Worldnet Daily accuses wikipedia of being a far left media outlet

[DavidS]

Wikipedia scrubs Obama eligibility

You know the whackos are trying hard when they make THIS item breaking news!

 

[Terry]

Oh My My, this will be a fun read over the next few days.

 

[Article 15]

Main Page - Conservapedia

 

[DiveCon]

Wikipedia scrubs Obama eligibility

You know the whackos are trying hard when they make THIS item breaking news!

as if anyone with common sense needed WND to tell them that
LOL

 

[DiveCon]

Main Page - Conservapedia

i don't get how this is relevant

 

[Article 15]

Main Page - Conservapedia

i don't get how this is relevant

It's a helpful tool for those who think wiki is out to get them.

 

[DiveCon]

Main Page - Conservapedia

i don't get how this is relevant

It's a helpful tool for those who think wiki is out to get them.

wiki being control by libs is an accurate statement
claiming anyone thinks they are "out to get them" is not
LOL
just pointing out that its not a true fair soure is not claiming the other

 

[xsited1]

Wikipedia scrubs Obama eligibility

You know the whackos are trying hard when they make THIS item breaking news!

Where in the link does Worldnet Daily accuse Wikipedia of being a far left media outlet?

 

[Article 15]

i don't get how this is relevant

It's a helpful tool for those who think wiki is out to get them.

wiki being control by libs is an accurate statement
claiming anyone thinks they are "out to get them" is not
LOL
just pointing out that its not a true fair soure is not claiming the other

Meh ...

I don't trust Wiki because anyone can edit it.

Follow the links in the footnotes if you want real sources.

 

[DavidS]

So anything that does not purport a vast right-wing conspiracy-laden theory is a far left media source? It's hilarious. Wikipedia is as neutral as they come! It's a friggin encyclopedia - not a news source!

 

[DiveCon]

It's a helpful tool for those who think wiki is out to get them.

wiki being control by libs is an accurate statement
claiming anyone thinks they are "out to get them" is not
LOL
just pointing out that its not a true fair soure is not claiming the other

Meh ...

I don't trust Wiki because anyone can edit it.

Follow the links in the footnotes if you want real sources.

yup
thats the same way i feel about it
i know i tried to correct some errors on a wiki page and it took 3 times before they finally left it
on the third time i had a link to back it up

 

[DiveCon]

So anything that does not purport a vast right-wing conspiracy-laden theory is a far left media source? It's hilarious. Wikipedia is as neutral as they come! It's a friggin encyclopedia - not a news source!

if you read the actual story, it never claimed what the title here does


btw, this whole BC thing was started by the clinton camp

 

[Father Time]

Main Page - Conservapedia

i don't get how this is relevant

It was started by someone who thought wikipedia was riddled with left wing bias.

Although to counteract this he made a wiki that has a clear as day far right bias. I saw them quote Richard Dawkins talking about Hitler and if you follow their link you'll see it's out of context.

This is why I hate the far left and the far right. They think lying to serve their cause is ok.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It's a helpful tool for those who think wiki is out to get them.

wiki being control by libs is an accurate statement
claiming anyone thinks they are "out to get them" is not
LOL
just pointing out that its not a true fair soure is not claiming the other

Meh ...

I don't trust Wiki because anyone can edit it.

Follow the links in the footnotes if you want real sources.

yeah dont believe half of what they post there cause like you said,they can type in anything they want there.

 

[Sarah G]

You know the whackos are trying hard when they make THIS item breaking news!

They're still writing about Obama and his possibly not being eligibile for the presidency over at WND.

Lunkheads..

 

[manifold]

I can understand deleting the eligibility crap. But why delete the factual statements about Wright and Ayers?

You know, just because WND is a well known peddler of republican propaganda doesn't guarantee that everything they write is bullshit.

 

[Sarah G]

I can understand deleting the eligibility crap. But why delete the factual statements about Wright and Ayers?

You know, just because WND is a well known peddler of republican propaganda doesn't guarantee that everything they write is bullshit.

It certainly doesn't guarantee complete honesty either.

 

[manifold]

I can understand deleting the eligibility crap. But why delete the factual statements about Wright and Ayers?

You know, just because WND is a well known peddler of republican propaganda doesn't guarantee that everything they write is bullshit.

It certainly doesn't guarantee complete honesty either.

I didn't say it did.

But I checked the Obama wikipedia page and couldn't find anything about Ayers either. I find it hard to believe that nobody has attempted to add anything at all about him.

Edit: I actually did find one mention of Wright.

 

[Sarah G]

I can understand deleting the eligibility crap. But why delete the factual statements about Wright and Ayers?

You know, just because WND is a well known peddler of republican propaganda doesn't guarantee that everything they write is bullshit.

It certainly doesn't guarantee complete honesty either.

I didn't say it did.

But I checked the Obama wikipedia page and couldn't find anything about Wright or Ayers either. I find it hard to believe that nobody has attempted to add anything at all about them.

Hasn't the Wright and Ayers thing been done and overdone at this point? Ok, Republicans raised the issues and gave Obama a few rough weeks last summer, both very weak issues for them to have been pounding on for weeks because nothing ever came of it.

I'm sure there are a lot more smears that haven't been included at Wiki as well. WND smears Obama like it is their job... wait...

 

[manifold]

Hasn't the Wright and Ayers thing been done and overdone at this point? Ok, Republicans raised the issues and gave Obama a few rough weeks last summer, both very weak issues for them to have been pounding on for weeks because nothing ever came of it.

That's not the point. The point is that facts are facts.