.

Milena-Cardoso-and-Fernanda-Uesler---Bikini-Candids-at-the-Beach-in-Miami--06.jpg
 
Oh shit, here we go again.....How much money would it take to save this fucking planet if it could be saved by Progressives? 5 trillion, 10 trillion?
First of all, no Senator or Representative nor their spouses should be allowed to invest in businesses while serving. However, solar and much of the new tech is an excellent investment.
 
First of all, no Senator or Representative nor their spouses should be allowed to invest in businesses while serving. However, solar and much of the new tech is an excellent investment.
Yeah, especially when you have Senators and Congressrats trying to push 5 trillion dollars into a fucked up industry like solar....But i guess you dont see anything wrong with that do you?
 
Yeah, especially when you have Senators and Congressrats trying to push 5 trillion dollars into a fucked up industry like solar....But i guess you dont see anything wrong with that do you?
LOL Really frosts your agates as to how well solar is doing, doesn't it.


  • The U.S. solar industry had a record year in 2020 despite the coronavirus pandemic, according to a report from the Solar Energy Industries Association and Wood Mackenzie.
  • The report found the industry added a record 19.2 gigawatts of new capacity during 2020, a 43% jump from 2019.
  • By 2030, solar installations are expected to quadruple from current levels.
 
Why should they pay more?

Removing cheaper, reliable energy and replacing it with more expensive, less reliable energy.......of course they'll pay more. DURR.

Electricity from wind and solar is cheaper than that from fossil fuels, and far, far cheaper than nuclear.

Is that why power in California is so cheap? Lots of renewables, little nuclear and fossil fuel?

Is that why power in Illinois is so expensive? No renewables, lots of nuclear and coal?
 
Why should they pay more? Electricity from wind and solar is cheaper than that from fossil fuels, and far, far cheaper than nuclear. That is why utilities are shutting down coal fired plants that have many years of life left, but it is simply cheaper to build wind and solar than continue to burn coal. And now they are starting to replace gas peaker plants with grid scale storage, batteries and other forms.

costs fall​


.
Natural gas and the energy transition
This story is part of a series exploring the natural gas industry's role and prospects in the energy transition — a globe-spanning movement to cut greenhouse gas emissions across the energy industry.
Advancements in battery storage pose a significant risk to natural gas as the rapid growth of renewable power erodes market share for the fossil fuel in the decades ahead.
In independent system operator territories across the U.S., wind power has become the single largest threat to market share for gas as a cleaner power source as coal and nuclear generation retires. At less than $30/MWh, the levelized costs of wind and solar power have fallen dramatically in recent years, with both technologies continuing to undercut even the cheapest gas-fired generation.
Growth in renewable power has created a supporting role for gas as a backup fuel, balancing the intermittency of wind and solar generation. But rapid advances in lithium-ion battery storage technology have dramatically altered the green-energy landscape.
For years, fast-ramping batteries capable of replacing gas as a grid-balancing resource were out of the money. According to a recent analysis of global battery-storage projects by BloombergNEF, however, lithium-ion batteries are now cheaper than gas peaking plants in much of the world.

At an all-in cost of $132/MWh, a four-hour utility-scale battery is now priced below the global gas-peaker plant average at $173/MWh. Even within the U.S., where gas prices are significantly lower than elsewhere, batteries are now cost-competitive with gas-fired power due in part to state-level clean energy goals and federal tax credits.
Such policies have boosted the competitiveness of renewables in recent years and threaten to undermine the economic viability of new gas-fired power investments, according to Morris Greenberg, S&P Global Platts Analytics senior manager for North American power.


Thanks for the link......

Even within the U.S., where gas prices are significantly lower than elsewhere, batteries are now cost-competitive with gas-fired power due in part to state-level clean energy goals and federal tax credits.

They're cost competitive.....if you outlaw alternatives and hand them taxpayer funds? LOL!
Damn, liberals really don't understand economics.
 
Removing cheaper, reliable energy and replacing it with more expensive, less reliable energy.......of course they'll pay more. DURR.

Electricity from wind and solar is cheaper than that from fossil fuels, and far, far cheaper than nuclear.

Is that why power in California is so cheap? Lots of renewables, little nuclear and fossil fuel?

Is that why power in Illinois is so expensive? No renewables, lots of nuclear and coal?
Of the 62.3 million MWh of electricity produced in Oregon in 2019, 62.2% came from renewable sources -- making the state one of only six nationwide where half of all electricity is produced from renewables.Apr 1, 2021


The cost of electricity in Oregon is over 2 cents per kw cheaper than the national average.
 
yawn

In '72 they were claiming that the next ice age was coming.

You warmer clowns have never been right.
Damn, you looney tunes just keep repeating that lie, even when you are shown it is a lies.

1631838499760.png

 
Of the 62.3 million MWh of electricity produced in Oregon in 2019, 62.2% came from renewable sources -- making the state one of only six nationwide where half of all electricity is produced from renewables.Apr 1, 2021


The cost of electricity in Oregon is over 2 cents per kw cheaper than the national average.

Are we building a lot of new hydropower lately?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top