You did?Hello Ding Dong, I didn't write the report, but yes I did read it.
Then give us a few examples of what the "no evidence" wording was in reference to. I bet you won't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You did?Hello Ding Dong, I didn't write the report, but yes I did read it.
I'll bet you cannot prove one single element of the official story. Yes, you'll show a bunch of pictures of this, that and the other thing, but you sure as hell WON'T provide the pictures showing the pierced walls of the AMEX building. Your tactics are old as hell and worthless against independent thinkers. You are essentially but a propagandist trying to keep the old story going.You did?
Then give us a few examples of what the "no evidence" wording was in reference to. I bet you won't.
Sorry Toddster, this is 20 year old news. Wallace Miller was the guy's name. 20 years ago when it was news it was in the mostly European TV, his interview upon coming out of the field. If you're really curious after all these years, find it yourself. He owned a funeral home in Shanksville and was the county coroner on an as needed basis.
Like this reference to "no evidence" regarding hijackers manipulating passenger levels or purchased additional seats to facilitate their operation?Hello Ding Dong, I didn't write the report, but yes I did read it.
On the morning of 9/11, there were only 37 passengers on United 93—33 in addition to the 4 hijackers.
This was below the norm for Tuesday mornings
during the summer of 2001. But there is no evidence that the hijackers manipulated
passenger levels or purchased additional seats to facilitate their operation.
Because several passengers on United 93 described three hijackers on the
plane, not four, some have wondered whether one of the hijackers had been
able to use the cockpit jump seat from the outset of the flight. FAA rules allow
use of this seat by documented and approved individuals, usually air carrier or
FAA personnel.We have found no evidence indicating that one of the hijackers,
or anyone else, sat there on this flight.
Like your proving your claims of the "official story" being a lie with...I'll bet you cannot prove one single element of the official story.
Go ahead and show the pictures of the pierced AMEX building and then explain how they prove massive columns/steel assemblies travelling HORIZONTALLY at high speeds. Could they have fallen in a parabolic trajectory from a great height and still pierce the building? No explosives needed?Yes, you'll show a bunch of pictures of this, that and the other thing, but you sure as hell WON'T provide the pictures showing the pierced walls of the AMEX building.
Independent thinkers like The Other Mike who I just proved posts lies? Do you believe there were 47 massive steel box columns from top to bottom in the twin towers? Surely you've read about their construction right?Your tactics are old as hell and worthless against independent thinkers.
This Wallace Miller?Wallace Miller was the guy's name.
I'll bet you cannot prove one single element of the official story. Yes, you'll show a bunch of pictures of this, that and the other thing, but you sure as hell WON'T provide the pictures showing the pierced walls of the AMEX building. Your tactics are old as hell and worthless against independent thinkers. You are essentially but a propagandist trying to keep the old story going.
Before the Scamdemic you might have had a chance. Too late now, the whole country understands the government lies all the time. 911 was the biggest lie of the century until Fauci's scam.
The fact that you readily are prepared to make the box column argument is suspicious in itself.Just curious.
Is there a reason you won't address your blatant lies/misinformation when pointed out? Using this as a specific example. Your claim that there were 47 massive box columns from from bottom to top is completely wrong. You have been told this numerous times. The scans of the blueprints show this to be wrong. The video is wrong.
So my question to you is why do you continue to post this garbage if you now it's wrong? You working for someone we should know about that wants you to spread this misinformation?
One has to wonder.
You mean because you got the information completely wrong?The fact that you readily are prepared to make the box column argument is suspicious in itself.
Run Peter, run!!!!I'll bet you cannot prove one single element of the official story. Yes, you'll show a bunch of pictures of this, that and the other thing, but you sure as hell WON'T provide the pictures showing the pierced walls of the AMEX building. Your tactics are old as hell and worthless against independent thinkers. You are essentially but a propagandist trying to keep the old story going.
Before the Scamdemic you might have had a chance. Too late now, the whole country understands the government lies all the time. 911 was the biggest lie of the century until Fauci's scam.
No you didn't.but yes I did read it.
How're your lies and misinformation coming along Mikey? 47 massive box columns from bottom to top?
For the sake of my argument --they could have stacked telephone poles and the towers would have held upHow're your lies and misinformation coming along Mikey? 47 massive box columns
Your argument is a proven failureFor the sake of my argument --they could have stacked telephone poles and the towers would have held up
Now I know you’re here just to troll. That’s got to be one of the dumbest statements I’ve heard yet.For the sake of my argument --they could have stacked telephone poles and the towers would have held up
Keep posting Mikey. Your level of stupidity increases with each post.You can stack a brick on four toothpicks