Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Never mind, I found it myself.
What you claim to be a quote from the Las Vegas Climate Book Index is actually from an article at WUWT.
On denying Hockey Sticks USHCN data and all that part 2 Watts Up With That
Did you actually think you'd get away with that?
Crick said:here have been NO complaints about those adjustments from the scientists who actually use them - only from denier hacks and pundits who don't use those data and lack any qualification to make comment on the process.
If you think Anthony Watts qualifies, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, and it's made of solid gold.
Get away with what? That i read something, made my own comments about it and used the quote from the original article and linked to it?
One thing i can say for Mr Watts is his site always gives data for me to evaluate and draw my own conclusions from.
What I find funny are the people here who think they should decide who is and is not qualified to draw conclusions and talk about them. Showing their own bias and ignorance. If you had your way all of those with whom you disagree would be bound and gagged.
Back to the Original Post, Don't you find it odd that a historical document which requires the temperature records to confirm their findings suddenly hands in a report without the data, making the report useless while still touting doom and gloom? Truth is, had they included the data their report would have shown them frauds and liars.
Another one bites the dust....