Why Would Russia Contrtibute $$$ to Clinton Foundation?

[Geaux4it]

So you are not denying it didn't happen, but want proof. What would constitute proof for you? Do we need a special investigator?

-Geaux

This is your thread. I would expect YOU to make YOUR case. You don't seem willing to do so.

Just make your case. What do you have?

Its not my case. The case has already been made and I'm sure you've seen it but just don't want to believe it

-Geaux

In other words you don't have anything.

So why did you start a thread about it then?

Waste of fucking time, this thread should be closed for bullshit. I'm going to report it.

Report away--Try not being so lazy.

-Geaux

linton’s role in the Uranium One sale, and the link to the Clinton Foundation, first became an issue in 2015, when news organizations received advance copies of the book “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at a conservative think tank.

On April 23, 2015, the New York Times wrote about the uranium issue, saying the paper had “built upon” Schweizer’s information.

The Times detailed how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One.

The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren’t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after the Times story, the foundation acknowledged that it “made mistakes,” saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company.

The Times also wrote that Bill Clinton spoke at a conference in Moscow on June 29, 2010 — which was after the Rosatom-Uranium One merger was announced in June 2010, but before it was approved by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States in October 2010. The Russian-based Renaissance Capital Group organized the conference and paid Clinton $500,000.

Renaissance Capital has “ties to the Kremlin” and its analysts “talked up Uranium One’s stock, assigning it a ‘buy’ rating and saying in a July 2010 research report that it was ‘the best play’ in the uranium markets,” the Times wrote.

But there is no evidence that the donations or the speaking fee had any influence on the approvals granted by the NRC or the Committee on Foreign Investments.

The Facts on Uranium One - FactCheck.org

It's not me that's being lazy, it's YOUR FUCKING ARGUMENT, don't you get it?

^^^^^^ Tiggered ^^^^^^
Again

Aren't you the guy who always complains when someone does just what you did

Insult someone?

Don't like the news, don't blame me lol

-Geaux

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Same reason why they helped the Trump campaign and hacked our election,

I guess you haven't been watching the news.

You're just looking foolish.

 

[frigidweirdo]

This is your thread. I would expect YOU to make YOUR case. You don't seem willing to do so.

Just make your case. What do you have?

Its not my case. The case has already been made and I'm sure you've seen it but just don't want to believe it

-Geaux

In other words you don't have anything.

So why did you start a thread about it then?

Waste of fucking time, this thread should be closed for bullshit. I'm going to report it.

Report away--Try not being so lazy.

-Geaux

linton’s role in the Uranium One sale, and the link to the Clinton Foundation, first became an issue in 2015, when news organizations received advance copies of the book “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at a conservative think tank.

On April 23, 2015, the New York Times wrote about the uranium issue, saying the paper had “built upon” Schweizer’s information.

The Times detailed how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One.

The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren’t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after the Times story, the foundation acknowledged that it “made mistakes,” saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company.

The Times also wrote that Bill Clinton spoke at a conference in Moscow on June 29, 2010 — which was after the Rosatom-Uranium One merger was announced in June 2010, but before it was approved by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States in October 2010. The Russian-based Renaissance Capital Group organized the conference and paid Clinton $500,000.

Renaissance Capital has “ties to the Kremlin” and its analysts “talked up Uranium One’s stock, assigning it a ‘buy’ rating and saying in a July 2010 research report that it was ‘the best play’ in the uranium markets,” the Times wrote.

But there is no evidence that the donations or the speaking fee had any influence on the approvals granted by the NRC or the Committee on Foreign Investments.

The Facts on Uranium One - FactCheck.org

It's not me that's being lazy, it's YOUR FUCKING ARGUMENT, don't you get it?

^^^^^^ Tiggered ^^^^^^
Again

Aren't you the guy who always complains when someone does just what you did

Insult someone?

Don't like the news, don't blame me lol

-Geaux

What news? As far as I can make out, you're just making it up. Also, I didn't insult anyone.