the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #1,281
Yeah ..... I'm a pussy........ proof of cowardice
I bet I would have been too scared to jump out of the Tower...... I would have been turned into a baked potato like everybody else.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah ..... I'm a pussy........ proof of cowardice
You mean those victims that you dishonor and shit on for your kicksYeah ..... I'm a pussy.
I bet I would have been too scared to jump out of the Tower...... I would have been turned into a baked potato like everybody else.View attachment 758580
All three towers collapsed by controlled demolition on 9/11 .
Let's see how the truth deniers and trolls respond to my new approach, without the usual diversion and disruption tactics. Record I'm posting this in conspiracy theories because I know the administrators are required to anyway. You're welcome moderators. Once you become aware as many of us...www.usmessageboard.com
Everyone knows each twin tower had 47 massive vertical steel box columns from the ground up
No facts contradict it.What I would like to know is if the government has nothing to hide, why is it hiding so much? If the official story is true and supported by facts, why do so many facts contradict it?
Common sense tells you that truth does not mind being questioned and a lie does not like being challenged.
The only logical conclusion is that once again the government is lying.
Have an example of a fact that contradicts it?If the official story is true and supported by facts, why do so many facts contradict it?
Can you explain why The Other Mike is lying about the towers being comprised of 47 massive box columns from bottom to top?Common sense tells you that truth does not mind being questioned and a lie does not like being challenged.
Have an example of a fact that contradicts it?
More than I can count. One fact of physics is that things "fall down" towards the earth's center, gravity. Yet at WTC several large pieces of the towers were propelled horizontally with sufficient force to pierce the old AMEX building.
Another fact is that the county coroner in PA said they found no evidence of a crashed airliner. Indeed, all the photos show no airliner to be there. Also impossible cell phone calls, clearly staged phone calls with players reading from a script.
Sorry Toddster, this is 20 year old news. Wallace Miller was the guy's name. 20 years ago when it was news it was in the mostly European TV, his interview upon coming out of the field. If you're really curious after all these years, find it yourself. He owned a funeral home in Shanksville and was the county coroner on an as needed basis.Another fact is that the county coroner in PA said they found no evidence of a crashed airliner.
Link?
Care to provide proof that "several large pieces" of the towers were "propelled horizontally"? I'm not talking about showing me pictures of the steel assemblies or beams sticking out of the old AMEX building. I'm talking videos or photos showing these large assemblies actually being propelled horizontally into the AMEX building.More than I can count. One fact of physics is that things "fall down" towards the earth's center, gravity. Yet at WTC several large pieces of the towers were propelled horizontally with sufficient force to pierce the old AMEX building.
Just claims eh PeterPilot? No proof or evidence? Are we just supposed to believe you?Another fact is that the county coroner in PA said they found no evidence of a crashed airliner. Indeed, all the photos show no airliner to be there. Also impossible cell phone calls, clearly staged phone calls with players reading from a script.
Care to provide proof that "several large pieces" of the towers were "propelled horizontally"? I'm not talking about showing me pictures of the steel assemblies or beams sticking out of the old AMEX building. I'm talking videos or photos showing these large assemblies actually being propelled horizontally into the AMEX building.
I can easily explain how the beams/assemblies got lodged in the AMEX building with simple parabolic trajectories of a beam/assembly falling from a great height.
If you're really curious after all these years, find it yourself.
Ah yes, the "we found no evidence" claim. Pray tell, no evidence of what PeterPilot? Did you even look through the document to find out what the context was?The Commission Report stated many times that "we found no evidence" or words to that effect 60+ times.
Hello Ding Dong, I didn't write the report, but yes I did read it.Ah yes, the "we found no evidence" claim. Pray tell, no evidence of what PeterPilot? Did you even look through the document to find out what the context was?
So predictable.I'll pass. No element of the story is true.